Re: Jochems under power
I wonder if Bolger has done the filleted bow version of Jochems?
I would guess this would be essential for a non-heeling version of
that design.
A report in Watercraft said the Champlain was quite noisy in a chop,
and there is a filleted mod for her...also Windermere.
I imagine she would make a quite useful low speed powerboat.
DonB
--- Inbolger@yahoogroups.com, "Jeremy Marshall"
<darkcitybooks@y...> wrote:
I would guess this would be essential for a non-heeling version of
that design.
A report in Watercraft said the Champlain was quite noisy in a chop,
and there is a filleted mod for her...also Windermere.
I imagine she would make a quite useful low speed powerboat.
DonB
--- Inbolger@yahoogroups.com, "Jeremy Marshall"
<darkcitybooks@y...> wrote:
> I've seen the video, but would anyone expand upon Jochemsperformance
> under power alone, assuming the boat is built as designed (i.e.
> outboard well off center line)? I presume performance under power
> would improve if ballast tanks were empty. Any thoughts?
I've seen the video, but would anyone expand upon Jochems performance
under power alone, assuming the boat is built as designed (i.e.
outboard well off center line)? I presume performance under power
would improve if ballast tanks were empty. Any thoughts?
under power alone, assuming the boat is built as designed (i.e.
outboard well off center line)? I presume performance under power
would improve if ballast tanks were empty. Any thoughts?