Re: [bolger] Re: Anhinga
I wouldn't take it to heart. It's obviously untrue.
If you define away a hole bunch of stuff, then the one
remaining factor is "the most important". Largely
meaningless. Either a particular design is or isn't
(or close) appropriate to the service. Anyway I feel
better as the owner of a 23' trimaran with a beam of
18.5'...
the case that good length to beam ratio is more
important<BR>
than any section shape.<BR>
<
______________________________________________________
Send your holiday cheer withhttp://greetings.yahoo.ca
If you define away a hole bunch of stuff, then the one
remaining factor is "the most important". Largely
meaningless. Either a particular design is or isn't
(or close) appropriate to the service. Anyway I feel
better as the owner of a 23' trimaran with a beam of
18.5'...
>Talking about seaworthiness and rollover,'nuttyboats' puts<BR>
the case that good length to beam ratio is more
important<BR>
than any section shape.<BR>
<
______________________________________________________
Send your holiday cheer withhttp://greetings.yahoo.ca
"Great encouragement for Anhingerites?"
Talking about seaworthiness and rollover, 'nuttyboats' puts
the case that good length to beam ratio is more important
than any section shape.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Smallboats/message/2371
Mark
Talking about seaworthiness and rollover, 'nuttyboats' puts
the case that good length to beam ratio is more important
than any section shape.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Smallboats/message/2371
Mark