Re: [bolger] Re: Old Shoe first, quick and dirty, then a Micro?
I hope that this doesn't sound too much like heresy
but surely the way to go if you want to learn to sail
is to pick up something cheap on ebay - even if it
wants a little bit of work it should still be a lot
cheaper than building from new.That should show you
whether or not
A)You like sailing
B)What you like/don't like about that particular boat
or rig.You could also experiment with different rigs
relatively economically.
Having done that you should be in a better position to
judge which of Phil's designs would suit you best.
To give you an example I picked up a Lysander17 and
trailer for £114 (about $200).The Lysander is a Percy
Blandford design from 1963 and as far as I can judge
at this moment wants the cabin fitting out and a
repaint.Cost to build new in UK (plans
available)about$3000.It gives me a bit more
flexibility for when I have a crack at a new boat
since the Lysander is narrow canal friendly and could
well be kept for that purpose.Otherwise I still fancy
Weston Martyr but it's a bit big.
Cheers
Andy
but surely the way to go if you want to learn to sail
is to pick up something cheap on ebay - even if it
wants a little bit of work it should still be a lot
cheaper than building from new.That should show you
whether or not
A)You like sailing
B)What you like/don't like about that particular boat
or rig.You could also experiment with different rigs
relatively economically.
Having done that you should be in a better position to
judge which of Phil's designs would suit you best.
To give you an example I picked up a Lysander17 and
trailer for £114 (about $200).The Lysander is a Percy
Blandford design from 1963 and as far as I can judge
at this moment wants the cabin fitting out and a
repaint.Cost to build new in UK (plans
available)about$3000.It gives me a bit more
flexibility for when I have a crack at a new boat
since the Lysander is narrow canal friendly and could
well be kept for that purpose.Otherwise I still fancy
Weston Martyr but it's a bit big.
Cheers
Andy
----- Original Message -----
> From: "mark" <planzman@y...>
> To: <bolger@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 2:20 PM
> Subject: [bolger] Re: Old Shoe first, quick and
dirty, then a
Micro?
>
>
> | Have you looked at a super brick? IT is fantastic
and may be the
> | third boat that I build. I am planning to start a
small pontoon
boat
> | this weekend to use on a nearby (less than 1/2
mile travel) for
> | fishing and evening cruises. Then I might build a
non Bolger
boat,
> | the Great Pelican to learn sailing with. This
boat should go
together
> | fast and give me something to put in the water
whild I am
building the
> | SB. I am amazed with the SB concept and wonder
how she sails.
She is
> | something like a Coleman pup up camper with out
the pop up. I
would
Bolger rules!!!
- no cursing, flaming, trolling, spamming, or flogging
dead horses
- stay on topic, stay on thread, punctuate, no 'Ed,
thanks, Fred' posts
- Pls add your comments at the TOP, SIGN your posts,
and snip away
- Plans: Mr. Philip C. Bolger, P.O. Box 1209,
Gloucester, MA, 01930, Fax: (978) 282-1349
- Unsubscribe:bolger-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Open discussion:
bolger_coffee_lounge-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bolger/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
bolger-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemailhttp://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
--- Inbolger@yahoogroups.com, "Will Samson" <willsamson@y...> wrote:
To Phil S. and Will S. ,
That little bit was written some time ago and Bill has
ressurected it from the mystery-archive land and posted it here in
error......a happy error I might add since it fetched up a slew of
very fond memories for me.Thanks Bill! and I am flattered too, Phil
and Will,by your kind words!
Sincerely,
Peter Lenihan,rambling fool,boat bum,consumer of fine consumables and
friend to le Moution Noir de Kingston,from along the blustery
St.Lawrence shores............
Peter,
A superb tale - Dare I say it's even better than PCB's one about the Micro in the Med? It certainly tempts me to get out my BWAOM and ponder the Micro drawings once more.
Seriously, I've eaten some horrible chow (boil-in-the-bag cuppacrap) served up on gin palaces. On one such heartburn-inducing occasion a lovely aroma of steak, onion, mushrooms and a vinaigrette dressing wafted across to us from a grassy bank near the dock, where a lone sea kayaker was sitting by his little tent cooking up a gourmet meal on his spirit stove, with a fine wine cooling alongside.**
The point of this is that as far as fine cuisine in boats goes, size doesn't matter (and may even be a disadvantage!)
Bill
** By way of a plug for sea kayaks, the storage volumes are always cool inside (evaporation of water or some such?) and an ice box is not needed to keep meat and salad fresh.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
A superb tale - Dare I say it's even better than PCB's one about the Micro in the Med? It certainly tempts me to get out my BWAOM and ponder the Micro drawings once more.
Seriously, I've eaten some horrible chow (boil-in-the-bag cuppacrap) served up on gin palaces. On one such heartburn-inducing occasion a lovely aroma of steak, onion, mushrooms and a vinaigrette dressing wafted across to us from a grassy bank near the dock, where a lone sea kayaker was sitting by his little tent cooking up a gourmet meal on his spirit stove, with a fine wine cooling alongside.**
The point of this is that as far as fine cuisine in boats goes, size doesn't matter (and may even be a disadvantage!)
Bill
** By way of a plug for sea kayaks, the storage volumes are always cool inside (evaporation of water or some such?) and an ice box is not needed to keep meat and salad fresh.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Peter, you really need to fax this to Phil and
Susanne. They will get a real kick out if it.
Phil Smith
---BllFs6@...wrote:
Susanne. They will get a real kick out if it.
