Re: Lenihan royalties......
--- Inbolger@yahoogroups.com, "sctree" <sctree@y...> wrote:
Gee Rick,thanks!
Here is a link to the joint in question,just scroll down a bit
to "hollow":
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bolger/files/How%20To/
it has the rather pedestrian appellation of "HOLLOW JOINT" but I can
easily see myself becoming rather attached to your choice naming of
it :-)
Seeing as it was a method passed on to me freely many many years
ago,it would be terribly treacherous of me to presume or assume
royalities due.
Mind you,a well bundled and padded bottle of Port arriving in my mail
box would certainly be a treat,whatever the occassion :-D
I'm pleased you recalled this method and trust your new beam will
serve admirably its function,without failure,for many years to come.
If you didn't live so far away,I'd be inviting you over to my boat
shop where we could both decant some nice Port while I give you the
royal tour of Windermere...which may take some time as we would also
have to down a number of stinky cheeses and a bagette or
two.....rough life up here,I tell ya!
So.....tell us about your beam....how big and for which boat :-)
All the best!
Sincerely,
Peter Lenihan,aka "hollow man",resting heavily on my posterior while
a few pounds of excellent supper and a few goblets of wine become
better acquainted in the grand ballroom of my lower gut,from along
the dark shores of the raging St.Lawrence........
>
> Got me thinking what I could do to insure it was well constructed.
> The mental light bulb went on when I recalled the "Lenihan Never
Fail
> Ultimate Epoxy Squeeze Hollow Join Method" (or whatever it's
called).
> You may remember reading the occasional rants proclaiming the value
> of this epoxy technique.. Dish out one surface with a grinder
> allowing for a pocket of epoxy which becomes captive (as opposed to
> squeezing out) as the parts are clamped together. Well I used it...
> Worked great. Only trouble is I failed to ask permission from the
> patent owner... I can only imagine the penalties that I'll have to
> add to whatever the usual tribute payments are for the use of this
> method...
>
> Rick
> Resting easy looking at my now guaranteed strong crossbeam, yet at
> the
> same time a bit uneasy considering the to few bottles of port
> remaining
> in the wine locker my be insufficient for a royalty payment.
>
Built a crossbeam today. It had to be strong.
Got me thinking what I could do to insure it was well constructed.
The mental light bulb went on when I recalled the "Lenihan Never Fail
Ultimate Epoxy Squeeze Hollow Join Method" (or whatever it's called).
You may remember reading the occasional rants proclaiming the value
of this epoxy technique.. Dish out one surface with a grinder
allowing for a pocket of epoxy which becomes captive (as opposed to
squeezing out) as the parts are clamped together. Well I used it...
Worked great. Only trouble is I failed to ask permission from the
patent owner... I can only imagine the penalties that I'll have to
add to whatever the usual tribute payments are for the use of this
method...
Rick
Resting easy looking at my now guaranteed strong crossbeam, yet at
the
same time a bit uneasy considering the to few bottles of port
remaining
in the wine locker my be insufficient for a royalty payment.
Got me thinking what I could do to insure it was well constructed.
The mental light bulb went on when I recalled the "Lenihan Never Fail
Ultimate Epoxy Squeeze Hollow Join Method" (or whatever it's called).
You may remember reading the occasional rants proclaiming the value
of this epoxy technique.. Dish out one surface with a grinder
allowing for a pocket of epoxy which becomes captive (as opposed to
squeezing out) as the parts are clamped together. Well I used it...
Worked great. Only trouble is I failed to ask permission from the
patent owner... I can only imagine the penalties that I'll have to
add to whatever the usual tribute payments are for the use of this
method...
Rick
Resting easy looking at my now guaranteed strong crossbeam, yet at
the
same time a bit uneasy considering the to few bottles of port
remaining
in the wine locker my be insufficient for a royalty payment.