[bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation

BO>I think they should change the rules again, and require boats of square
BO>cross section built from plywood.

No! If it's restricted to Square Boats, the LS would be blocked from the
lineup!!!!
Hey, we have 3 votes for WDJ!
alex

"jack e. bearden" <bearde-@...> wrote:
> In therory WDJ gets my vote too. The challenge is to built the thing
and
> put the therory to the test.
Hot dang, Richard, great to see your endorcement. In therory WDJ gets my
vote too. The challenge is to built the thing and put the therory to the test.

jeb, kicking at the frozen ground where his new shop will be on the shores
of Fundy

At 04:21 AM 2/10/2000 -0800, you wrote:
>David: In response to your inquiry as to best boat.
>My vote is for the Jochems family schooner. I see it as kind of nautical
>travel trailer. Can stay in it on the road, or keep it in a distant slip
>for the summer and use it instead of renting a summers house or motel.
>Here on the west coast there are a number of small boat harbors with cheap
>moorage due to dead or curtailed fishing. How does 30$/month sound at the
>mouth of the Columbia River? Due to weather, rough water, cool air, and
>family considerations the jochems makes a lot of sense. It might even be
>cost effective in the long run if it keeps you out of motels and camp
>grounds. Gathering my supplies for the Jochems in Portland Oregon, Richard
>Stover.
>----------
>> From: David Ryan <david@...>
>> To:bolger@egroups.com
>> Subject: [bolger] Beer-Fueled speculation
>> Date: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 8:22 AM
>>
>> FBBB --
>>
>> Since it's still too cold to build, I offer up the following in the
>> hopes of stimulating lively discussion.
>>
>> In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
>> buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
>> construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
>> the greatest return on investment?
>>
>> Answers will be graded on a curve. Extra points for ranting and raving.
>>
>> YIBB,
>>
>>
>> David Ryan
>> Minister of Information and Culture
>> Crumbling Empire Productions
>> (212) 247-0296
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Shop for your Valentine at eGroups!
>>http://click.egroups.com/1/1149/5/_/3457/_/950027027/
>>
>> -- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
>> --http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=bolger&m=1
>>
>>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>GET A NEXTCARD VISA, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as 0.0%
>Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees. Apply NOW!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/933/5/_/3457/_/950323480/
>
>-- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
>--http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=bolger&m=1
>
>
>
Carlos,
For what it is worth,I believe it is something of a false economy to"save"weight on the bottom of the MICRO,which is precisely where the 450lbs of lead is going to hang from.However,I do think your particular construction method would be useful for the deck structure!
And speaking of hanging,that is a good chunk of weight to hang onto such a...ah...doubtful(?) bottom especially if you consider that the keel will be the first thing to come into close intimate contact with;rocks,sand bars,mud etc..sometimes on purpose,sometimes by accident and not always at a speed that will please you.
In short,do not skimp on a really tough bottom if you have any desire to ensure the longevity of your investment.
On a final note,Stan(of SNOW GOOSE fame) has a keen sense of humour regarding the effects of inhaling lead fumes,but the consequences of reckless foundry work are very real,long lasting and will forever put a serious damper on your future pleasures.Ensure lots of ventilation and go for masks if possible.
Best of luck with your MICRO building,
Sincerely,
Peter Lenihan
MICRO owner/builder


--- Carlos Byars <bolger@egroups.com> wrote:
>I'm building a Micro. The bottom is a construct of two layers of 1/8 ply
>with a 1/4-inch layer of foamcore board in between. I'm a novice, so don't
>take this as gospel, but it sure seems stiff enough and it is light. And
>the foamcore is a couple of recycled political campaign posters.
>______________________________________________________
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>GET A NEXTCARD VISA, in 30 seconds! Get rates
>as low as 0.0% Intro APR and no hidden fees.
>Apply NOW!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/975/5/_/3457/_/950289184/
>
>-- Check out your group's private Chat room
>--http://www.egroups.com/ChatPage?listName=bolger&m=1

_____________________________________________________________
the BoatBuilding.Communityhttp://boatbuilding.com/
the Internet boatbuilding, design and repair resource
The max shear stress goes right throught the middle, so don't use a foam
with no strength whatsoever just to get the sandwich.

Gregg Carlson

At 11:12 AM 2/11/2000 CST, you wrote:
>I'm building a Micro. The bottom is a construct of two layers of 1/8 ply
>with a 1/4-inch layer of foamcore board in between. I'm a novice, so don't
>take this as gospel, but it sure seems stiff enough and it is light. And
>the foamcore is a couple of recycled political campaign posters.
Sounds interesting -- how do you bond the layers together?

I would have some concerns over the resistance to punctures, should the hull
happen to hit something, or for beaching. Does your lamination have a lot
of strength in that way?

Jamie Orr

-----Original Message-----
From: Carlos Byars [mailto:c_byars@...]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2000 9:13 AM
To:bolger@egroups.com
Subject: [bolger] Re: Ply/Foam sandwich


I'm building a Micro. The bottom is a construct of two layers of 1/8 ply
with a 1/4-inch layer of foamcore board in between. I'm a novice, so don't
take this as gospel, but it sure seems stiff enough and it is light. And
the foamcore is a couple of recycled political campaign posters.
______________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------
GET A NEXTCARD VISA, in 30 seconds! Get rates
as low as 0.0% Intro APR and no hidden fees.
Apply NOW!
http://click.egroups.com/1/975/5/_/3457/_/950289184/

-- Check out your group's private Chat room
--http://www.egroups.com/ChatPage?listName=bolger&m=1
"carlos byars" <c_byar-@...> wrote:
original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/?start=2539
> I'm building a Micro. The bottom is a construct of two layers of 1/8
ply
> with a 1/4-inch layer of foamcore board in between. I'm a novice, so
don't
> take this as gospel, but it sure seems stiff enough and it is light.
And
> the foamcore is a couple of recycled political campaign posters.
> ______________________________________________________

Did you soak off the cardboard first? I think the cardboard is very
vulnerable to water, or at least it was on the board that I messed
around with a while back.

Also, if I were you I'd make a test panel and make sure the strength is
comparable to the designed plywood size. Or did you do that already?
I'm thinking you might get failure of the core. Certainly the stiffness
will be almost as good as 1/2 solid.

Also curious how you clamped the sandwich? Sounds like a great way to
keep things light.
I'm building a Micro. The bottom is a construct of two layers of 1/8 ply
with a 1/4-inch layer of foamcore board in between. I'm a novice, so don't
take this as gospel, but it sure seems stiff enough and it is light. And
the foamcore is a couple of recycled political campaign posters.
______________________________________________________
Very, very lightest and strongest - Tom Wylie (WylieCat) chose it over
exotics (aramids, carbon, glass) for a huge new sled he built a year or so
ago. I can't remember the name of the boat, but it was very competitive.

Construction was dual cold-molded skins over foam - probably some kind of
urethane like divincell, etc.

Gregg Carlson


>> List;
>> Does anyone out there have experience with using thin walls of plywood that
>> are folded in parallel and stiffened with some kind of expanding
>> polyurethane foam in between the cavities of the plywood walls. Is this
>> viable as a way to give strength at low weight cost?
>> --
>> Meyer
Hi Meyer, Just a couple of things to remember; The stuff wants to
expand, and it will! Either by swelling or pushing apart what ever your
putting it into, or out vent holes.
If you have too few or too small vent holes, the foam will harden in
them and then push apart or swell what ever your putting it into. Do a
few test shots first to see the approximately the amount of mix you
need, remembering that it keeps swelling for almost twenty four hours. I
have used it to firm up the decks in fiberglass boats that the owner
didn't want to spend the money to do it right. The first time I did it,
it lifted the deck about an inch higher than I had wanted it to, and
that was with several hundred bricks on it. I have done it since, and I
used one inch vent holes about every foot and had no problem. (Just a
lot of foam mushrooms popping out of the holes) After the boat sets for
a few days, I could jump up and down on it with no give. (I'm over 250,
I'm sad to say) Lastly, if wont stand up to sunlight, but that should be
no problem for your application. As far as cost, I have been retired too
long to be of help there, although the best place to get a small
quantity is from a refrigeration outfit that does walk in freezers. Let
me know how you make out. I hope this helps. Stan, Snow Goose

Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 15:25:12 +0800
From: "Rafael, Meyer" <Meyer.Rafael@...>

> List;
> Does anyone out there have experience with using thin walls of plywood that
> are folded in parallel and stiffened with some kind of expanding
> polyurethane foam in between the cavities of the plywood walls. Is this
> viable as a way to give strength at low weight cost?
> --
> Meyer
List;
Does anyone out there have experience with using thin walls of plywood that
are folded in parallel and stiffened with some kind of expanding
polyurethane foam in between the cavities of the plywood walls. Is this
viable as a way to give strength at low weight cost?
--
Meyer
The boat is "Burgundy". It is design #10 in "Thirty Odd Boats" (1982,
International Marine Publishing. It is a double-ended, fin-keeled,
flat-bottomed, hard-chined, but non-plywood construction boat - 28' X 6'3" X
3' 8" - quite handsome, at least in the drawings. It is rigged as a cat-yawl
with leg-o'-mutton sails with sprit booms. Bolger calls it a "speculative
design" in TOB, but I can't help but believe that more than a few people have
been seduced into building one. On paper at least it looks most elegant. My
only reservation is a certain amount of sceptism about reefing the rig.

Off subject, Dr. Bolger's description concludes with the remark that
"Burgundy" is to "Rozinante" as a Playboy centerfold is to a Ruebens
original. Il Professatore may be more of an art critic than I realized. I
recently read an article in a rather intellectually pretentious journal which
mentioned in passing that some art historian had established that the
renaissance patrons who commissioned those great canvas of vast naked pink
ladies were definitely interested in their prurient appeal, not the feeble
allegories they are conventionally attributed!
Date sent: Tue, 08 Feb 2000 16:32:28 -0600
From: Stan Muller <smuller@...>
To:bolger@egroups.com
Send reply to:bolger@egroups.com
Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation

Bloody hell Stan! On the strength of your letter, I rushed out to see
if my Micro hasn't been stolen.