Phil Smith
---BllFs6@...wrote:
>
> Bruce,
> Every once in awhile,I get into one of those
> devilish states
> where,for the complete lack of anything more
> constructive to do,I head
> over to one of the more posh yacht clubs close by
> and feign a desire
> to overnight at the guest dock.The dockmaster,more
> accustomed to gin
> palaces,usually gives something of a smirk as he
> brusquely directs me
> to a spot at the furthest end of the quest
> dock.Fortunately for
> me,this puts me right behind the sterns of a row of
> obnoxious
> yachts.Due to the odd shape and style of my boat(
> the mighty
> Micro,LESTAT) we invariably draw a fair amount of
> attention and the
> occassional member will deign to actually stroll
> over to give us a
> closer look.Of course,he knows(and we too!) that his
> fellow members
> are all looking over and listening in the quite of
> the evening air to
> hear our exchange.After the usual round of
> pleasantries,with me
> playing the goofy nut explaining the flat square
> stem etc...,he
> predictably launches into some rot about proper
> boat
> shapes.Naturally,our snot-about-the docks has the
> proper boat shape as
> do most of his experienced fellow yachtsmen. With
> something like the
> look you would expect from some elder statesman
> annunciating on the
> pityful state of national health care,he offers the
> suggestion that I
> too should"get with it,Lad!". That's just about the
> time where my
> Pesky Crew pops her head up out the companionway
> hatch,and kindly
> enquires of me whether we should be having the'97
> Chateau de Rochforte
> or perhaps the Beaujolais Nouveau with supper
> tonight.Our SAD
> (snot-about-the-docks) smiles politely and reminds
> us that the club
> has its own rather impressive selection and that
> bringing your own
> bottle to the dining room is...er..ah...well not
> exactly permitted.Oh
> shucking away,I tell him that we won't be using the
> dining room but
> will instead eat on the boat.With arched eyebrows
> and barely contained
> amusement,SAD wonders out loud about the wisdom of
> mixing sandwiches
> and wine but gives a friendly chuckle and waddles
> down the dock
> mumbling something about long ago college stunts. In
> the
> background,Pesky and I can clearly hear the comments
> from the aft
> decks of the nearby yachts.Some of them are really
> mean
> spirited,suggesting that bums like us should go
> picnic elswhere
> blah,blah,blah.......
> Then in a flash,Pesky sets up the stove in the
> cockpit and begins
> getting the water boiling for pasta,the marinated 40
> clove
> garlic chicken brought from home is cooked over the
> second
> burner.While this is all going on,I set up our
> folding camp chairs and
> table on the dock.Next comes the linen table
> cloth,candles,real china
> plates,Waterford goblettes and Sterling silver
> utensils.As the mouth
> watering aromas drift through the yacht basin,I
> gently crank up the
> volume on our cassette player to better hear
> Handels"The Arrival of
> The Queen of Sheba"( I love Baroque and
> pasta!).Lighting the candles
> first,I then make a deliberate show of gently
> carressing the bottle
> before uncorking with the Swiss Army knife.The
> accompanying soft"pop"
> from the cork timed to be heard in the break after
> the 26th bar.
> With much fuss,Pesky dresses up the plates with
> steaming offerings
> to our stomaches.Sitting bolt upright in our
> chairs,we both make like
> we were at the Ritz,with much clinking of fork to
> plate and tinkling
> of glasses as toasts are rendered to friends and
> heros.
> Later on,well after sunset,we slowly put it all
> away after dealing
> with an un-usual number of after supper dock
> walkers.Having been
> appraised from both near and far,the membership
> feels secure that we
> are not such bad people afterall and many of the
> walkers,having come
> to the end of the dock before turning around, wish
> us a pleasant and
> good nights sleep.
> As Pesky and I watch,the lights on the row of
> yachts gradually go
> out.All is well in Snobland.
> And this is where I have developed an awkward
> appreciation for
> little 2 stroke outboards.Yessirree......nothing
> like that
> mechanical racket and blue smoke shortly after
> midnight to stop the
> snoring and late night groping of mistresses.In due
> time,we can always
> count on at least two blabber mouths to holler
> oaths and threats from
> their sterns.This will sometimes get me to pull a
> neat little 360 as I
> holler back,"Sorry,can't hear a fu**en word you're
> sayin'!" as we
> crank her wide open and escape out onto the darkness
> of the river.
> We usually find a nice spot by one of the islands to
> spend the
> night and just about laugh ourselves to
> sleep.Nothing like having way
> too much time on your hands!!!
> Sincerely,
> Peter Lenihan.........
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>
>
> Bolger rules!!!
> - no cursing, flaming, trolling, spamming, or
> flogging dead horses
> - stay on topic, stay on thread, punctuate, no 'Ed,
> thanks, Fred' posts
> - Pls add your comments at the TOP, SIGN your posts,
> and snip away
> - Plans: Mr. Philip C. Bolger, P.O. Box 1209,
> Gloucester, MA, 01930, Fax: (978) 282-1349
> - Unsubscribe:bolger-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> - Open discussion:
>bolger_coffee_lounge-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>bolger-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
Bill--I have spent many an hour studying the plans for Old Shoe.
Any time you put a lot of capacity in a short boat, you end up using about
the same amount of material as you would in building a longer, narrower boat
of about the same capacity. Old Shoe is no exception.
As a general rule, the length of time necessary to build a boat varies
directly with the number of pieces which need to be fabricated and
assembled, As I recall, Old Shoe has a bottom, 2 sides, 2 transoms, 4
bulkheads, a 4 or 5 piece keel, two decks (and hatches), two seat tops, and
two seat sides (as well as gunwales, mast steps, rudder, tiller, and spars).
It is a fairly complicated boat, and I suspect that you could build a Micro
in about the same time it takes to build an Old Shoe. If a Micro is your
ultimate goal, I would suggest that you just build a Micro. If you want a
trial run, I would suggest that you build a simple boat such as a Brick.
For an experimental trial run (to develop building and sailing experience in
anticipation of building your heart's desire), there is no particular reason
to use anything other than lumberyard material. I agree that epoxy is a
superior product, but thirty years ago we built a lot of stitch and glue
boats with polyester resin. It worked back then and if money is really
tight, you can still use it.
Most folks who build Micros like them a lot and keep them for a long time.
If I were to build one, I would use good quality matrials, beef up some of
the lumber sizes (I think PCB's original scantlings are a little light), and
build/finish it as well and carefully as I could. You will find that
building and sailing small boats is a rewarding activity, and you probably
won't stop after just two boats!
John T
Any time you put a lot of capacity in a short boat, you end up using about
the same amount of material as you would in building a longer, narrower boat
of about the same capacity. Old Shoe is no exception.
As a general rule, the length of time necessary to build a boat varies
directly with the number of pieces which need to be fabricated and
assembled, As I recall, Old Shoe has a bottom, 2 sides, 2 transoms, 4
bulkheads, a 4 or 5 piece keel, two decks (and hatches), two seat tops, and
two seat sides (as well as gunwales, mast steps, rudder, tiller, and spars).
It is a fairly complicated boat, and I suspect that you could build a Micro
in about the same time it takes to build an Old Shoe. If a Micro is your
ultimate goal, I would suggest that you just build a Micro. If you want a
trial run, I would suggest that you build a simple boat such as a Brick.
