Re: The Insolent 81?
> Too big for towing behind a car or light truck. But fifth wheelwill
> flatbed traillers now routinely exceed 50 feet. Buy an old Kenworth
> or Mack, and tow away. It's not that the 1 60, 1 81, or whatever
> be traillered every weekend, it just has the capability forWith big boats on a trailer, the width is more of a problem than the
> interstate travel.
>
> Bruce Hector
>http://www.brucesboats.com
length and will probably be the limiting factor.
Charles
--- Inbolger@yahoogroups.com, "Susan Davis" <futabachan@y...> wrote:
She'd be too big to trailer
Too big for towing behind a car or light truck. But fifth wheel
flatbed traillers now routinely exceed 50 feet. Buy an old Kenworth
or Mack, and tow away. It's not that the 1 60, 1 81, or whatever will
be traillered every weekend, it just has the capability for
interstate travel.
Bruce Hector
http://www.brucesboats.com
> The articles defines a "superyacht" as anything over 80 feet . . .Well, if you're going that big, why not make it a MaxZ86? The I60
>
> It'd be fun to see a more or less home-buildable Bolger boat that
> fit the definition.
was intended to be a cheap entry into big boat races; why not go for
the really big game? She'd be too big to trailer, but could probably
be made seaworthy enough for ocean racing, with liveaboard
accomodations to boot.
-- Sue --
(hmm....)
--
Susan Davis <futabachan@...>
At the risk of stretching a good thing to excess: In today's New
York Times, there's an article about the folks who work as crew on
the yachts of the rich and famous. The articles defines a
"superyacht" as anything over 80 feet . . .
It'd be fun to see a more or less home-buildable Bolger boat that fit the
definition.
York Times, there's an article about the folks who work as crew on
the yachts of the rich and famous. The articles defines a
"superyacht" as anything over 80 feet . . .
It'd be fun to see a more or less home-buildable Bolger boat that fit the
definition.