Don


> David, in a word, Micro.
> Stan, Snow Goose
> PS: At least I'm consistent!!
> For the investment of a 16 foot boat, you have the return of the
> inside space of a (home built) 22 footer, and the stability of a 26
> footer. As far as the social status; you defiantly go to the top of the;
> "what the heck is that club". To the uninitiated, (in other words,
> anybody that doesn't know Phil) any sailing accomplishment appears
> greater then it really is, and brings higher praise than deserved.
> For me, the greatest thing I favor about the micro, is the fact that
> when building it, there is the freedom to express your self with a mass
> of modifications without changing Bolger's overall design and benefit
> package that the hull shape provides. Look at the Micros on the web,
> you'll see a different hatch here, a change in the cockpit there, even a
> fantastic keyed keel, but where the sail meets the air and where the
> boat meets the water, everything is still as drawn. (as well it should
> be) ((except for the Navigator, a Micro on steroids)) the ultimate
> modification!
> As has been said, "The Micro is all the boat that 95% of boaters
> need". I would give it a higher number, but then, I'm a fan.
> How many boats can be trailered to the lake, be setup in a half hour
> or less, be big enough and stabile enough for the family outing, be
> single handed along the coastal water way, have a comfortable enough
> cockpit for you and a buddy to weekend fish off of, spend an extended
> river cruise on, runs well on a 4 to 5 HP outboard, be self bailing,
> self righting, self rescuing, easily enough made that even I can do it,
> meet new people with, (as in, "hey pal, do you need all those wheel
> weights") or (Hi neighbors, come over for a beer this afternoon and I'll
> show you how we turn the hull over) And.... drum roll... STILL BE BUILT
> IN A 20 FOOT SINGLE CAR GARAGE!!!! How is that for, Bang for the buck?
> There is much, much more I could add, but I wanted to quit at just a
> rant and leave the raving to the more articulate among us.
> Stan of the MICRO, Snow Goose.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Valentine's Day Shopping Made Simple. Click Here!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/1155/5/_/3457/_/950049281/
>
> -- Talk to your group with your own voice!
> --http://www.egroups.com/VoiceChatPage?listName=bolger&m=1
>
>
>
Funny, I'd have thought that PCB's 'ticket to heaven' (Gloucester Gull/Light
Dory) would have been up there among the leaders. So far, if my eyes do not
deceive me, no mention . . . Ain't we got ANY taste? ( . . or should that
be 'NO taste'?)

Bill
> Hard to believe there's no America in the America's Cup.

Remember, though, that the cup was named after the yacht 'America', not the
country of the same name. There's a subtle difference.

Bill Samson
"
> > I just knew you'd eventually work in a reference to the proud
> Italians. I'm
> > still shocked that Cayard needed one out of two, lost both starts,
and
> > really didn't do anything spectacular in either race.
>

I disagree with the assertion that Cayard lost both starts. In the last
race, he wanted the right and he got it. Half way up the leg, the wind
went slightly right, and the boats were dead even. So, not a lost
start, as I see it.

However, then the wind went left, giving Prada a small lead. Neither
Prada nor the wind gave AmericaOne any chance to get back in the race.
I think that Prada has a small speed advantage in the 15-20kt zone,
perhaps 1 boat length per leg. I told my wife before the race that if
the wind was >20 the Americans would win, and if <20 the Italians would
win. The wind was <20 for the first leg.

Peter
David: In response to your inquiry as to best boat.
My vote is for the Jochems family schooner. I see it as kind of nautical
travel trailer. Can stay in it on the road, or keep it in a distant slip
for the summer and use it instead of renting a summers house or motel.
Here on the west coast there are a number of small boat harbors with cheap
moorage due to dead or curtailed fishing. How does 30$/month sound at the
mouth of the Columbia River? Due to weather, rough water, cool air, and
family considerations the jochems makes a lot of sense. It might even be
cost effective in the long run if it keeps you out of motels and camp
grounds. Gathering my supplies for the Jochems in Portland Oregon, Richard
Stover.
----------
> From: David Ryan <david@...>
> To:bolger@egroups.com
> Subject: [bolger] Beer-Fueled speculation
> Date: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 8:22 AM
>
> FBBB --
>
> Since it's still too cold to build, I offer up the following in the
> hopes of stimulating lively discussion.
>
> In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
> the greatest return on investment?
>
> Answers will be graded on a curve. Extra points for ranting and raving.
>
> YIBB,
>
>
> David Ryan
> Minister of Information and Culture
> Crumbling Empire Productions
> (212) 247-0296
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Shop for your Valentine at eGroups!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/1149/5/_/3457/_/950027027/
>
> -- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
> --http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=bolger&m=1
>
>
Carter,
yes, I should have added "for home builders" and, of course "that I
know of". I thought though that both sentences were to unnecessary,
since we were talking about home-made boats and since my knowledge of
boat designs is limited.
Best,

Pippo

"carter kennedy" <jkc-@...> wrote:

> What is this "only" stuff? The only such home-built, perhaps. There is
> a mass-produced 15-foot boat made in California called the West Wight
> Potter. People have sailed them across oceans. Of course, they cost
> more than it takes to build a Micro, and may not be available around
> the world. But the Micro is not the only real pocket cruiser less than
> 5 meters.
ROBERT!

> I just knew you'd eventually work in a reference to the proud
Italians. I'm
> still shocked that Cayard needed one out of two, lost both starts, and
> really didn't do anything spectacular in either race.

De Angelis needed two over four... And in any case let me say that the
Italians proved to be faster. I'm pretty sure also that we're not going
to see so many red and yellow flags flapping around...

> Hard to believe there's no America in the America's Cup.

Yeah - as hard as believing that the French won the Soccer World Cup!

> I ordered my Team NZ Cap and T Shirt two weeks ago and they should
arrive
> just before the AC starts. I'm afraid Mr. Coutts and Butterworth are
truly
> going to carve up a super Italian Effort.

We'll see, we'll see...

> BTW Pippo, do you guys grow these gazillionaires all over, I mean
first we
> have Guardini with the 5 boat Il Moro challenge in '92 and now this
new
> gentleman. What's with the all the rich Italians and the america's
cup?

I think it's exactly the same with all the rich Americans and the
America's Cup... Or do you mean we should have organized a fund rising
effort to help the poor US teams (5 of them) to oppose to the
overwhelming financial power of the Italians? Remember that Nippon
Challenge's budget was larger than Prada Challenge's, and many others
were very close...

Win the best,

Pippo
he,s been way ahead of his time for a while now thats the really neat
part:):):) Hey Phil we need a canidate for the Eclectic Party!!!!!!
g,nite all D.W.Johnson
----- Original Message -----
From: Lincoln Ross <lincolnr@...>

>tjfatche-@...wrote:
> original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/?start=2460
> > BO>I think they should change the rules again, and require boats of
> square
> > BO>cross section built from plywood.
> >
> > No! If it's restricted to Square Boats, the LS would be blocked from
> the
> > lineup!!!!
> >
> >
> While racing, you can attach a temporary square midship section. But
> everyone knows you need a purpose built boat for the America's Cup. Or
> maybe I should insert grandfather clause allowing flare if sharp angle
> at chine. But I like square better for this purpose.


The current crop of AC boats already have nearly plumb sides. All we need to
require is a hard chine. Looking at the stern sections of TNZ's boats leads
one to beleive we are almost there too.

"Crazy" ol' Phil isn't so crazy after all. He's just ahead of his time!

JB
tjfatche-@...wrote:
original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/?start=2460
> BO>I think they should change the rules again, and require boats of
square
> BO>cross section built from plywood.
>
> No! If it's restricted to Square Boats, the LS would be blocked from
the
> lineup!!!!
>
>
While racing, you can attach a temporary square midship section. But
everyone knows you need a purpose built boat for the America's Cup. Or
maybe I should insert grandfather clause allowing flare if sharp angle
at chine. But I like square better for this purpose.

On a totally different subject, are you an early bird? How many hours
ahead (behind) of Greenwich? 5 hours behind Greenwich here, 19:23.

(This response the first fully qualified response to this thread as I
am using one beer to mitigate effect of dentist. Wondering if anyone
knows how to make durable crown (for tooth) with plywood and epoxy but
no drilling or pouring lead)
>david ryan <davi-@...> wrote:
>original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/?start=2443
> >snip
> >
> > My Brooklyn in-laws always give me the hairy eye ball when I talk
> > about boats. For dem, boats is something for snooty rich people, the
> > rest of us are supposed to sit on the stoop.
>My s.o. told someone at work that we had a boat, and she accused us of
>buying it to show we were successful. Little did she know it was small
>enough to pick up with one hand. (Monfort Cartopper 9)

Owning a boat, not matter how large or teak covered, doesn't show
you're successful.

Getting to use your boat A LOT does!

YIBB,

David Ryan
Minister of Information and Culture
Crumbling Empire Productions
(212) 247-0296
> When I read the first post on this subject the first boat
>that came to mind was the "Sir Joseph Banks" (chapter 75
>BWAOM). At nearly 100 feet this big boy has got to give the
>most bang for the buck. Bolger quoted $250k to knock one
>together back in '91. I doubt it would cost much more these
>days. If some used gear (engines, hydraulics, etc) were used
>I'm sure the cost would be reduced to well under 200k. Now, the
>SJB would certainly pay her own way over the years. Up my way
>here in coastal British Columbia, a boat like this would do a
>profitable trade delivering a wide range goods to all the
>islands. Or, eco-tours. With a fancy fit-out SJB would even
>make an okay small cruise ship for 12 guests and a half dozen
>crew to travel in luxury. Or, the boat could be sailed anywhere
>with a "crew" that pays you for the experiance. If you want
>good value for your dollar or you to make money building boats,
>build a boat like the Sir Joseph Banks.

I was wondering how long it would take for someone to say SJB. Lots
of nice assertions, any real world facts to go with them?

YIBB,

David Ryan
Minister of Information and Culture
Crumbling Empire Productions
(212) 247-0296
Hi,

I should have pointed out that the Payson Pirogue is the boat referred to as
a 13' Canoe in Dynamite's catalogue.

Bill
I think it all depends where one likes to sail. A cartopable punt or
skiff are great for lakes while a trailable sailboat works for costal
cruising. That is unless you are on the other side of the Globe where
25 knot wind is calm weather and all-weather boat is a trailable
submarine…

I do coastal sailing and large lakes, and, after a storm or two,
seaworthiness is more important to me that the boat's weight. I've
been a trailer-sailor for a while, and for me to tow a 6,000 - 8,000
lbs boat is not much different than towing a 140 lbs Sunfish except for
mpg. Actually, it is easier to back up an 8,000 lbs boat than Sunfish.