For an experimental trial run (to develop building and sailing experience in
anticipation of building your heart's desire), there is no particular reason
to use anything other than lumberyard material. I agree that epoxy is a
superior product, but thirty years ago we built a lot of stitch and glue
boats with polyester resin. It worked back then and if money is really
tight, you can still use it.
Most folks who build Micros like them a lot and keep them for a long time.
If I were to build one, I would use good quality matrials, beef up some of
the lumber sizes (I think PCB's original scantlings are a little light), and
build/finish it as well and carefully as I could. You will find that
building and sailing small boats is a rewarding activity, and you probably
won't stop after just two boats!
John T
----- Original Message -----
From: <BllFs6@...>
To: <bolger@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 11:30 AM
Subject: [bolger] Old Shoe first, quick and dirty, then a Micro?
> Hi all
>
> What a great group! Its gonna take awhile for me to sift through all the
> messages, but I can tell there is much good info and enthusiam here!
>
> Now some (many) questions....
>
> I dont expect anybody to answer ALL of these questions...anyones input of
> even one little detail would be greatly appreciated....and a short answer
is ok
> if the details have been discussed already....for example you could
answer
> "use 3/8 plywood of type XWZ" and I'll go dig up the details in old posts
> myself...
>
> Also, given the range of questions, it might be better to change the
headers
> depending the topic answered ie RE: Old Shoe first, plywood or RE: Old
Shoe
> first, hull speed...ect ect....
>
> Really interesting in sailing/cruising now that I have discovered boats
that
> are buildable at home, don't take 2000 hrs to build, don't cost a fortune
to
> run, and are something I can actually afford in the first place.
>
> Particularly interested in the Old Shoe and Micro designs.
>
> I note that almost every Micro owner just loves them and that anything
bad
> said about them is more of "you cant have everything in one package for
free"
> type than of the "here is a serious problem" type. Can the same be said
of
> Old Shoe and its owners?
>
> If I were to build an Old Shoe and was generally happy with its sailing
> characteristics and seaworthiness, would I find that the Micro was
generally
> pretty similiar (with the added bonus of a bit faster, alot more room, a
cabin
> etc etc). I do understand trailering, cost, set up etc etc would be
> significantly different, just wondering about how they compare "sailing"
wise.
>
> Would setting up an Old Shoe be significantly easier or faster than a
Micro?
> Particularly if its often a solo operation? And how hard/easy/fast/slow
> would it be?
>
> What is the realisitic (or optimum) payload for an Old Shoe? Bolger gives
> one number yet I have ran across a few reports that make it sound like
the
> whole Walton family could be in it and not sink or capsize.
>
> I ask about optimum payload because given the design it "looks" like if
the
> thing is very lightly loaded, your water line will not run the whole
length
> of the boat and you'll suffer from the old square rule hull speed "law".
> Though if that was an actual problem I guess I could just throw in some
removeable
> ballast...What is the "actual" hull speed for Old Shoe.... a 1.0 factor,
1.5
> or ????
>
> How many Hp would it take go hull speed in Old Shoe?
>
> Is the design/layout of Old shoe such that you could put in 2 deep cycle
> batteries of say about 75 pounds each (with perhaps some additional
construction
> for securing and isolating the batteries). Anybody used electic trolling
> motors on Old Shoe? What models and what kind of performance if so (Or
perhaps
> even data on using a Micro that way and "we" can scale from there).
>
> Since I'm kinda leaning towards building an Old Shoe as a possible
prelude
> to a Micro would the following be a bad idea? Take the Old Shoe lead keel
and
> redesign it so that Old Shoe has the same draft as the Micro...then after
> taking Old Shoe around the local area for awhile, I'd get a realistic
feel for
> how "limiting" the modest draft of the Micro is or isn't.
>
> I guess you could put the same amount of weight on the keel, but making
it
> deeper/taller would lower your center of gravity some (and making the
keel a
> bit more narrow as well), or you could have a lighter keel (making it
even
> more narrow) and keep the center of gravity in about the same location.
How
> much does the standard Old shoe depend on its keel for resisting
sideways
> motion in the water vs its heeling over on its "edge"? All in all, I'd be
happy
> with the same weight but taller/deeper keel if it increased stability
and/or
> performance (particularly in light winds) even if it costs me a bit of
> performance in very high/favorable winds...or in other words I rather be
able to
> always/more often be moving rather than getting that extra half knot or
so at the
> top end speed.
>
> What is cheeking? Is that when the plywood raises up from being exposed
to
> water/weather? It obviously looks bad, but if you had one Old Shoe with a
hull
> as smooth as a babies bottom, and one that was badly cheeked, could you
even
> tell the difference perfomance wise and if so what kind of penalty speed
> wise are we really talking about? I ask this because of the following.
>
> IFFF I actually build an Old Shoe, I want to do it the really CHEAP,
FAST,
> and EASY route. My theory is to get one under my feet FAST, then learn
what I
> like and dont like about it, figure out any mods/tweaking it needs
(though
> more of operational considerations rather than mods that actually change
the
> structural integrity or performance characteristics). From there I can
either
> build a much better built (or at least prettier/longer lasting) Old Shoe
# 2
> or perhaps even move up to a Micro. Then I can build at a more relaxed
pace
> and still have Old Shoe # 1 to play with in the mean time.
>
> Here is how I would use it...always trailered. Mostly day sails, a modest
> number of 2/3 dayers, and mayybeee one week long cruise a year. Around
here the
> only groundings you are gonna have are on fine sand or muck...pretty much
> zero in the way of rocks or hard bottoms to worry about here or major
tidal
> fluctuations. Plus I can baby the hull by not beaching it....a little
wading
> won't bother me any. I can also baby the hull buy having a well
built/designed
> trailer. So, the only part of the hull thats gonna see any regular abuse
is
> the bottom of the keel. I live in Pensacola, Florida, a pretty warm and
humid
> climate, but very often sunny rather than overcast for long periods of
time
> (if that information helps). I can also baby the boat by keeping it
properly
> covered, drained, and doing paint touch ups when required (I am pretty
good at
> taking care of things that need taking care of).
