Re: [bolger] Re: #635 Col. H.G. Hasler model and more ruminations

>
>
>
> Bud,
>
> no, I can't because we never did this conversion.  In light of my references to adding ballast, empty weight might be the same - give or take.  But that needs deeper examination, not doable at the moment on this end.
>                 Susanne
>

----- Original Message -----

From:bud e

To:bolger@yahoogroups.com

Sent:Wednesday, July 21, 2010 8:35 PM

Subject:Re: [bolger] Re: #635 Col. H.G. Hasler model and more ruminations

 

Hello Susanne, Can you tell me what the empty weight of ply built Col. H.G. Hasler with no anchor, anchor chain and gear on board is? Thanks for your help. Bud   --- OnWed, 7/21/10, Walter<walter@oldwharf. com>wrote: From: Walter <walter@oldwharf. com> Subject: [bolger] Re: #635 Col. H.G. Hasler model and more ruminations To: bolger@yahoogroups. com Date: Wednesday, July 21, 2010, 8:24 PM --- Inbolger@yahoogroups. com, "Susanne@... " <philbolger@. ..> wrote: > > Hello Walter, > it is too hazy today to see you across Massachusetts Bay... > > Specs for #635 are: > 20' length, 8' beam, 2' draft, 313 feet of sail on tabernacled masts, 6350lbs displacement at DWL i.e. with load. > > Susanne Altenburger, PB&F >   ----- Original Message ----- >   From: Walter >   To:bolger@yahoogroups. com >   Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 8:53 AM >   Subject: [bolger] Re: #635 Col. H.G. Hasler model and more ruminations > > >      > > >   --- Inbolger@yahoogroups. com, "Susanne@" <philbolger@> wrote: >   > >   > In response to Prairiedog's input in June on the topic and his comparison with MICRO (Navigator), I should add that the boxkeel configuration should offer more speed due to that stretched-out displacement. It most certainly should carry more supplies for long cruises and allow fore&aft standing headroom for the ergonomics laid out in #635. HASLER is indeed a bigger boat than even the LONG MICRO. Will we see a LONG MICRO Navigator sail in company with a ply #635 for comparison ? >   > >   Hi All- I have been thinking about the Junk rig recently , and this boat pops up on the forum-I would like to know the principal dimensions. The Isometrics are great , but the numbers would help when looking at the renderings . >   Thanks, Walter Baron >   http://www.oldwharf .com/ > Hi Susanne - if you could see me, you would see me melting. Thanks for the #'s- Walter ------------ --------- --------- ------ Bolger rules!!! - NO "GO AWAY SPAMMER!" posts!!!  Please! - no cursing, flaming, trolling, spamming, respamming, or flogging dead horses - stay on topic, stay on thread, punctuate, no 'Ed, thanks, Fred' posts - Pls add your comments at the TOP, SIGN your posts, and snip away - Plans: Mr. Philip C. Bolger, P.O. Box 1209, Gloucester, MA, 01930, Fax: (978) 282-1349 - Unsubscribe: bolger-unsubscribe@ yahoogroups. com - Open discussion:bolger_coffee_ lounge-subscribe @yahoogroups. comYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:    http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/bolger/ <*> Your email settings:     Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to:    http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/bolger/ join     (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email:    bolger-digest@ yahoogroups. com    bolger-fullfeatured @yahoogroups. com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:    bolger-unsubscribe@ yahoogroups. com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:    http://docs. yahoo.com/ info/terms/

>
> Hello Walter,
> it is too hazy today to see you across Massachusetts Bay...
>
> Specs for #635 are:
> 20' length, 8' beam, 2' draft, 313 feet of sail on tabernacled masts, 6350lbs displacement at DWL i.e. with load.
>
> Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Walter
> To:bolger@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 8:53 AM
> Subject: [bolger] Re: #635 Col. H.G. Hasler model and more ruminations
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Inbolger@yahoogroups.com, "Susanne@" <philbolger@> wrote:
> >
> > In response to Prairiedog's input in June on the topic and his comparison with MICRO (Navigator), I should add that the boxkeel configuration should offer more speed due to that stretched-out displacement. It most certainly should carry more supplies for long cruises and allow fore&aft standing headroom for the ergonomics laid out in #635. HASLER is indeed a bigger boat than even the LONG MICRO. Will we see a LONG MICRO Navigator sail in company with a ply #635 for comparison ?
> >
> Hi All- I have been thinking about the Junk rig recently , and this boat pops up on the forum-I would like to know the principal dimensions. The Isometrics are great , but the numbers would help when looking at the renderings .
> Thanks, Walter Baron
>http://www.oldwharf.com/
>

----- Original Message -----

From:Walter

To:bolger@yahoogroups.com

Sent:Wednesday, July 21, 2010 8:53 AM

Subject:[bolger] Re: #635 Col. H.G. Hasler model and more ruminations

 

--- Inbolger@yahoogroups.com, "Susanne@..." <philbolger@...> wrote:
>
> In response to Prairiedog's input in June on the topic and his comparison with MICRO (Navigator), I should add that the boxkeel configuration should offer more speed due to that stretched-out displacement. It most certainly should carry more supplies for long cruises and allow fore&aft standing headroom for the ergonomics laid out in #635. HASLER is indeed a bigger boat than even the LONG MICRO. Will we see a LONG MICRO Navigator sail in company with a ply #635 for comparison ?
>
Hi All- I have been thinking about the Junk rig recently , and this boat pops up on the forum-I would like to know the principal dimensions. The Isometrics are great , but the numbers would help when looking at the renderings .
Thanks, Walter Baron
http://www.oldwharf.com/

>
> In response to Prairiedog's input in June on the topic and his comparison with MICRO (Navigator), I should add that the boxkeel configuration should offer more speed due to that stretched-out displacement. It most certainly should carry more supplies for long cruises and allow fore&aft standing headroom for the ergonomics laid out in #635. HASLER is indeed a bigger boat than even the LONG MICRO. Will we see a LONG MICRO Navigator sail in company with a ply #635 for comparison ?
>

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:47 PM,Susanne@...<philbolger@...>wrote:

In response to Prairiedog's input in June on the topic and his comparison with MICRO (Navigator), I should add that the boxkeel configuration should offer more speed due to that stretched-out displacement.  It most certainly should carry more supplies for long cruises and allow fore&aft standing headroom for the ergonomics laid out in #635.

All summer I've been sketching out various variations of Micro with a box keel for exactly the reasons you've stated Susanne. I''m planning to build a 2/3 scale model to see how it works out.

fred s.