At any rate, in trailable sailboats, I would vote for Micro /Long Micro
except for their keels - I dread of attaching a 400+ lbs peace of lead
to a keel. Be as it may, Micro is a brilliant design.

I suspect William D. Jochems Schooner or Whalewatcher may be just the
ticket for me if I will ever venture to tackle a project of this size.

alex

> In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
> the greatest return on investment?
>
> Answers will be graded on a curve. Extra points for ranting and
raving.
>
> YIBB,
>
>
> David Ryan
> Minister of Information and Culture
> Crumbling Empire Productions
> (212) 247-0296
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lincoln Ross" <lincolnr@...>
I think America's cup is about as far as you
> can get from Bolger boating.

Not that far from Bolger. Bolger is one of the most elegant designers
in history. While he puts his emphisis on bang for the buck and sea
kindly designs. His methods and philosiphy would work on racers as
well with the modification of the cost factors to favor speed, speed,
and light weight.

Both methods of design require taking the cost factors to the extreem.
It's the same idea just at different ends of the spectra. I would bet that
Phil could design a better Americas cup racer than the high end designer
could design a boat to compete with Bolger's.

Gordon W5RED
G. C. Cougergcouger@...Stillwater, OK
"You miss 100 percent of the shots you never take." - Wayne Gretzky
I vote for Tortoise (like a small Brick), 6' 7". I put it on my shoulder
and carry it all around. (No, I'm a little guy). Instead of a trailer, I am
thinking about a narrow platform built out from the rear bumper of the car
that is the width of the side of the boat, the full length of the back of the
car. The boat culd be rested on it's side across the width of the car. Only
problem so far is that the brake lights would be behind the boat. Regards,
Warren
Wow, now I know why my ears were burning!

If I were to do it all over again, I would probably go with--dare I say
it--something other than a Brick. While mine has been great fun, the
reality of its use has been as a daysailer with only two aboard, and I
would have liked to be able to row in those lakes (such as Walden Pond)
where sailing is not permitted, or just for the heck of it.

I am very glad I built an original-style Instant Boat, as I truly
detest working with fiberglass, so I would probably recommend an
Elegant Punt for car-topping or truck-bedding. In fact, one of these
days I might just dig out my copy of INSTANT BOATS and....

It's an addiction!

My best to all,

Matthew

"lincoln ross" <lincoln-@...> wrote:
original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/?start=2392
> No beer here, so maybe my opinion doesn't count, but I think Mr. Long
> has gotten an awful lot of entertainment from his project (a brick).
> Not sure, but I think I heart a faint "what the heck is that?" shouted
> from the direction of Jamaica Plain one time in 1998. Is social status
> to be maximized or minimized? I've gotten a lot of entertainment just
> thinking about a brick, though I think I'd actually go more in the
June
> Bug direction as I like to row. Current project is a Nymph, but I was
> foolish enough to take it over from someone else, so it's more work
> than it should be. It does sit nice and quiet on top of car at highway
> speeds, which I'll bet a Brick won't.
>
> Anyone know a Bolger design similar to a Car Topper except rows well
> with two people, possibly a tad longer? In more ambitions moments
> sometimes think of doing a stripped out and lightened Sweet Pea with
> daggerboard, transom and outboard rudder. All pipe dream, of course.
>
> david ryan <davi-@...> wrote:
> snip
> > In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> > buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> > construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat
yields
> > the greatest return on investment?
> >snip
> > YIBB,
> > snip
> > David Ryan
> > Minister of Information and Culture
> > Crumbling Empire Productions
> > (212) 247-0296
>
david ryan <davi-@...> wrote:
original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/?start=2443
>snip
>
> My Brooklyn in-laws always give me the hairy eye ball when I talk
> about boats. For dem, boats is something for snooty rich people, the
> rest of us are supposed to sit on the stoop.
My s.o. told someone at work that we had a boat, and she accused us of
buying it to show we were successful. Little did she know it was small
enough to pick up with one hand. (Monfort Cartopper 9)
When I read the first post on this subject the first boat
that came to mind was the "Sir Joseph Banks" (chapter 75
BWAOM). At nearly 100 feet this big boy has got to give the
most bang for the buck. Bolger quoted $250k to knock one
together back in '91. I doubt it would cost much more these
days. If some used gear (engines, hydraulics, etc) were used
I'm sure the cost would be reduced to well under 200k. Now, the
SJB would certainly pay her own way over the years. Up my way
here in coastal British Columbia, a boat like this would do a
profitable trade delivering a wide range goods to all the
islands. Or, eco-tours. With a fancy fit-out SJB would even
make an okay small cruise ship for 12 guests and a half dozen
crew to travel in luxury. Or, the boat could be sailed anywhere
with a "crew" that pays you for the experiance. If you want
good value for your dollar or you to make money building boats,
build a boat like the Sir Joseph Banks.

Ron
49`32'N - 123`44'W
Hello Guys

Now I wouldn't like to make any predictions about the outcome of the cup but do have a couple of observations.

Any sport at this level is about two things - PASSION and money, guess what will overcome money every time??

The second word in the 95 NZ campaign prospectus was - Passion. When I read that I was pretty sure that our guys finally had the right leader in Peter Blake.

Don't give Pippo's boys a hard time because although they do have money, boy have they also got PASSION.

For this reason I think they'll be much more dangerous opponents for Team NZ than Cayard was ever likely to be.

Regards - Foster
Southland, NEW ZEALAND

----------
From: Robert N. Lundy[SMTP:robert@...]
Sent: Wednesday, 9 February 2000 2:01 pm
To:bolger@egroups.com
Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation

PIPPO!

I just knew you'd eventually work in a reference to the proud Italians. I'm
still shocked that Cayard needed one out of two, lost both starts, and
really didn't do anything spectacular in either race.

Hard to believe there's no America in the America's Cup. The ESPN guys are
probably crying in their cups and the drop in viewership for the (FINALLY)
prime time races. Its going to be hard to stop hitting the FF button
everytime one of the same stupid Lincoln Financial commercials come on.

I ordered my Team NZ Cap and T Shirt two weeks ago and they should arrive
just before the AC starts. I'm afraid Mr. Coutts and Butterworth are truly
going to carve up a super Italian Effort.

BTW Pippo, do you guys grow these gazillionaires all over, I mean first we
have Guardini with the 5 boat Il Moro challenge in '92 and now this new
gentleman. What's with the all the rich Italians and the america's cup?

Robert & Amy Lundy
St. Petersburg, fla.
robert@...
amy@...


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Giuseppe 'Pippo' Bianco [mailto:pippobianco@...]
> Sent: February 08, 2000 6:21 PM
> To:bolger@egroups.com
> Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation
>
>
> David, my knowledge of PCB's designs is limited to the ones in published
> in BWAOM and in Dynamite Payson's books, as well as to those whose plans
> are being sold by CSB and Dynamite Payson (plus several others which
> appeared in old issue of the CSD Newsletters).
> Unespectedly enough, I vote for Micro as first and for the sheet-ply
> Chebacco as close second.
> Stan has already said much on Micro: it's the only real pocket cruiser
> less than 5 meters LOA, period. Simple to build, safe, seaworthy
> (exceptionally seaworthy for its size), performant, roomy, comfortable.
> I still don't know for sure about how it goes on and off a trailer: I
> suspect it's a pig to launch and retrieve, but then Gregg Carlson (who
> I'm sure trails, launches and retrieves is 44' ketch too) says that you
> can launch it in ankle deep water...
> Regarding the Chebacco, it's "social status" is higher than the Micro's:
> it's beautiful, fast, shallow draft, luxurious cockpit, the ideal family
> daysailer. I was very close to go for the Chebacco (and I might do that
> in the future) but the Micro is too appealing to me. A quasi-perfect
> boat, as there's no perfect boat, except Luna Rossa ;-)
> Best, Pippo
>
> David Ryan ha scritto:
> >
> > FBBB --
> >
> > Since it's still too cold to build, I offer up the following in the
> > hopes of stimulating lively discussion.
> >
> > In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> > buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> > construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
> > the greatest return on investment?
> >
> > Answers will be graded on a curve. Extra points for ranting and raving.
> >
> > YIBB,
> >
> > David Ryan
> > Minister of Information and Culture
> > Crumbling Empire Productions
> > (212) 247-0296
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Shop for your Valentine at eGroups!
> >http://click.egroups.com/1/1149/5/_/3457/_/950027027/
> >
> > -- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
> > --http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=bolger&m=1
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Want To Be Showered With Kisses? Visit eGroups Valentine Gift Guide
>http://click.egroups.com/1/1160/5/_/3457/_/950052100/
>
> -- Check out your group's private Chat room
> --http://www.egroups.com/ChatPage?listName=bolger&m=1
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------
What's better than getting a Great Deal?

Getting a Great Deal delivered right to your email in-box!
http://click.egroups.com/1/1233/5/_/3457/_/950058101/

-- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
--http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=bolger&m=1
>i,m kinda partial to the amesbury skiff don,t know bout the bang for buck
>factori just think it looks really kewll gonna have to build one soon
>D.W.Johnson

How much beer did you drink?

David Ryan
Minister of Information and Culture
Crumbling Empire Productions
(212) 247-0296
>
>Our American gazillionaires are now pale, pasty indoor types (with the
>possible exception of Ted Turner, who I heard about from sailboat
>racing long before I heard about him anywhere else). If Bill G becomes
>interested, it will be impossible to beat him unless his boat freezes
>up and needs rebooting. I think America's cup is about as far as you
>can get from Bolger boating.

The further away, the better.

My Brooklyn in-laws always give me the hairy eye ball when I talk
about boats. For dem, boats is something for snooty rich people, the
rest of us are supposed to sit on the stoop. I keep forgetting to put
Parker's "The Sharpie Book" in their hands (they're suckers for
anything historical.)

As someone noted before, our economy seems to be predicated on the
notion you should spend all your time working to buy something you
really can't afford to buy, and really, really, really don't have the
money to enjoy -- fantasia through consumption.

When I ride the train between NYC and Montauk, I am astonished at the
backyard after back yard filled with good intention -- collapsed
above ground pools, boats and cars rotting on cinderblocks. Half of
the boats in Montauk only leave their slips to be put up for winter
storage.

Now I'm not advocating any of that live simply so that other may
simply live crap, but heyzoos krisco! did the simple act of buying
that boat, parting with your hard earned money give you *that* much
pleasure? Maybe it did, maybe it did. After all, you've got to spend
your money on something.