>
> So given that information....what would your recommendations for a quick,
> dirty, and cheap build be? Type of plywood? Epoxy or Polyester? Just
glass/tape
> the corners? Kind of paint? Can I get away with just painting the inside
as
> well? Even if the paint fails to fully protect the plywood, could I get
3/4
> decent years of use outa el cheapo if I use it/baby it as described
above? One
> thing I might think about "splurging wise" would to be to use thicker
pieces
> of "cheap, locally available" plywood given that the price increase for
> significantly thicker plywood is often pretty modest. A heavier boat is
also
> not? a problem as it would rarely have more than two rather light adults
and
> often just little old me at 130 pounds.
>
> So, your guys input on a quick and dirty build? And a time estimate for
> construction? Cost estimate (just for hull and supplies). I've got the
tools, am
> mechanically inclined, handy with the hands, decent with wood and glues
and
> screws, and if neccessary can force my self to "just build it" rather
than
> overpondering, waffling and trying to improve some thing as designed.
>
> Looks/cheecking/ and modest performance penalties are perfectly
acceptable,
> but structural/safety considerations deserve more thought. Though I would
> almost excusively be using the boat in relatively small, warm protected
waters,
> or very close to the shore when out in the gulf proper...... so long as I
> have flotation, a wet suit top, a few flares, and perhaps some diving
fins the
> boat could break apart and sink and I'd still have a good chance of
living to
> tell the tale.
>
> Actually, I'd kind of get a kick if the thing looked like crap but was
> structually sound and performed as advertised. Even thought of name for
the
> boat....."KNOT PRETTY" :)
>
> Well, thats more than enough for now!
>
> Thanks for taking the time to read this and thanks in advance for any
input!
>
> take care
>
> Blll
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> Bolger rules!!!
> - no cursing, flaming, trolling, spamming, or flogging dead horses
> - stay on topic, stay on thread, punctuate, no 'Ed, thanks, Fred' posts
> - Pls add your comments at the TOP, SIGN your posts, and snip away
> - Plans: Mr. Philip C. Bolger, P.O. Box 1209, Gloucester, MA, 01930, Fax:
(978) 282-1349
> - Unsubscribe:bolger-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> - Open discussion:bolger_coffee_lounge-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.8/22 - Release Date: 6/17/2005
>
>
Bruce,
Every once in awhile,I get into one of those devilish states
where,for the complete lack of anything more constructive to do,I head
over to one of the more posh yacht clubs close by and feign a desire
to overnight at the guest dock.The dockmaster,more accustomed to gin
palaces,usually gives something of a smirk as he brusquely directs me
to a spot at the furthest end of the quest dock.Fortunately for
me,this puts me right behind the sterns of a row of obnoxious
yachts.Due to the odd shape and style of my boat( the mighty
Micro,LESTAT) we invariably draw a fair amount of attention and the
occassional member will deign to actually stroll over to give us a
closer look.Of course,he knows(and we too!) that his fellow members
are all looking over and listening in the quite of the evening air to
hear our exchange.After the usual round of pleasantries,with me
playing the goofy nut explaining the flat square stem etc...,he
predictably launches into some rot about proper boat
shapes.Naturally,our snot-about-the docks has the proper boat shape as
do most of his experienced fellow yachtsmen. With something like the
look you would expect from some elder statesman annunciating on the
pityful state of national health care,he offers the suggestion that I
too should"get with it,Lad!". That's just about the time where my
Pesky Crew pops her head up out the companionway hatch,and kindly
enquires of me whether we should be having the'97 Chateau de Rochforte
or perhaps the Beaujolais Nouveau with supper tonight.Our SAD
(snot-about-the-docks) smiles politely and reminds us that the club
has its own rather impressive selection and that bringing your own
bottle to the dining room is...er..ah...well not exactly permitted.Oh
shucking away,I tell him that we won't be using the dining room but
will instead eat on the boat.With arched eyebrows and barely contained
amusement,SAD wonders out loud about the wisdom of mixing sandwiches
and wine but gives a friendly chuckle and waddles down the dock
mumbling something about long ago college stunts. In the
background,Pesky and I can clearly hear the comments from the aft
decks of the nearby yachts.Some of them are really mean
spirited,suggesting that bums like us should go picnic elswhere
blah,blah,blah.......
Then in a flash,Pesky sets up the stove in the cockpit and begins
getting the water boiling for pasta,the marinated 40 clove
garlic chicken brought from home is cooked over the second
burner.While this is all going on,I set up our folding camp chairs and
table on the dock.Next comes the linen table cloth,candles,real china
plates,Waterford goblettes and Sterling silver utensils.As the mouth
watering aromas drift through the yacht basin,I gently crank up the
volume on our cassette player to better hear Handels"The Arrival of
The Queen of Sheba"( I love Baroque and pasta!).Lighting the candles
first,I then make a deliberate show of gently carressing the bottle
before uncorking with the Swiss Army knife.The accompanying soft"pop"
from the cork timed to be heard in the break after the 26th bar.
With much fuss,Pesky dresses up the plates with steaming offerings
to our stomaches.Sitting bolt upright in our chairs,we both make like
we were at the Ritz,with much clinking of fork to plate and tinkling
of glasses as toasts are rendered to friends and heros.
Later on,well after sunset,we slowly put it all away after dealing
with an un-usual number of after supper dock walkers.Having been
appraised from both near and far,the membership feels secure that we
are not such bad people afterall and many of the walkers,having come
to the end of the dock before turning around, wish us a pleasant and
good nights sleep.
As Pesky and I watch,the lights on the row of yachts gradually go
out.All is well in Snobland.
And this is where I have developed an awkward appreciation for
little 2 stroke outboards.Yessirree......nothing like that
mechanical racket and blue smoke shortly after midnight to stop the
snoring and late night groping of mistresses.In due time,we can always
count on at least two blabber mouths to holler oaths and threats from
their sterns.This will sometimes get me to pull a neat little 360 as I
holler back,"Sorry,can't hear a fu**en word you're sayin'!" as we
crank her wide open and escape out onto the darkness of the river.
We usually find a nice spot by one of the islands to spend the
night and just about laugh ourselves to sleep.Nothing like having way
too much time on your hands!!!
Sincerely,
Peter Lenihan.........
