Re: [bolger] Re: Brick motor

>From: "Lincoln Ross" <lincolnr@...>

>I wonder if you made a Brick really sturdy and attached the motor on
>the side if you could get it to plane while going sideways?


No but I bet you could get it to roll :)

Micheal Surface still building
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail athttp://www.hotmail.com
--- Inbolger@egroups.com, "Richard Spelling" <richard@s...> wrote:
> > ballast to the other end. (thus increasing moment of inertia so it
> > will pitch up and down much more when hitting waves). You will
also
> Actualy, it would pitch up and down less... so waves will come over
the top
> more...
>
Well, it would pitch more when you didn't want it to, and less when
you did. I'd expect that the great increase in moment of inertia
without a corresponding increase in damping would result in more
pitch
oscillations, but decreased immediate response to a wave. However, I
think the Brick's ends are so buoyant that this latter problem
wouldn't be all that significant. A nasty scenario in any case,
particularly if you have motorboats providing unidirectional waves at
a fixed frequency. There would probably be one particular motorboat
in
the area that would turn the boat into a hobbyhorse with its wake.

I don't understand how it works, but yesterday we saw wakes
with breaking waves in the middle of the lake, no boats nearby.
> ballast to the other end. (thus increasing moment of inertia so it
> will pitch up and down much more when hitting waves). You will also
Actualy, it would pitch up and down less... so waves will come over the top
more...

> I wonder if you made a Brick really sturdy and attached the motor on
> the side if you could get it to plane while going sideways?
Hey, now that's an idea! I bet it would work pretty good too, with the minor
exception of an unfortunate tendency to destroy itself when the forward side
(?) slamed into a nice big wave...