In the meantime, I'm far more concerned with the hot housing markets
effect on my materials cost. At this rate, the hull for my New Haven
could cost as much as $1000 ;-)

YIBB,


David Ryan
Minister of Information and Culture
Crumbling Empire Productions
(212) 247-0296
i think the updated version you seek may be in diff boats by PCB
i,m kinda partial to the amesbury skiff don,t know bout the bang for buck
factori just think it looks really kewll gonna have to build one soon
D.W.Johnson
What a facinating thread! I would agree with Bill Samson that the Payson Pirogue
is a pretty nice boat, and I really regret selling the one I built, but if we go
back to Dave's original parameters of the: "poly-dimensional matrix of cost to
build, easy [sic] of construction, usability, social status, etc....", I would
have to include resale value and income potential into the equation. This would
lead me to the conclusion that one of PCB's more traditional designs would be
preferred, in spite of the difficulty of the original construction. Now, I like
Romp, Bright Thread, and especially Manatee, and some of the smaller designs such
as Lynx are pleasing enough to market if executed well, but what could raise
one's social status (and generate more grant money) than a full rigged ship? My
vote goes to The Rose. Does anyone know where I can get a hundred thousand board
feet of well aged white oak, cheap? <g>
david

Samson family wrote:

> >In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> >buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> >construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
> >the greatest return on investment?
> >
> Right! You asked for it! I've built half a dozen boats:
>
> 9' Percy Blandford Curlew (gunter rigged sloop)
> 15' Iain Oughtred Seahorse flatiron skiff, lug rigged
> 6.5' trad lapstrake (clinker) pram dinghy by Alan Buchanan
> 13' Payson Pirogue - open double-paddle canoe designed by PCB
> Chebacco 20 by PCB
> June Bug, by PCB
>
> >From this (admittedly limited) experience over the past couple of decades, I
> have no hesitation in announcing that the Payson Pirogue has more hours
> under her keel than any of the others, for a number of reasons:
>
> Easily cartoppable (single handed)
> You can take it anywhere, and launch it where there's 4" of water
> I take it everywhere on holiday, without hassle or anxiety
> I've crossed open water in it (favourable conditions, of course)
> It'll take two people
> Masochists can camp under it
> You can portage it over shallows (single handed)
> You can fish from it
> It's surprisingly fast (low wetted area)
> It can be built from 2 sheets of cheapo ply ($60 including glass tape and
> resin)
> It takes (at most) two weekends to build it
>
> So - It's my most beloved boat.
>
> Bill Samson
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Join eLerts to Save!
> Sign up for one or two today!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/1232/5/_/3457/_/950040548/
>
> eGroups.com Home:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/
>http://www.egroups.com- Simplifying group communications
I think they should change the rules again, and require boats of square
cross section built from plywood.

"robert n. lundy" <rober-@...> wrote:
original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/?start=2438
> PIPPO!
>
>snip
>
> Hard to believe there's no America in the America's Cup. The ESPN
guys are
> probably crying in their cups and the drop in viewership for the
(FINALLY)
> prime time races. snip
>
> BTW Pippo, do you guys grow these gazillionaires all over, I mean
first we
> have Guardini with the 5 boat Il Moro challenge in '92 and now this
new
> gentleman. What's with the all the rich Italians and the america's
cup?
>
Our American gazillionaires are now pale, pasty indoor types (with the
possible exception of Ted Turner, who I heard about from sailboat
racing long before I heard about him anywhere else). If Bill G becomes
interested, it will be impossible to beat him unless his boat freezes
up and needs rebooting. I think America's cup is about as far as you
can get from Bolger boating.
>snip
PIPPO!

I just knew you'd eventually work in a reference to the proud Italians. I'm
still shocked that Cayard needed one out of two, lost both starts, and
really didn't do anything spectacular in either race.

Hard to believe there's no America in the America's Cup. The ESPN guys are
probably crying in their cups and the drop in viewership for the (FINALLY)
prime time races. Its going to be hard to stop hitting the FF button
everytime one of the same stupid Lincoln Financial commercials come on.

I ordered my Team NZ Cap and T Shirt two weeks ago and they should arrive
just before the AC starts. I'm afraid Mr. Coutts and Butterworth are truly
going to carve up a super Italian Effort.

BTW Pippo, do you guys grow these gazillionaires all over, I mean first we
have Guardini with the 5 boat Il Moro challenge in '92 and now this new
gentleman. What's with the all the rich Italians and the america's cup?

Robert & Amy Lundy
St. Petersburg, fla.
robert@...
amy@...


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Giuseppe 'Pippo' Bianco [mailto:pippobianco@...]
> Sent: February 08, 2000 6:21 PM
> To:bolger@egroups.com
> Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation
>
>
> David, my knowledge of PCB's designs is limited to the ones in published
> in BWAOM and in Dynamite Payson's books, as well as to those whose plans
> are being sold by CSB and Dynamite Payson (plus several others which
> appeared in old issue of the CSD Newsletters).
> Unespectedly enough, I vote for Micro as first and for the sheet-ply
> Chebacco as close second.
> Stan has already said much on Micro: it's the only real pocket cruiser
> less than 5 meters LOA, period. Simple to build, safe, seaworthy
> (exceptionally seaworthy for its size), performant, roomy, comfortable.
> I still don't know for sure about how it goes on and off a trailer: I
> suspect it's a pig to launch and retrieve, but then Gregg Carlson (who
> I'm sure trails, launches and retrieves is 44' ketch too) says that you
> can launch it in ankle deep water...
> Regarding the Chebacco, it's "social status" is higher than the Micro's:
> it's beautiful, fast, shallow draft, luxurious cockpit, the ideal family
> daysailer. I was very close to go for the Chebacco (and I might do that
> in the future) but the Micro is too appealing to me. A quasi-perfect
> boat, as there's no perfect boat, except Luna Rossa ;-)
> Best, Pippo
>
> David Ryan ha scritto:
> >
> > FBBB --
> >
> > Since it's still too cold to build, I offer up the following in the
> > hopes of stimulating lively discussion.
> >
> > In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> > buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> > construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
> > the greatest return on investment?
> >
> > Answers will be graded on a curve. Extra points for ranting and raving.
> >
> > YIBB,
> >
> > David Ryan
> > Minister of Information and Culture
> > Crumbling Empire Productions
> > (212) 247-0296
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Shop for your Valentine at eGroups!
> >http://click.egroups.com/1/1149/5/_/3457/_/950027027/
> >
> > -- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
> > --http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=bolger&m=1
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Want To Be Showered With Kisses? Visit eGroups Valentine Gift Guide
>http://click.egroups.com/1/1160/5/_/3457/_/950052100/
>
> -- Check out your group's private Chat room
> --http://www.egroups.com/ChatPage?listName=bolger&m=1
>
>
The Rozinante update is Burgundy (I think) written up in 30 Odd Boats. Its
made of preformed straightedge panels of normal lumber (not Plywood), with a
nice keel and deadwood. Really is pretty, and probably as simple to build
as a non-plywood boat can be.

Robert & Amy Lundy
St. Petersburg, fla.
robert@...
amy@...


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rafael, Meyer [mailto:Meyer.Rafael@...]
> Sent: February 08, 2000 6:24 PM
> To: 'bolger@egroups.com'
> Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation
>
>
> I am writing from work so the following quotation is from memory...
> In "Boats with an Open Mind", PCB quotes the letter which requests the
> update of the "SeaBird". Not surprisingly this is the lead-in to
> the chapter
> on SeaBird 86.
> The writer (Salter?) writes to PCB, probably via SBJ, saying, "you have
> already updated Rozinante...".
> So I understand from this that there is a low-cost Rozinante suitable to
> build in currently available materials. I have never seen any other
> reference to this boat. This might solve the aged white oak problem. Can
> anyone help with a pointer to the updated Rose?
> Regards
> Meyer
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: david [mailto:galvind@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 12:23 PM
> To:bolger@egroups.com
> Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation
>
>
> What a facinating thread! I would agree with Bill Samson that the Payson
> Pirogue
> is a pretty nice boat, and I really regret selling the one I built, but if
> we go
> back to Dave's original parameters of the: "poly-dimensional
> matrix of cost
> to
> build, easy [sic] of construction, usability, social status, etc....", I
> would
> have to include resale value and income potential into the equation. This
> would
> lead me to the conclusion that one of PCB's more traditional designs would
> be
> preferred, in spite of the difficulty of the original construction. Now, I
> like
> Romp, Bright Thread, and especially Manatee, and some of the
> smaller designs
> such
> as Lynx are pleasing enough to market if executed well, but what
> could raise
> one's social status (and generate more grant money) than a full
> rigged ship?
> My
> vote goes to The Rose. Does anyone know where I can get a hundred thousand
> board
> feet of well aged white oak, cheap? <g>
> david
>
> Samson family wrote:
>
> > >In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> > >buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> > >construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
> > >the greatest return on investment?
> > >
> > Right! You asked for it! I've built half a dozen boats:
> >
> > 9' Percy Blandford Curlew (gunter rigged sloop)
> > 15' Iain Oughtred Seahorse flatiron skiff, lug rigged
> > 6.5' trad lapstrake (clinker) pram dinghy by Alan Buchanan
> > 13' Payson Pirogue - open double-paddle canoe designed by PCB
> > Chebacco 20 by PCB
> > June Bug, by PCB
> >
> > >From this (admittedly limited) experience over the past couple of
> decades, I
> > have no hesitation in announcing that the Payson Pirogue has more hours
> > under her keel than any of the others, for a number of reasons:
> >
> > Easily cartoppable (single handed)
> > You can take it anywhere, and launch it where there's 4" of water
> > I take it everywhere on holiday, without hassle or anxiety
> > I've crossed open water in it (favourable conditions, of course)
> > It'll take two people
> > Masochists can camp under it
> > You can portage it over shallows (single handed)
> > You can fish from it
> > It's surprisingly fast (low wetted area)
> > It can be built from 2 sheets of cheapo ply ($60 including
> glass tape and
> > resin)
> > It takes (at most) two weekends to build it
> >
> > So - It's my most beloved boat.
> >
> > Bill Samson
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Join eLerts to Save!
> > Sign up for one or two today!
> >http://click.egroups.com/1/1232/5/_/3457/_/950040548/
> >
> > eGroups.com Home:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/
> >http://www.egroups.com- Simplifying group communications
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What's better than getting a Great Deal?
> Getting a Great Deal delivered right to your email in-box!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/1239/5/_/3457/_/950049132/
>
> -- 20 megs of disk space in your group's Document Vault
> --http://www.egroups.com/docvault/bolger/?m=1
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Join eLerts to Save! Sign up for one or two today!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/1232/5/_/3457/_/950052477/
>
> -- 20 megs of disk space in your group's Document Vault
> --http://www.egroups.com/docvault/bolger/?m=1
>
>
The updated Rozinante is called Burgandy. It must be in 30 Odd Boats. It
has a double-ended hull somewhat like the Single Handed Schooner, but about
28 feet overall. The rig is cat-ketch. The whole boat is extremely
simplified: no halyards, no engine, etc. The motivating idea was to build
the topsides flat of dimensional lumber, then bend them into position, in
order to get the ease of building with plywood but without the restriction
to industrial plywood sizes. Also, possibly, to get a better quality of wood.