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Every once in awhile,I get into one of those devilish states
where,for the complete lack of anything more constructive to do,I head
over to one of the more posh yacht clubs close by and feign a desire
to overnight at the guest dock.The dockmaster,more accustomed to gin
palaces,usually gives something of a smirk as he brusquely directs me
to a spot at the furthest end of the quest dock.Fortunately for
me,this puts me right behind the sterns of a row of obnoxious
yachts.Due to the odd shape and style of my boat( the mighty
Micro,LESTAT) we invariably draw a fair amount of attention and the
occassional member will deign to actually stroll over to give us a
closer look.Of course,he knows(and we too!) that his fellow members
are all looking over and listening in the quite of the evening air to
hear our exchange.After the usual round of pleasantries,with me
playing the goofy nut explaining the flat square stem etc...,he
predictably launches into some rot about proper boat
shapes.Naturally,our snot-about-the docks has the proper boat shape as
do most of his experienced fellow yachtsmen. With something like the
look you would expect from some elder statesman annunciating on the
pityful state of national health care,he offers the suggestion that I
too should"get with it,Lad!". That's just about the time where my
Pesky Crew pops her head up out the companionway hatch,and kindly
enquires of me whether we should be having the'97 Chateau de Rochforte
or perhaps the Beaujolais Nouveau with supper tonight.Our SAD
(snot-about-the-docks) smiles politely and reminds us that the club
has its own rather impressive selection and that bringing your own
bottle to the dining room is...er..ah...well not exactly permitted.Oh
shucking away,I tell him that we won't be using the dining room but
will instead eat on the boat.With arched eyebrows and barely contained
amusement,SAD wonders out loud about the wisdom of mixing sandwiches
and wine but gives a friendly chuckle and waddles down the dock
mumbling something about long ago college stunts. In the
background,Pesky and I can clearly hear the comments from the aft
decks of the nearby yachts.Some of them are really mean
spirited,suggesting that bums like us should go picnic elswhere
blah,blah,blah.......
Then in a flash,Pesky sets up the stove in the cockpit and begins
getting the water boiling for pasta,the marinated 40 clove
garlic chicken brought from home is cooked over the second
burner.While this is all going on,I set up our folding camp chairs and
table on the dock.Next comes the linen table cloth,candles,real china
plates,Waterford goblettes and Sterling silver utensils.As the mouth
watering aromas drift through the yacht basin,I gently crank up the
volume on our cassette player to better hear Handels"The Arrival of
The Queen of Sheba"( I love Baroque and pasta!).Lighting the candles
first,I then make a deliberate show of gently carressing the bottle
before uncorking with the Swiss Army knife.The accompanying soft"pop"
from the cork timed to be heard in the break after the 26th bar.
With much fuss,Pesky dresses up the plates with steaming offerings
to our stomaches.Sitting bolt upright in our chairs,we both make like
we were at the Ritz,with much clinking of fork to plate and tinkling
of glasses as toasts are rendered to friends and heros.
Later on,well after sunset,we slowly put it all away after dealing
with an un-usual number of after supper dock walkers.Having been
appraised from both near and far,the membership feels secure that we
are not such bad people afterall and many of the walkers,having come
to the end of the dock before turning around, wish us a pleasant and
good nights sleep.
As Pesky and I watch,the lights on the row of yachts gradually go
out.All is well in Snobland.
And this is where I have developed an awkward appreciation for
little 2 stroke outboards.Yessirree......nothing like that
mechanical racket and blue smoke shortly after midnight to stop the
snoring and late night groping of mistresses.In due time,we can always
count on at least two blabber mouths to holler oaths and threats from
their sterns.This will sometimes get me to pull a neat little 360 as I
holler back,"Sorry,can't hear a fu**en word you're sayin'!" as we
crank her wide open and escape out onto the darkness of the river.
We usually find a nice spot by one of the islands to spend the
night and just about laugh ourselves to sleep.Nothing like having way
too much time on your hands!!!
Sincerely,
Peter Lenihan.........
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I'd suggest building it as designed and lashing a stick of the required
length to the transom to keep a check on water depth.
Howard
length to the transom to keep a check on water depth.
Howard
--- Inbolger@yahoogroups.com, BllFs6@a... wrote:
> Since I'm kinda leaning towards building an Old Shoe as a possible
prelude
> to a Micro would the following be a bad idea? Take the Old Shoe lead
keel and
> redesign it so that Old Shoe has the same draft as the Micro...then
after
> taking Old Shoe around the local area for awhile, I'd get a
realistic feel for
> how "limiting" the modest draft of the Micro is or isn't.
It strikes me that a lot of these layouts suffer from the fault of
requiring one of the occupants of the double berth to clamber over the
other one when having to get up in the middle of the night to check the
anchor or the dog or whatever...
Howard
--- Inbolger@yahoogroups.com, "John Bell" <smallboatdesigner@m...>
wrote:
requiring one of the occupants of the double berth to clamber over the
other one when having to get up in the middle of the night to check the
anchor or the dog or whatever...
Howard
--- Inbolger@yahoogroups.com, "John Bell" <smallboatdesigner@m...>
wrote:
> I never realized it until now, but the SuperBrick *is* almostidentical in
> size and layout to my Coleman pop-up camper! Camping in mine lastweekend I
> was thinking what a great layout this would be for a boat.
there maybe other issues, just not sure that the flat bow is the
best way. Seems that it is really a scow and wonder if a garvey
front end might improve performance. Imagine you are on the
waterway saling along and here comes one of those barges being
pushed by a tug and that incredible wake would just stop like
hitting a tree in a VW.
I can't tell from the book but what is cabin hieght.?
--- Inbolger@yahoogroups.com, "John Bell" <smallboatdesigner@m...>
wrote:
best way. Seems that it is really a scow and wonder if a garvey
front end might improve performance. Imagine you are on the
waterway saling along and here comes one of those barges being
pushed by a tug and that incredible wake would just stop like
hitting a tree in a VW.
I can't tell from the book but what is cabin hieght.?
--- Inbolger@yahoogroups.com, "John Bell" <smallboatdesigner@m...>
wrote:
> I never realized it until now, but the SuperBrick *is* almostidentical in
> size and layout to my Coleman pop-up camper! Camping in mine lastweekend I
> was thinking what a great layout this would be for a boat. And Iwas right!
> ----- Original Message -----Micro?
