Lexan Rejuvenation
Estimado Grupo Bolger,
If you're wondering how to bring tired Lexan back to life, try Mirror
Glaze; first using the clear plastic cleaner and then the clear plastic
polish. Auto parts stores sell this product.
Bill Jochems
-----Original Message-----
From: david <galvind@...>
To:bolger@egroups.com<bolger@egroups.com>
Date: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 6:06 AM
Subject: [bolger] apologia
If you're wondering how to bring tired Lexan back to life, try Mirror
Glaze; first using the clear plastic cleaner and then the clear plastic
polish. Auto parts stores sell this product.
Bill Jochems
-----Original Message-----
From: david <galvind@...>
To:bolger@egroups.com<bolger@egroups.com>
Date: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 6:06 AM
Subject: [bolger] apologia
>To the List:
>
>It was I who inadvertantly sent the message below to the list last
>week. I did not intend it as a flame. It was meant as a private
>correspondence and as humor (admittedly pretty weak). When I
>realized my error I was deeply embarrassed. I was also shamed
>by the fact that I had posted a big attachment that would cause
>some members problems when they tried to download the thing.
>In the brave and noble spirit of one who regularly plants his
>virtual foot in his virtual mouth, I unsubscribed and hid under a
>rock until today. I did not anticipate that my error would inspire
>such an emotionally heated exchange within the list, and I
>regret my part in stimulating such an exchange.
>
>In my own defense, I would like to point out that I posted a single
>page from a magazine to which I have subscribed for something
>like five years. I did not "pilfer" anything. As I expressed to one
>list member privately, seeing what is available in MAIB might
>attract new subscribers. Also, the cartoon shown is for an
>uncompleted plan which, I suspect, the designer presented in the
>hope that a reader would express an interest in commissioning.
>It not a construction plan and only barely a study plan. It is
>another of Bolger's facinating ideas, that, without a sponsor, will
>go no further. Finally, as such a trifling bit both of the magazine
>and Bolger's body of work, the posting qualifies as "fair use", imho.
>
>I am not in the business of violating anyone's intellectual property
>rights, least of all Bolger's; indeed, I am certain that I have not,
>either legally, ethically or even metaphysically. Whatever opinion
>the reader holds concerning this is his (or her) own, of course. I
>begrudge no one the right to an opinion. However, shrill and
>strident posturing on either side of this argument helps no one: not
>Bolger, not MAIB, and certainly not us poor slobs who just want
>to build boats. Perhaps, as has been suggested, we should once
>again turn our focus to sawdust and goop and dreams... As for me,
>I'm going to crawl back under my rock for a while,
>
>Apologies,
>
>david galvin
>
>
>--- Inbolger@egroups.com, david <galvind@w...> wrote:
>> Michael,
>> Here you go. Don't tell the copyright cops on the list. Just pretend
>
>>I flew out
>> from NY and showed it to you in my magazine....
>
>>[attachment]
>
>
>
>
>
>Bolger rules!!!
>- no cursing
>- stay on topic
>- use punctuation
>- add your comments at the TOP and SIGN your posts
>- add some content: send "thanks!" and "ditto!" posts off-list.
>
>