It's a keel boat with the rudder attached to a shortish fin.

I don't know if any were ever built.

Peter.

At 07:24 AM 2/9/00 +0800, you wrote:
>I am writing from work so the following quotation is from memory...
>In "Boats with an Open Mind", PCB quotes the letter which requests the
>update of the "SeaBird". Not surprisingly this is the lead-in to the chapter
>on SeaBird 86.
>The writer (Salter?) writes to PCB, probably via SBJ, saying, "you have
>already updated Rozinante...".
>So I understand from this that there is a low-cost Rozinante suitable to
>build in currently available materials. I have never seen any other
>reference to this boat. This might solve the aged white oak problem. Can
>anyone help with a pointer to the updated Rose?
>Regards
>Meyer
giuseppe 'pippo' bianco <pippobianc-@...> wrote:

> Stan has already said much on Micro: it's the only real pocket cruiser
> less than 5 meters LOA, period.

What is this "only" stuff? The only such home-built, perhaps. There is
a mass-produced 15-foot boat made in California called the West Wight
Potter. People have sailed them across oceans. Of course, they cost
more than it takes to build a Micro, and may not be available around
the world. But the Micro is not the only real pocket cruiser less than
5 meters.

Carter
I am writing from work so the following quotation is from memory...
In "Boats with an Open Mind", PCB quotes the letter which requests the
update of the "SeaBird". Not surprisingly this is the lead-in to the chapter
on SeaBird 86.
The writer (Salter?) writes to PCB, probably via SBJ, saying, "you have
already updated Rozinante...".
So I understand from this that there is a low-cost Rozinante suitable to
build in currently available materials. I have never seen any other
reference to this boat. This might solve the aged white oak problem. Can
anyone help with a pointer to the updated Rose?
Regards
Meyer


-----Original Message-----
From: david [mailto:galvind@...]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 12:23 PM
To:bolger@egroups.com
Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation


What a facinating thread! I would agree with Bill Samson that the Payson
Pirogue
is a pretty nice boat, and I really regret selling the one I built, but if
we go
back to Dave's original parameters of the: "poly-dimensional matrix of cost
to
build, easy [sic] of construction, usability, social status, etc....", I
would
have to include resale value and income potential into the equation. This
would
lead me to the conclusion that one of PCB's more traditional designs would
be
preferred, in spite of the difficulty of the original construction. Now, I
like
Romp, Bright Thread, and especially Manatee, and some of the smaller designs
such
as Lynx are pleasing enough to market if executed well, but what could raise
one's social status (and generate more grant money) than a full rigged ship?
My
vote goes to The Rose. Does anyone know where I can get a hundred thousand
board
feet of well aged white oak, cheap? <g>
david

Samson family wrote:

> >In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> >buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> >construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
> >the greatest return on investment?
> >
> Right! You asked for it! I've built half a dozen boats:
>
> 9' Percy Blandford Curlew (gunter rigged sloop)
> 15' Iain Oughtred Seahorse flatiron skiff, lug rigged
> 6.5' trad lapstrake (clinker) pram dinghy by Alan Buchanan
> 13' Payson Pirogue - open double-paddle canoe designed by PCB
> Chebacco 20 by PCB
> June Bug, by PCB
>
> >From this (admittedly limited) experience over the past couple of
decades, I
> have no hesitation in announcing that the Payson Pirogue has more hours
> under her keel than any of the others, for a number of reasons:
>
> Easily cartoppable (single handed)
> You can take it anywhere, and launch it where there's 4" of water
> I take it everywhere on holiday, without hassle or anxiety
> I've crossed open water in it (favourable conditions, of course)
> It'll take two people
> Masochists can camp under it
> You can portage it over shallows (single handed)
> You can fish from it
> It's surprisingly fast (low wetted area)
> It can be built from 2 sheets of cheapo ply ($60 including glass tape and
> resin)
> It takes (at most) two weekends to build it
>
> So - It's my most beloved boat.
>
> Bill Samson
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Join eLerts to Save!
> Sign up for one or two today!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/1232/5/_/3457/_/950040548/
>
> eGroups.com Home:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/
>http://www.egroups.com- Simplifying group communications




------------------------------------------------------------------------
What's better than getting a Great Deal?
Getting a Great Deal delivered right to your email in-box!
http://click.egroups.com/1/1239/5/_/3457/_/950049132/

-- 20 megs of disk space in your group's Document Vault
--http://www.egroups.com/docvault/bolger/?m=1
David, my knowledge of PCB's designs is limited to the ones in published
in BWAOM and in Dynamite Payson's books, as well as to those whose plans
are being sold by CSB and Dynamite Payson (plus several others which
appeared in old issue of the CSD Newsletters).
Unespectedly enough, I vote for Micro as first and for the sheet-ply
Chebacco as close second.
Stan has already said much on Micro: it's the only real pocket cruiser
less than 5 meters LOA, period. Simple to build, safe, seaworthy
(exceptionally seaworthy for its size), performant, roomy, comfortable.
I still don't know for sure about how it goes on and off a trailer: I
suspect it's a pig to launch and retrieve, but then Gregg Carlson (who
I'm sure trails, launches and retrieves is 44' ketch too) says that you
can launch it in ankle deep water...
Regarding the Chebacco, it's "social status" is higher than the Micro's:
it's beautiful, fast, shallow draft, luxurious cockpit, the ideal family
daysailer. I was very close to go for the Chebacco (and I might do that
in the future) but the Micro is too appealing to me. A quasi-perfect
boat, as there's no perfect boat, except Luna Rossa ;-)
Best, Pippo

David Ryan ha scritto:
>
> FBBB --
>
> Since it's still too cold to build, I offer up the following in the
> hopes of stimulating lively discussion.
>
> In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
> the greatest return on investment?
>
> Answers will be graded on a curve. Extra points for ranting and raving.
>
> YIBB,
>
> David Ryan
> Minister of Information and Culture
> Crumbling Empire Productions
> (212) 247-0296
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Shop for your Valentine at eGroups!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/1149/5/_/3457/_/950027027/
>
> -- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
> --http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=bolger&m=1
>It seems to me that between the racing accolades, adventures, and never
>ending internet fame Mr.Fatchen has done well by his 12 sheets of
>plywood.
>-Tim B.

Given his penchant for recklessness and self-promotion, (wadda yew
expect from an Assie,) I suspect Mr. Fatchen could have accomplished
2 of the three in an elegant punt ;-)

So far, I'd say the Micro is winning the day. But I'd still like
someone to offer up an argument for a BIG boat. Doesn't anybody have
some half-build, hole in the ocean to be that they want to "explain."

YIBB,

David Ryan
Minister of Information and Culture
Crumbling Empire Productions
(212) 247-0296
It seems to me that between the racing accolades, adventures, and never
ending internet fame Mr.Fatchen has done well by his 12 sheets of
plywood.
-Tim B.




david ryan <davi-@...> wrote:
original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/?start=2390
> FBBB --
>
> Since it's still too cold to build, I offer up the following in the
> hopes of stimulating lively discussion.
>
> In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
> the greatest return on investment?
>
> Answers will be graded on a curve. Extra points for ranting and
raving.
>
> YIBB,
>
>
> David Ryan
> Minister of Information and Culture
> Crumbling Empire Productions
> (212) 247-0296
>David, in a word, Micro.
> For the investment of a 16 foot boat, you have the return of the
>inside space of a (home built) 22 footer, and the stability of a 26
>footer. As far as the social status; you defiantly go to the top of the;
>"what the heck is that club". To the uninitiated, (in other words,
>anybody that doesn't know Phil) any sailing accomplishment appears
>greater then it really is, and brings higher praise than deserved.
> <snip>
> As has been said, "The Micro is all the boat that 95% of boaters
>need". I would give it a higher number, but then, I'm a fan.
> <snip>
>self righting, self rescuing, easily enough made that even I can do it,
>meet new people with, (as in, "hey pal, do you need all those wheel
>weights") or (Hi neighbors, come over for a beer this afternoon and I'll
>show you how we turn the hull over) And.... drum roll... STILL BE BUILT
>IN A 20 FOOT SINGLE CAR GARAGE!!!! How is that for, Bang for the buck?


I have to agree, this is a hard argument to beat, especially
considering the trailer part (which I always discount!)

OTH, if we consider how 95% of boater actually use their boats,
they'd probably be better off with no boat at all!