> From: "mark" <planzman@y...>
> To: <bolger@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 2:20 PM
> Subject: [bolger] Re: Old Shoe first, quick and dirty, then a
>boat
>
> | Have you looked at a super brick? IT is fantastic and may be the
> | third boat that I build. I am planning to start a small pontoon
> | this weekend to use on a nearby (less than 1/2 mile travel) forboat,
> | fishing and evening cruises. Then I might build a non Bolger
> | the Great Pelican to learn sailing with. This boat should gotogether
> | fast and give me something to put in the water whild I ambuilding the
> | SB. I am amazed with the SB concept and wonder how she sails.She is
> | something like a Coleman pup up camper with out the pop up. Iwould
> | like to take her to the gulf island and park her in thecampground (in
> | the water and safely anchored) and use the pelican as anexplorer and
> | the SB sorta has home base, a place to clean up, sleep, cookwhatever.
> |horses
> | well this is my plan, whats yours?
> |
> | mark
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | Bolger rules!!!
> | - no cursing, flaming, trolling, spamming, or flogging dead
> | - stay on topic, stay on thread, punctuate, no 'Ed, thanks,Fred' posts
> | - Pls add your comments at the TOP, SIGN your posts, and snipaway
> | - Plans: Mr. Philip C. Bolger, P.O. Box 1209, Gloucester, MA,01930, Fax:
> (978) 282-1349
> | - Unsubscribe:bolger-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> | - Open discussion:bolger_coffee_lounge-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> | Yahoo! Groups Links
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
I never realized it until now, but the SuperBrick *is* almost identical in
size and layout to my Coleman pop-up camper! Camping in mine last weekend I
was thinking what a great layout this would be for a boat. And I was right!
size and layout to my Coleman pop-up camper! Camping in mine last weekend I
was thinking what a great layout this would be for a boat. And I was right!
----- Original Message -----
From: "mark" <planzman@...>
To: <bolger@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 2:20 PM
Subject: [bolger] Re: Old Shoe first, quick and dirty, then a Micro?
| Have you looked at a super brick? IT is fantastic and may be the
| third boat that I build. I am planning to start a small pontoon boat
| this weekend to use on a nearby (less than 1/2 mile travel) for
| fishing and evening cruises. Then I might build a non Bolger boat,
| the Great Pelican to learn sailing with. This boat should go together
| fast and give me something to put in the water whild I am building the
| SB. I am amazed with the SB concept and wonder how she sails. She is
| something like a Coleman pup up camper with out the pop up. I would
| like to take her to the gulf island and park her in the campground (in
| the water and safely anchored) and use the pelican as an explorer and
| the SB sorta has home base, a place to clean up, sleep, cook whatever.
|
| well this is my plan, whats yours?
|
| mark
|
|
|
|
|
| Bolger rules!!!
| - no cursing, flaming, trolling, spamming, or flogging dead horses
| - stay on topic, stay on thread, punctuate, no 'Ed, thanks, Fred' posts
| - Pls add your comments at the TOP, SIGN your posts, and snip away
| - Plans: Mr. Philip C. Bolger, P.O. Box 1209, Gloucester, MA, 01930, Fax:
(978) 282-1349
| - Unsubscribe:bolger-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
| - Open discussion:bolger_coffee_lounge-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
| Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have you looked at a super brick? IT is fantastic and may be the
third boat that I build. I am planning to start a small pontoon boat
this weekend to use on a nearby (less than 1/2 mile travel) for
fishing and evening cruises. Then I might build a non Bolger boat,
the Great Pelican to learn sailing with. This boat should go together
fast and give me something to put in the water whild I am building the
SB. I am amazed with the SB concept and wonder how she sails. She is
something like a Coleman pup up camper with out the pop up. I would
like to take her to the gulf island and park her in the campground (in
the water and safely anchored) and use the pelican as an explorer and
the SB sorta has home base, a place to clean up, sleep, cook whatever.
well this is my plan, whats yours?
mark
third boat that I build. I am planning to start a small pontoon boat
this weekend to use on a nearby (less than 1/2 mile travel) for
fishing and evening cruises. Then I might build a non Bolger boat,
the Great Pelican to learn sailing with. This boat should go together
fast and give me something to put in the water whild I am building the
SB. I am amazed with the SB concept and wonder how she sails. She is
something like a Coleman pup up camper with out the pop up. I would
like to take her to the gulf island and park her in the campground (in
the water and safely anchored) and use the pelican as an explorer and
the SB sorta has home base, a place to clean up, sleep, cook whatever.
well this is my plan, whats yours?
mark
An Oldshoe would make a great daysailer!
I think quick and dirty is the only way to build a
short lived boat with no resale value.
That means, Home Depot plywood, housepaint
and polytarp sails. The trailer would be your
biggest expense. You could use an electric
trolling motor, but oars would work fine and be
cheaper.
I would use epoxy for the glue at the
chines, just because it works best.
Certainly you could skip the fiberglass sheathing,
and perhaps even the fiberglass tape at the
chines, [though adding that might we worthwhile.]
If you can avoid too much head scratching time,
I bet an Oldshoe could be build in a few weekends
or less.
Calculating the hull speed of an Oldshoe misses
the point. Instead, just build one and measure the
hull speed if you really need to know.
I plugged Oldshoe into Hulls.exe
and here is a plot of the 1,000 lbs
waterline. The Walton's are pretty skinny
and they certainly weigh less that 1,000 lbs.
http://hallman.org/bolger/OldShoeWaterline.gif
I think quick and dirty is the only way to build a
short lived boat with no resale value.
That means, Home Depot plywood, housepaint
and polytarp sails. The trailer would be your
biggest expense. You could use an electric
trolling motor, but oars would work fine and be
cheaper.
I would use epoxy for the glue at the
chines, just because it works best.
Certainly you could skip the fiberglass sheathing,
and perhaps even the fiberglass tape at the
chines, [though adding that might we worthwhile.]
If you can avoid too much head scratching time,
I bet an Oldshoe could be build in a few weekends
or less.
Calculating the hull speed of an Oldshoe misses
the point. Instead, just build one and measure the
hull speed if you really need to know.
I plugged Oldshoe into Hulls.exe
and here is a plot of the 1,000 lbs
waterline. The Walton's are pretty skinny
and they certainly weigh less that 1,000 lbs.
http://hallman.org/bolger/OldShoeWaterline.gif
Hi all
What a great group! Its gonna take awhile for me to sift through all the
messages, but I can tell there is much good info and enthusiam here!
Now some (many) questions....