YIBB,

David Ryan
Minister of Information and Culture
Crumbling Empire Productions
(212) 247-0296
David, in a word, Micro.
Stan, Snow Goose
PS: At least I'm consistent!!
For the investment of a 16 foot boat, you have the return of the
inside space of a (home built) 22 footer, and the stability of a 26
footer. As far as the social status; you defiantly go to the top of the;
"what the heck is that club". To the uninitiated, (in other words,
anybody that doesn't know Phil) any sailing accomplishment appears
greater then it really is, and brings higher praise than deserved.
For me, the greatest thing I favor about the micro, is the fact that
when building it, there is the freedom to express your self with a mass
of modifications without changing Bolger's overall design and benefit
package that the hull shape provides. Look at the Micros on the web,
you'll see a different hatch here, a change in the cockpit there, even a
fantastic keyed keel, but where the sail meets the air and where the
boat meets the water, everything is still as drawn. (as well it should
be) ((except for the Navigator, a Micro on steroids)) the ultimate
modification!
As has been said, "The Micro is all the boat that 95% of boaters
need". I would give it a higher number, but then, I'm a fan.
How many boats can be trailered to the lake, be setup in a half hour
or less, be big enough and stabile enough for the family outing, be
single handed along the coastal water way, have a comfortable enough
cockpit for you and a buddy to weekend fish off of, spend an extended
river cruise on, runs well on a 4 to 5 HP outboard, be self bailing,
self righting, self rescuing, easily enough made that even I can do it,
meet new people with, (as in, "hey pal, do you need all those wheel
weights") or (Hi neighbors, come over for a beer this afternoon and I'll
show you how we turn the hull over) And.... drum roll... STILL BE BUILT
IN A 20 FOOT SINGLE CAR GARAGE!!!! How is that for, Bang for the buck?
There is much, much more I could add, but I wanted to quit at just a
rant and leave the raving to the more articulate among us.
Stan of the MICRO, Snow Goose.
>david ryan <davi-@...> wrote:
>snip
> >
> > I have a decidedly "hill-billy" way of putting my teal on the roof of
> > my honda mini-car. If the cops every stopped my, I think I'd be
> > executed on the spot. I always put banjo music in the tape deck.
> >
>I'm curious. I've seen a lot of things leave a car roof in a scary way,
>though usually they are just chunks of ice. Hope it's secure. My
>parental units once sent a door flying at 60mph. Fortunately no one was
>in the way. I resolved then to be better with ropes and knots.

I've had some beautiful disasemblies too, the best involving a '76 VW
van, 2 kayaks, 5 bikes and 3 surfboards at 55mpm on I-5.

My "hillbilly" set up is a set of softracks (straps, clips, foam,)
made for holding a surfboard or two onto a car. What I do is use the
softracks to hold a couple of 2x4's on the roof, then tie the teal to
the 2x4's. Once everything is tied down, I drive on the shoulder at
about 20mph with the hazzard on

>Be careful not to let this come to the attention of the boat building
>companies (with possible exception of canoe outfits). They might make
>you move to the third world. Do you want to subvert the system of never
>being happy with what you have? In my boating area I have seen a 20+
>foot deep v planing in circles at a spot where the water was only 100
>or 150 feet wide. I see a lot of boats with 100+ horsepower motors. I
>can ROW a scull from one end of the area to the other in 45 minutes
>(not counting the areas too small for large outboards).

Oh no, don't you start lumping me in with the anticonsumptionistas! I
definately want a bigger boat, a much bigger boat!

However, if you're boat's too big to get on and off the car yourself,
you ought to have a beach you can leave it on. If it's too big to get
on and off the beach yourself, you ought to have some water you can
leave it in. Dependence on cars rarely solves more problems than it
creates. (If I could put all the money I spend running, maintaining,
and insuring my '92 honda over the last 8 years, I could have a hell
of a nice boat!)

YIBB,

David Ryan
Minister of Information and Culture
Crumbling Empire Productions
(212) 247-0296
Well, the rower sits on the 'rowing thwart' and passengers can sit on the
seats that run for and aft. The rowing thwart is immediately aft of the
daggerboard case. Gypsy seems to sail just fine with 3 adult sized people
on board. In a stiff wind (don't know how fast) the boat actually seemed to
behave a little better with the added weight. But it is too heavy to
cartop.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lincoln Ross [SMTP:lincolnr@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 3:57 PM
> To:bolger@...
> Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation
>
> "fries, john" <john.frie-@...> wrote:
> original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/?start=2395
> SNIP I build a Gypsy last spring and have been very pleased
> > with it. I have had 3 adults (relatively comfortably) on board for
> sailing.
> > Have rowed with two on board. Recommended.
> >
> > >
> I know about the Gypsy, but it looked to me as if with two people you
> had to sit on the daggerboard to row, at least that's what it looked
> like to me on the drawings. Also, drawings show a displacement of
> something like 425 lbs, I think, but that would be our crew weight
> (with picnic stuff). Was hoping to stay below max displacement to keep
> sailing lively, or does it turn out to be just fine with the extra
> load?. Also, with all the fancy stuff that I don't feel like building,
> I bet it's too heavy to put on car.
>
> Probably the best match for my req'ts as designed is Michalak Piccup,
> but to my eye it's not very pretty and I'll bet it's not as fast as
> some of these other boats. Looks like a nice design functionally,
> however. To be realistic about my building ambitions, maybe Twixt (or
> is that Tween, I get confused).
>
> However, I've heard good things about Gypsy from people who should know.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Unique Valentine gifts, available now at eGroups.
>http://click.egroups.com/1/1154/5/_/3457/_/950043408/
>
> -- Check out your group's private Chat room
> --http://www.egroups.com/ChatPage?listName=bolger&m=1
>
david ryan <davi-@...> wrote:
snip
>
> I have a decidedly "hill-billy" way of putting my teal on the roof of
> my honda mini-car. If the cops every stopped my, I think I'd be
> executed on the spot. I always put banjo music in the tape deck.
>
I'm curious. I've seen a lot of things leave a car roof in a scary way,
though usually they are just chunks of ice. Hope it's secure. My
parental units once sent a door flying at 60mph. Fortunately no one was
in the way. I resolved then to be better with ropes and knots.
> When I leave my boat at the beach,snip
wish I could do that
> snip but creating the path of least
> resistance between your obligation and your boating is probably even
> more important.
>
> In addition to the "boat/no boat" calculus that leads many of us hear
> to hours-days-years of enjoyment in a Brick, I think there is an
> equally "watertime/no watertime" equation. A boat that's too heavy to
> get on and off the roof easily definitely weights the scale on the
> wrong side.
>
> Snip
Be careful not to let this come to the attention of the boat building
companies (with possible exception of canoe outfits). They might make
you move to the third world. Do you want to subvert the system of never
being happy with what you have? In my boating area I have seen a 20+
foot deep v planing in circles at a spot where the water was only 100
or 150 feet wide. I see a lot of boats with 100+ horsepower motors. I
can ROW a scull from one end of the area to the other in 45 minutes
(not counting the areas too small for large outboards).
Lots of small boats are being suggested for best roi. I would suggest
considering economies of scale. With the Tennessee, you have to deal with a
trailer, but you can pull this thirty foot motor cruiser with a smallish
car. The total cost if you get a used motor can be under two grand, and the
mileage can exceed 15 mpg. I realize that most of the guys on this DG are
sail or paddle/oar oriented, but consider this: the Tennessee comes with
head, galley, spacious cockpit, huge lazaret, and sleeps two. She draws
four, count 'em, four inches of water. Lets figure the cost of this boat
against the cost of a typical cruiser with these dimensions and
accommodations. I get about fifty to one. Can any of you other guys say
that about your nominees?

Chuck Leinweber
Duckworks Magazine
http://www.duckworksmagazine.com


----- Original Message -----
From: David Ryan <david@...>
To: <bolger@egroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 8:22 AM
Subject: [bolger] Beer-Fueled speculation


> FBBB --
>
> Since it's still too cold to build, I offer up the following in the
> hopes of stimulating lively discussion.
>
> In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
> the greatest return on investment?
>
> Answers will be graded on a curve. Extra points for ranting and raving.
>
> YIBB,
>
>
> David Ryan
> Minister of Information and Culture
> Crumbling Empire Productions
> (212) 247-0296
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Shop for your Valentine at eGroups!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/1149/5/_/3457/_/950027027/
>
> -- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
> --http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=bolger&m=1
>
>
"fries, john" <john.frie-@...> wrote:
original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/?start=2395
SNIP I build a Gypsy last spring and have been very pleased
> with it. I have had 3 adults (relatively comfortably) on board for
sailing.
> Have rowed with two on board. Recommended.
>
> >
I know about the Gypsy, but it looked to me as if with two people you
had to sit on the daggerboard to row, at least that's what it looked
like to me on the drawings. Also, drawings show a displacement of
something like 425 lbs, I think, but that would be our crew weight
(with picnic stuff). Was hoping to stay below max displacement to keep
sailing lively, or does it turn out to be just fine with the extra
load?. Also, with all the fancy stuff that I don't feel like building,
I bet it's too heavy to put on car.

Probably the best match for my req'ts as designed is Michalak Piccup,
but to my eye it's not very pretty and I'll bet it's not as fast as
some of these other boats. Looks like a nice design functionally,
however. To be realistic about my building ambitions, maybe Twixt (or
is that Tween, I get confused).

However, I've heard good things about Gypsy from people who should know.
>Lots of small boats are being suggested for best roi. I would suggest
>considering economies of scale. With the Tennessee, you have to deal with a
>trailer, but you can pull this thirty foot motor cruiser with a smallish
>car. The total cost if you get a used motor can be under two grand, and the
>mileage can exceed 15 mpg. I realize that most of the guys on this DG are
>sail or paddle/oar oriented, but consider this: the Tennessee comes with
>head, galley, spacious cockpit, huge lazaret, and sleeps two. She draws
>four, count 'em, four inches of water. Lets figure the cost of this boat
>against the cost of a typical cruiser with these dimensions and
>accommodations. I get about fifty to one. Can any of you other guys say
>that about your nominees?
>

Way to through down, Chuck! Now we're getting somewhere!

David Ryan
Minister of Information and Culture
Crumbling Empire Productions
(212) 247-0296
>In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
>buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
>construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
>the greatest return on investment?
>
Right! You asked for it! I've built half a dozen boats:

9' Percy Blandford Curlew (gunter rigged sloop)
15' Iain Oughtred Seahorse flatiron skiff, lug rigged
6.5' trad lapstrake (clinker) pram dinghy by Alan Buchanan
13' Payson Pirogue - open double-paddle canoe designed by PCB
Chebacco 20 by PCB
June Bug, by PCB

From this (admittedly limited) experience over the past couple of decades, I
have no hesitation in announcing that the Payson Pirogue has more hours
under her keel than any of the others, for a number of reasons:

Easily cartoppable (single handed)
You can take it anywhere, and launch it where there's 4" of water
I take it everywhere on holiday, without hassle or anxiety
I've crossed open water in it (favourable conditions, of course)
It'll take two people
Masochists can camp under it
You can portage it over shallows (single handed)
You can fish from it
It's surprisingly fast (low wetted area)
It can be built from 2 sheets of cheapo ply ($60 including glass tape and
resin)
It takes (at most) two weekends to build it

So - It's my most beloved boat.