I dont expect anybody to answer ALL of these questions...anyones input of
even one little detail would be greatly appreciated....and a short answer is ok
if the details have been discussed already....for example you could answer
"use 3/8 plywood of type XWZ" and I'll go dig up the details in old posts
myself...
Also, given the range of questions, it might be better to change the headers
depending the topic answered ie RE: Old Shoe first, plywood or RE: Old Shoe
first, hull speed...ect ect....
Really interesting in sailing/cruising now that I have discovered boats that
are buildable at home, don't take 2000 hrs to build, don't cost a fortune to
run, and are something I can actually afford in the first place.
Particularly interested in the Old Shoe and Micro designs.
I note that almost every Micro owner just loves them and that anything bad
said about them is more of "you cant have everything in one package for free"
type than of the "here is a serious problem" type. Can the same be said of
Old Shoe and its owners?
If I were to build an Old Shoe and was generally happy with its sailing
characteristics and seaworthiness, would I find that the Micro was generally
pretty similiar (with the added bonus of a bit faster, alot more room, a cabin
etc etc). I do understand trailering, cost, set up etc etc would be
significantly different, just wondering about how they compare "sailing" wise.
Would setting up an Old Shoe be significantly easier or faster than a Micro?
Particularly if its often a solo operation? And how hard/easy/fast/slow
would it be?
What is the realisitic (or optimum) payload for an Old Shoe? Bolger gives
one number yet I have ran across a few reports that make it sound like the
whole Walton family could be in it and not sink or capsize.
I ask about optimum payload because given the design it "looks" like if the
thing is very lightly loaded, your water line will not run the whole length
of the boat and you'll suffer from the old square rule hull speed "law".
Though if that was an actual problem I guess I could just throw in some removeable
ballast...What is the "actual" hull speed for Old Shoe.... a 1.0 factor, 1.5
or ????
How many Hp would it take go hull speed in Old Shoe?
Is the design/layout of Old shoe such that you could put in 2 deep cycle
batteries of say about 75 pounds each (with perhaps some additional construction
for securing and isolating the batteries). Anybody used electic trolling
motors on Old Shoe? What models and what kind of performance if so (Or perhaps
even data on using a Micro that way and "we" can scale from there).
Since I'm kinda leaning towards building an Old Shoe as a possible prelude
to a Micro would the following be a bad idea? Take the Old Shoe lead keel and
redesign it so that Old Shoe has the same draft as the Micro...then after
taking Old Shoe around the local area for awhile, I'd get a realistic feel for
how "limiting" the modest draft of the Micro is or isn't.
I guess you could put the same amount of weight on the keel, but making it
deeper/taller would lower your center of gravity some (and making the keel a
bit more narrow as well), or you could have a lighter keel (making it even
more narrow) and keep the center of gravity in about the same location. How
much does the standard Old shoe depend on its keel for resisting sideways
motion in the water vs its heeling over on its "edge"? All in all, I'd be happy
with the same weight but taller/deeper keel if it increased stability and/or
performance (particularly in light winds) even if it costs me a bit of
performance in very high/favorable winds...or in other words I rather be able to
always/more often be moving rather than getting that extra half knot or so at the
top end speed.
What is cheeking? Is that when the plywood raises up from being exposed to
water/weather? It obviously looks bad, but if you had one Old Shoe with a hull
as smooth as a babies bottom, and one that was badly cheeked, could you even
tell the difference perfomance wise and if so what kind of penalty speed
wise are we really talking about? I ask this because of the following.
IFFF I actually build an Old Shoe, I want to do it the really CHEAP, FAST,
and EASY route. My theory is to get one under my feet FAST, then learn what I
like and dont like about it, figure out any mods/tweaking it needs (though
more of operational considerations rather than mods that actually change the
structural integrity or performance characteristics). From there I can either
build a much better built (or at least prettier/longer lasting) Old Shoe # 2
or perhaps even move up to a Micro. Then I can build at a more relaxed pace
and still have Old Shoe # 1 to play with in the mean time.
Here is how I would use it...always trailered. Mostly day sails, a modest
number of 2/3 dayers, and mayybeee one week long cruise a year. Around here the
only groundings you are gonna have are on fine sand or muck...pretty much
zero in the way of rocks or hard bottoms to worry about here or major tidal
fluctuations. Plus I can baby the hull by not beaching it....a little wading
won't bother me any. I can also baby the hull buy having a well built/designed
trailer. So, the only part of the hull thats gonna see any regular abuse is
the bottom of the keel. I live in Pensacola, Florida, a pretty warm and humid
climate, but very often sunny rather than overcast for long periods of time
(if that information helps). I can also baby the boat by keeping it properly
covered, drained, and doing paint touch ups when required (I am pretty good at
taking care of things that need taking care of).
So given that information....what would your recommendations for a quick,
dirty, and cheap build be? Type of plywood? Epoxy or Polyester? Just glass/tape
the corners? Kind of paint? Can I get away with just painting the inside as
well? Even if the paint fails to fully protect the plywood, could I get 3/4
decent years of use outa el cheapo if I use it/baby it as described above? One
thing I might think about "splurging wise" would to be to use thicker pieces
of "cheap, locally available" plywood given that the price increase for
significantly thicker plywood is often pretty modest. A heavier boat is also
not? a problem as it would rarely have more than two rather light adults and
often just little old me at 130 pounds.
So, your guys input on a quick and dirty build? And a time estimate for
construction? Cost estimate (just for hull and supplies). I've got the tools, am
mechanically inclined, handy with the hands, decent with wood and glues and
screws, and if neccessary can force my self to "just build it" rather than
overpondering, waffling and trying to improve some thing as designed.
Looks/cheecking/ and modest performance penalties are perfectly acceptable,
but structural/safety considerations deserve more thought. Though I would
almost excusively be using the boat in relatively small, warm protected waters,
or very close to the shore when out in the gulf proper...... so long as I
have flotation, a wet suit top, a few flares, and perhaps some diving fins the
boat could break apart and sink and I'd still have a good chance of living to
tell the tale.
Actually, I'd kind of get a kick if the thing looked like crap but was
structually sound and performed as advertised. Even thought of name for the
boat....."KNOT PRETTY" :)
Well, thats more than enough for now!
Thanks for taking the time to read this and thanks in advance for any input!
take care
Blll
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
What a great group! Its gonna take awhile for me to sift through all the
messages, but I can tell there is much good info and enthusiam here!
Now some (many) questions....
I dont expect anybody to answer ALL of these questions...anyones input of
even one little detail would be greatly appreciated....and a short answer is ok
if the details have been discussed already....for example you could answer
"use 3/8 plywood of type XWZ" and I'll go dig up the details in old posts
myself...
Also, given the range of questions, it might be better to change the headers
depending the topic answered ie RE: Old Shoe first, plywood or RE: Old Shoe
first, hull speed...ect ect....
Really interesting in sailing/cruising now that I have discovered boats that
are buildable at home, don't take 2000 hrs to build, don't cost a fortune to
run, and are something I can actually afford in the first place.
Particularly interested in the Old Shoe and Micro designs.
I note that almost every Micro owner just loves them and that anything bad
said about them is more of "you cant have everything in one package for free"
type than of the "here is a serious problem" type. Can the same be said of
Old Shoe and its owners?
If I were to build an Old Shoe and was generally happy with its sailing
characteristics and seaworthiness, would I find that the Micro was generally
pretty similiar (with the added bonus of a bit faster, alot more room, a cabin
etc etc). I do understand trailering, cost, set up etc etc would be
significantly different, just wondering about how they compare "sailing" wise.
Would setting up an Old Shoe be significantly easier or faster than a Micro?
Particularly if its often a solo operation? And how hard/easy/fast/slow
would it be?
What is the realisitic (or optimum) payload for an Old Shoe? Bolger gives
one number yet I have ran across a few reports that make it sound like the
whole Walton family could be in it and not sink or capsize.
I ask about optimum payload because given the design it "looks" like if the
thing is very lightly loaded, your water line will not run the whole length
of the boat and you'll suffer from the old square rule hull speed "law".
Though if that was an actual problem I guess I could just throw in some removeable
ballast...What is the "actual" hull speed for Old Shoe.... a 1.0 factor, 1.5
or ????
How many Hp would it take go hull speed in Old Shoe?
Is the design/layout of Old shoe such that you could put in 2 deep cycle
batteries of say about 75 pounds each (with perhaps some additional construction
for securing and isolating the batteries). Anybody used electic trolling
motors on Old Shoe? What models and what kind of performance if so (Or perhaps
even data on using a Micro that way and "we" can scale from there).
Since I'm kinda leaning towards building an Old Shoe as a possible prelude
to a Micro would the following be a bad idea? Take the Old Shoe lead keel and
redesign it so that Old Shoe has the same draft as the Micro...then after
taking Old Shoe around the local area for awhile, I'd get a realistic feel for
how "limiting" the modest draft of the Micro is or isn't.
I guess you could put the same amount of weight on the keel, but making it
deeper/taller would lower your center of gravity some (and making the keel a
bit more narrow as well), or you could have a lighter keel (making it even
more narrow) and keep the center of gravity in about the same location. How
much does the standard Old shoe depend on its keel for resisting sideways
motion in the water vs its heeling over on its "edge"? All in all, I'd be happy
with the same weight but taller/deeper keel if it increased stability and/or
performance (particularly in light winds) even if it costs me a bit of
performance in very high/favorable winds...or in other words I rather be able to
always/more often be moving rather than getting that extra half knot or so at the
top end speed.
What is cheeking? Is that when the plywood raises up from being exposed to
water/weather? It obviously looks bad, but if you had one Old Shoe with a hull
as smooth as a babies bottom, and one that was badly cheeked, could you even
tell the difference perfomance wise and if so what kind of penalty speed
wise are we really talking about? I ask this because of the following.
IFFF I actually build an Old Shoe, I want to do it the really CHEAP, FAST,
and EASY route. My theory is to get one under my feet FAST, then learn what I
like and dont like about it, figure out any mods/tweaking it needs (though
more of operational considerations rather than mods that actually change the
structural integrity or performance characteristics). From there I can either
build a much better built (or at least prettier/longer lasting) Old Shoe # 2
or perhaps even move up to a Micro. Then I can build at a more relaxed pace
and still have Old Shoe # 1 to play with in the mean time.
Here is how I would use it...always trailered. Mostly day sails, a modest
number of 2/3 dayers, and mayybeee one week long cruise a year. Around here the
only groundings you are gonna have are on fine sand or muck...pretty much
zero in the way of rocks or hard bottoms to worry about here or major tidal
fluctuations. Plus I can baby the hull by not beaching it....a little wading
won't bother me any. I can also baby the hull buy having a well built/designed
trailer. So, the only part of the hull thats gonna see any regular abuse is
the bottom of the keel. I live in Pensacola, Florida, a pretty warm and humid
climate, but very often sunny rather than overcast for long periods of time
(if that information helps). I can also baby the boat by keeping it properly
covered, drained, and doing paint touch ups when required (I am pretty good at
taking care of things that need taking care of).
So given that information....what would your recommendations for a quick,
dirty, and cheap build be? Type of plywood? Epoxy or Polyester? Just glass/tape
the corners? Kind of paint? Can I get away with just painting the inside as
well? Even if the paint fails to fully protect the plywood, could I get 3/4
decent years of use outa el cheapo if I use it/baby it as described above? One
thing I might think about "splurging wise" would to be to use thicker pieces
of "cheap, locally available" plywood given that the price increase for
significantly thicker plywood is often pretty modest. A heavier boat is also
not? a problem as it would rarely have more than two rather light adults and
often just little old me at 130 pounds.
So, your guys input on a quick and dirty build? And a time estimate for
construction? Cost estimate (just for hull and supplies). I've got the tools, am
mechanically inclined, handy with the hands, decent with wood and glues and
screws, and if neccessary can force my self to "just build it" rather than
overpondering, waffling and trying to improve some thing as designed.
Looks/cheecking/ and modest performance penalties are perfectly acceptable,
but structural/safety considerations deserve more thought. Though I would
almost excusively be using the boat in relatively small, warm protected waters,
or very close to the shore when out in the gulf proper...... so long as I
have flotation, a wet suit top, a few flares, and perhaps some diving fins the
boat could break apart and sink and I'd still have a good chance of living to
tell the tale.
Actually, I'd kind of get a kick if the thing looked like crap but was
structually sound and performed as advertised. Even thought of name for the
boat....."KNOT PRETTY" :)
Well, thats more than enough for now!
Thanks for taking the time to read this and thanks in advance for any input!
take care
Blll
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]