Bill Samson
david ryan <davi-@...> wrote:


>
> You can talk all day about creating the path of least resistance for
> the water to travel around your hull, but creatin the path of least
> resistance between your obligation and your boating is probably even
> more important.
>

I haven't yet found that path. I had a plastic 14' dinghy that I
trailered, and it was a pain to set up and put away. Plus the trailer
was just one more thing to worry about and take care of and deal with.
So I sold it (it wasn't a good boat anyway).

When my wife and I got an old cabin cruiser, we had it in a covered
moorage. That was not all that satisfactory either: you are stuck
boating the same stretch of water each time, and you pay for the
moorage every month, including winter, whether you are using the boat
or not.


> In addition to the "boat/no boat" calculus that leads many of us hear
> to hours-days-years of enjoyment in a Brick, I think there is an
> equally "watertime/no watertime" equation. A boat that's too heavy to
> get on and off the roof easily definitely weights the scale on the
> wrong side.
>
> During the Summer, all manner of boats anchor at the South End of
> Lake Montauk, but all but the working boat disappear when the weather
> turns brisk. I can help wonder how well an AS29 would weather the
> winter rolled up the beach on logs egyption style.
>
>
> David Ryan
> Minister of Information and Culture
> Crumbling Empire Productions
> (212) 247-0296
>I have a friend with a Gypsy, who worked out a method of cartopping. He
>stores the boat upright, under the garage rafters, lowering it directly on
>to his station wagon's roof, still upright. He has a customized sheet of
>ply on the roof racks with locating holes, and a roller affair built at the
>rear. To get the boat on the ground, he slides it off the rear, over this
>roller. At the stern of the boat, he has attaches a small 2 wheeled dolly
>using the gudgeons to locate and hold it. Then he can lift the bow, and
>wheel the boat to the water. Going home, he reverses the whole operation.
>
>He can load and unload without help, but it's still heavy work, and not
>quick. As a result, he doesn't go out as often as he'd like.


I have a decidedly "hill-billy" way of putting my teal on the roof of
my honda mini-car. If the cops every stopped my, I think I'd be
executed on the spot. I always put banjo music in the tape deck.

When I leave my boat at the beach, I get out 4-5 times a week. I even
leave the oars and a handline so if I'm checking the surf/surfing and
there's a blitz, I can get on it. If I try dragging her back and
forth, the number falls percipitously.

You can talk all day about creating the path of least resistance for
the water to travel around your hull, but creatin the path of least
resistance between your obligation and your boating is probably even
more important.

In addition to the "boat/no boat" calculus that leads many of us hear
to hours-days-years of enjoyment in a Brick, I think there is an
equally "watertime/no watertime" equation. A boat that's too heavy to
get on and off the roof easily definitely weights the scale on the
wrong side.

During the Summer, all manner of boats anchor at the South End of
Lake Montauk, but all but the working boat disappear when the weather
turns brisk. I can help wonder how well an AS29 would weather the
winter rolled up the beach on logs egyption style.


David Ryan
Minister of Information and Culture
Crumbling Empire Productions
(212) 247-0296
That's what I thought. Too bad, because it is beautiful, my favorite in
the Payson catalog. That puts the 16' pirogue back at the top of my
list. It seems that it would provide lots of bang for not much bucks. I
want something that can be stored on slings from the ceiling of my
one-car garage, but that is bigger than a punt.


"fries, john" <john.frie-@...> wrote:
original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/?start=2399
> I have muscleed it off its trailer and dragged (drug??) it to the
water.
> Truthfully, probably too heavy for cartopping although two strong
guys could
> handle it.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Carter Kennedy [SMTP:jkck@...]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 12:40 PM
> > To:bolger@...
> > Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation
> >
> > "fries, john" <john.frie-@...> wrote:
> > original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/?start=2395
> > > To answer your question about a design similar to the Cartopper,
when
> > I look
> > > at the plans for Cartopper I am struck by its similarity (at
least in
> > hull
> > > design) with Gypsy. Gypsy has very similar construction and is
15' x
> > 4'4"
> > > and rows very well. I build a Gypsy last spring and have been
very
> > pleased
> > > with it. I have had 3 adults (relatively comfortably) on board
for
> > sailing.
> > > Have rowed with two on board. Recommended.
> >
> > Is Gypsy light enought to car-top?
> >
SNIP
FBBB --

Ah yes, trailerability. Nasty parameter indeed. I used to hate how
many miles we'd drive to a couple of miles of whitewater. Cars ruin
everything.

I have a deep suspicion that the need to be trailerable ruins a good
many smaller boats, and forces many of us to settle for boats much
smaller than we really "need."

We had a 23x7 skiff that we fished commercially offshore in SoCal. It
was barely enough boa for the job, but was still way, way, way too
much to drag behind a car. I swear dragging it from Cal or Or aged
him 5 years in 3 days. When it came time to sell it, we motored back
to SoCal (better market) and had my mother drag the empty trailer
down I-5.

David Ryan
Minister of Information and Culture
Crumbling Empire Productions
(212) 247-0296
I have a friend with a Gypsy, who worked out a method of cartopping. He
stores the boat upright, under the garage rafters, lowering it directly on
to his station wagon's roof, still upright. He has a customized sheet of
ply on the roof racks with locating holes, and a roller affair built at the
rear. To get the boat on the ground, he slides it off the rear, over this
roller. At the stern of the boat, he has attaches a small 2 wheeled dolly
using the gudgeons to locate and hold it. Then he can lift the bow, and
wheel the boat to the water. Going home, he reverses the whole operation.

He can load and unload without help, but it's still heavy work, and not
quick. As a result, he doesn't go out as often as he'd like.

Jamie Orr

-----Original Message-----
From: Fries, John [mailto:John.Fries@...]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 10:03 AM
To: 'bolger@egroups.com'
Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation


I have muscleed it off its trailer and dragged (drug??) it to the water.
Truthfully, probably too heavy for cartopping although two strong guys could
handle it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carter Kennedy [SMTP:jkck@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 12:40 PM
> To:bolger@...
> Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation
>
> "fries, john" <john.frie-@...> wrote:
> original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/?start=2395
> > To answer your question about a design similar to the Cartopper, when
> I look
> > at the plans for Cartopper I am struck by its similarity (at least in
> hull
> > design) with Gypsy. Gypsy has very similar construction and is 15' x
> 4'4"
> > and rows very well. I build a Gypsy last spring and have been very
> pleased
> > with it. I have had 3 adults (relatively comfortably) on board for
> sailing.
> > Have rowed with two on board. Recommended.
>
> Is Gypsy light enought to car-top?
>
> For bangs for bucks, I say no motors! And no trailers! Of course,
> having power and enough size for a head and a bed increase the bang
> factor without necessarily increasing bucks by a great amount. Okay,
> you can have a little outboard. If you are going into the
> motor-and-trailer size, why not maximize your sailing fun and go beyond
> the Micro to the Chebacco? Maybe a cruising Chebacco. Then you would't
> have to pour that keel!
>
> There is a small rant for you-- I was once owned by a Chris-Craft
> inboard.
>
> Carter K.
>
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Lincoln Ross [SMTP:lincolnr@...]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 11:56 AM
> > > To:bolger@...
> > > Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation
> > >
> > > No beer here, so maybe my opinion doesn't count, but I think Mr.
> Long
> > > has gotten an awful lot of entertainment from his project (a brick).
> > > Not sure, but I think I heart a faint "what the heck is that?"
> shouted
> > > from the direction of Jamaica Plain one time in 1998. Is social
> status
> > > to be maximized or minimized? I've gotten a lot of entertainment
> just
> > > thinking about a brick, though I think I'd actually go more in the
> June
> > > Bug direction as I like to row. Current project is a Nymph, but I
> was
> > > foolish enough to take it over from someone else, so it's more work
> > > than it should be. It does sit nice and quiet on top of car at
> highway
> > > speeds, which I'll bet a Brick won't.
> > >
> > > Anyone know a Bolger design similar to a Car Topper except rows well
> > > with two people, possibly a tad longer? In more ambitions moments
> > > sometimes think of doing a stripped out and lightened Sweet Pea with
> > > daggerboard, transom and outboard rudder. All pipe dream, of course.
> > >
> > > david ryan <davi-@...> wrote:
> > > snip
> > > > In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> > > > buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> > > > construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat
> yields
> > > > the greatest return on investment?
> > > >snip
> > > > YIBB,
> > > > snip
> > > > David Ryan
> > > > Minister of Information and Culture
> > > > Crumbling Empire Productions
> > > > (212) 247-0296
> > >
> > >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Join eGroups eLerts to Save!
> Sign up for one or two today!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/1235/5/_/3457/_/950031627/
>
> -- 20 megs of disk space in your group's Document Vault
> --http://www.egroups.com/docvault/bolger/?m=1
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
What's better than getting a Great Deal?

Getting a Great Deal delivered right to your email in-box!
http://click.egroups.com/1/1233/5/_/3457/_/950032997/

-- Create a poll/survey for your group!
--http://www.egroups.com/vote?listname=bolger&m=1
I have muscleed it off its trailer and dragged (drug??) it to the water.
Truthfully, probably too heavy for cartopping although two strong guys could
handle it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carter Kennedy [SMTP:jkck@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 12:40 PM
> To:bolger@...
> Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation
>
> "fries, john" <john.frie-@...> wrote:
> original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/?start=2395
> > To answer your question about a design similar to the Cartopper, when
> I look
> > at the plans for Cartopper I am struck by its similarity (at least in
> hull
> > design) with Gypsy. Gypsy has very similar construction and is 15' x
> 4'4"
> > and rows very well. I build a Gypsy last spring and have been very
> pleased
> > with it. I have had 3 adults (relatively comfortably) on board for
> sailing.
> > Have rowed with two on board. Recommended.
>
> Is Gypsy light enought to car-top?
>
> For bangs for bucks, I say no motors! And no trailers! Of course,
> having power and enough size for a head and a bed increase the bang
> factor without necessarily increasing bucks by a great amount. Okay,
> you can have a little outboard. If you are going into the
> motor-and-trailer size, why not maximize your sailing fun and go beyond
> the Micro to the Chebacco? Maybe a cruising Chebacco. Then you would't
> have to pour that keel!
>
> There is a small rant for you-- I was once owned by a Chris-Craft
> inboard.
>
> Carter K.
>
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Lincoln Ross [SMTP:lincolnr@...]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 11:56 AM
> > > To:bolger@...
> > > Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation
> > >
> > > No beer here, so maybe my opinion doesn't count, but I think Mr.
> Long
> > > has gotten an awful lot of entertainment from his project (a brick).
> > > Not sure, but I think I heart a faint "what the heck is that?"
> shouted
> > > from the direction of Jamaica Plain one time in 1998. Is social
> status
> > > to be maximized or minimized? I've gotten a lot of entertainment
> just
> > > thinking about a brick, though I think I'd actually go more in the
> June
> > > Bug direction as I like to row. Current project is a Nymph, but I
> was
> > > foolish enough to take it over from someone else, so it's more work
> > > than it should be. It does sit nice and quiet on top of car at
> highway
> > > speeds, which I'll bet a Brick won't.
> > >
> > > Anyone know a Bolger design similar to a Car Topper except rows well
> > > with two people, possibly a tad longer? In more ambitions moments
> > > sometimes think of doing a stripped out and lightened Sweet Pea with
> > > daggerboard, transom and outboard rudder. All pipe dream, of course.
> > >
> > > david ryan <davi-@...> wrote:
> > > snip
> > > > In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> > > > buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> > > > construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat
> yields
> > > > the greatest return on investment?
> > > >snip
> > > > YIBB,
> > > > snip
> > > > David Ryan
> > > > Minister of Information and Culture
> > > > Crumbling Empire Productions
> > > > (212) 247-0296
> > >
> > >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Join eGroups eLerts to Save!
> Sign up for one or two today!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/1235/5/_/3457/_/950031627/
>
> -- 20 megs of disk space in your group's Document Vault
> --http://www.egroups.com/docvault/bolger/?m=1
>
"fries, john" <john.frie-@...> wrote:
original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/bolger/?start=2395
> To answer your question about a design similar to the Cartopper, when
I look
> at the plans for Cartopper I am struck by its similarity (at least in
hull
> design) with Gypsy. Gypsy has very similar construction and is 15' x
4'4"
> and rows very well. I build a Gypsy last spring and have been very
pleased
> with it. I have had 3 adults (relatively comfortably) on board for
sailing.
> Have rowed with two on board. Recommended.

Is Gypsy light enought to car-top?

For bangs for bucks, I say no motors! And no trailers! Of course,
having power and enough size for a head and a bed increase the bang
factor without necessarily increasing bucks by a great amount. Okay,
you can have a little outboard. If you are going into the
motor-and-trailer size, why not maximize your sailing fun and go beyond
the Micro to the Chebacco? Maybe a cruising Chebacco. Then you would't
have to pour that keel!

There is a small rant for you-- I was once owned by a Chris-Craft
inboard.

Carter K.

>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lincoln Ross [SMTP:lincolnr@...]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 11:56 AM
> > To:bolger@...
> > Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation
> >
> > No beer here, so maybe my opinion doesn't count, but I think Mr.
Long
> > has gotten an awful lot of entertainment from his project (a brick).
> > Not sure, but I think I heart a faint "what the heck is that?"
shouted
> > from the direction of Jamaica Plain one time in 1998. Is social
status
> > to be maximized or minimized? I've gotten a lot of entertainment
just
> > thinking about a brick, though I think I'd actually go more in the
June
> > Bug direction as I like to row. Current project is a Nymph, but I
was
> > foolish enough to take it over from someone else, so it's more work
> > than it should be. It does sit nice and quiet on top of car at
highway
> > speeds, which I'll bet a Brick won't.
> >
> > Anyone know a Bolger design similar to a Car Topper except rows well
> > with two people, possibly a tad longer? In more ambitions moments
> > sometimes think of doing a stripped out and lightened Sweet Pea with
> > daggerboard, transom and outboard rudder. All pipe dream, of course.
> >
> > david ryan <davi-@...> wrote:
> > snip
> > > In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> > > buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> > > construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat
yields
> > > the greatest return on investment?
> > >snip
> > > YIBB,
> > > snip
> > > David Ryan
> > > Minister of Information and Culture
> > > Crumbling Empire Productions
> > > (212) 247-0296
> >
> >
Hey, that sounds like a good notion!

From my limited experience, I'll nominate the Elegant Punt -- 8 feet of pure
function. We've had one for three summers now, and been totally pleased
with it.

cost to build -- dirt cheap -- two sheets of ply, two or three 2 x4's ripped
up, ring nails and paint.

ease of construction -- truly simple -- no jig, self-aligning, no icky
resins required -- one of, if not the first, instant boat, so it's got to be
easy. (which was the first, BTW?) I chose it so an 8 year old could help
build it.

usability -- very high -- easily cartopped, light, kids can handle (and pull
out of water), holds family of four in a pinch, can live on car in summer,
or be loaded in seconds, and be tossed into the water anytime. The
lengthwise seat lets us more or less balance it for any combination of
passengers (200# dad in back, 60# son rowing is okay if dad doesn't lean
back.) Haven't sailed it yet, but that's an option.

social status -- um, got me there.... Luckily, the owner is only 11, and
has his own scale for judging these things.

Elegantly punting in the Royal Roads,

Jamie Orr

----Original Message-----
From: David Ryan [mailto:david@...]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 8:23 AM
To:bolger@egroups.com
Subject: [bolger] Beer-Fueled speculation


FBBB --

Since it's still too cold to build, I offer up the following in the
hopes of stimulating lively discussion.

In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
the greatest return on investment?

Answers will be graded on a curve. Extra points for ranting and raving.

YIBB,


David Ryan
Minister of Information and Culture
Crumbling Empire Productions
(212) 247-0296

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shop for your Valentine at eGroups!
http://click.egroups.com/1/1149/5/_/3457/_/950027027/

-- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
--http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=bolger&m=1
To answer your question about a design similar to the Cartopper, when I look
at the plans for Cartopper I am struck by its similarity (at least in hull
design) with Gypsy. Gypsy has very similar construction and is 15' x 4'4"
and rows very well. I build a Gypsy last spring and have been very pleased
with it. I have had 3 adults (relatively comfortably) on board for sailing.
Have rowed with two on board. Recommended.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lincoln Ross [SMTP:lincolnr@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 11:56 AM
> To:bolger@...
> Subject: [bolger] Re: Beer-Fueled speculation
>
> No beer here, so maybe my opinion doesn't count, but I think Mr. Long
> has gotten an awful lot of entertainment from his project (a brick).
> Not sure, but I think I heart a faint "what the heck is that?" shouted
> from the direction of Jamaica Plain one time in 1998. Is social status
> to be maximized or minimized? I've gotten a lot of entertainment just
> thinking about a brick, though I think I'd actually go more in the June
> Bug direction as I like to row. Current project is a Nymph, but I was
> foolish enough to take it over from someone else, so it's more work
> than it should be. It does sit nice and quiet on top of car at highway
> speeds, which I'll bet a Brick won't.
>
> Anyone know a Bolger design similar to a Car Topper except rows well
> with two people, possibly a tad longer? In more ambitions moments
> sometimes think of doing a stripped out and lightened Sweet Pea with
> daggerboard, transom and outboard rudder. All pipe dream, of course.
>
> david ryan <davi-@...> wrote:
> snip
> > In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> > buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> > construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
> > the greatest return on investment?
> >snip
> > YIBB,
> > snip
> > David Ryan
> > Minister of Information and Culture
> > Crumbling Empire Productions
> > (212) 247-0296
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Join eGroups eLerts to Save!
> Sign up for one or two today!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/1229/5/_/3457/_/950028944/
>
> -- Talk to your group with your own voice!
> --http://www.egroups.com/VoiceChatPage?listName=bolger&m=1
>
I yield to Chuck Merrell's gushing devotion to Micro (and I like PCB's gauzy
account of a couple in a Micro approaching landfall in France after an
intimate cruise... oh, to be thirty - or fifty - again).

Don Hodges

----- Original Message -----
From: David Ryan <david@...>
To: <bolger@egroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 10:22 AM
Subject: [bolger] Beer-Fueled speculation


> FBBB --
>
> Since it's still too cold to build, I offer up the following in the
> hopes of stimulating lively discussion.
>
> In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
> the greatest return on investment?
>
> Answers will be graded on a curve. Extra points for ranting and raving.
>
> YIBB,
>
>
> David Ryan
> Minister of Information and Culture
> Crumbling Empire Productions
> (212) 247-0296
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Shop for your Valentine at eGroups!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/1149/5/_/3457/_/950027027/
>
> -- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
> --http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=bolger&m=1
>
>
>
>
>
>Anyone know a Bolger design similar to a Car Topper except rows well
>with two people, possibly a tad longer? In more ambitions moments
>sometimes think of doing a stripped out and lightened Sweet Pea with
>daggerboard, transom and outboard rudder. All pipe dream, of course.

sounds like a gypsy.

David Ryan
Minister of Information and Culture
Crumbling Empire Productions
(212) 247-0296
No beer here, so maybe my opinion doesn't count, but I think Mr. Long
has gotten an awful lot of entertainment from his project (a brick).
Not sure, but I think I heart a faint "what the heck is that?" shouted
from the direction of Jamaica Plain one time in 1998. Is social status
to be maximized or minimized? I've gotten a lot of entertainment just
thinking about a brick, though I think I'd actually go more in the June
Bug direction as I like to row. Current project is a Nymph, but I was
foolish enough to take it over from someone else, so it's more work
than it should be. It does sit nice and quiet on top of car at highway
speeds, which I'll bet a Brick won't.

Anyone know a Bolger design similar to a Car Topper except rows well
with two people, possibly a tad longer? In more ambitions moments
sometimes think of doing a stripped out and lightened Sweet Pea with
daggerboard, transom and outboard rudder. All pipe dream, of course.

david ryan <davi-@...> wrote:
snip
> In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
> buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
> construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
> the greatest return on investment?
>snip
> YIBB,
> snip
> David Ryan
> Minister of Information and Culture
> Crumbling Empire Productions
> (212) 247-0296
FBBB --

Since it's still too cold to build, I offer up the following in the
hopes of stimulating lively discussion.

In your opinion, which PCB design offers the most "bang for the
buck?" In a poly-dimensional matrix of cost to build, easy of
construction, usability, social status, etc. which Bolger boat yields
the greatest return on investment?

Answers will be graded on a curve. Extra points for ranting and raving.

YIBB,


David Ryan
Minister of Information and Culture
Crumbling Empire Productions
(212) 247-0296