RE: [bolger] Re: Anyone work with "Hulls" program?

Frank and Mark, not sure why I’m suddenly being copied on your private emails. Please delete!

 

Thanks, Eric

 

From:bolger@yahoogroups.com [mailto:bolger@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf OfMark Albanese
Sent:Wednesday, December 22, 2010 10:02 PM
To:bolger@yahoogroups.com
Subject:[bolger] Re: Anyone work with "Hulls" program?

 

 

Frank,

 

Hulls, by itself, won't let you move weights around. It just levels out the boat. Once you have a model from it though, use Peter's BoatCalc to nicely analyze that further, including that it purports to let you "set weights" by station.

Get your Java up!

 

Another possibility is Hullforms.

 

BTW The Hulls package includes SneakV.hul, a version similar to John Bell's.

 

Have some pleasant, long winter evenings...

Mark

 

On Dec 20, 2010, at 8:33 AM, f_swygert wrote:



 

I've been reading some about this program (http://www.carlsondesign.com/#Fun_Shareware,scroll down to find link). So it should give me center of bouyancy among other things. If I modified a Sneakeasy to take an inboard similar to the photo in my album, would the "Hulls" program tell me where the new CB would be? I'm thinking I would need to put a stock Sneakeasy hull in, then drop the motor where I would want it. 

Frank,

Hulls, by itself, won't let you move weights around. It just levels out the boat. Once you have a model from it though, use Peter's BoatCalc to nicely analyze that further, including that it purports to let you "set weights" by station.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boatdesign/files/boatCalc/
Get your Java up!

Another possibility is Hullforms.
http://www.hullform.com/

BTW The Hulls package includes SneakV.hul, a version similar to John Bell's.

Have some pleasant, long winter evenings...
Mark
 
On Dec 20, 2010, at 8:33 AM, f_swygert wrote:

 

I've been reading some about this program (http://www.carlsondesign.com/#Fun_Shareware,scroll down to find link). So it should give me center of bouyancy among other things. If I modified a Sneakeasy to take an inboard similar to the photo in my album, would the "Hulls" program tell me where the new CB would be? I'm thinking I would need to put a stock Sneakeasy hull in, then drop the motor where I would want it. 

How did I get roped into this group?

 

Thanks,


Eric

 

Eric Sorensen

Sorensen's Guide to Powerboats, LLC

14 Lakeside Ct

Plattsburgh, NY 12901

Tel: 518 324 7700

Cell: 518 593 1226

Fax: 518 324 7700

eric@...

Skype: ericwsorensen

DUNS: 011922474, CAGE: 5E0Z0, EIN: 26-4595005

 

Email contents and files attached are confidential (unless otherwise indicated). Please notify the sender promptly if you are not the intended recipient. This email is strictly for the attention and use of the individual(s) addressed. Copying, distributing or disclosing any of the contents must be authorized by the sender. Unauthorized copying is subject to remedies allowed under the law. Reasonable measures were applied by the email provider to eliminate electronic defects, however a guarantee to that effect cannot be extended by the sender.

 

 

 

From:bolger@yahoogroups.com [mailto:bolger@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Ofc o'donnell
Sent:Wednesday, December 22, 2010 8:23 AM
To:bolger@yahoogroups.com
Subject:[bolger] Re: Anyone work with "Hulls" program?

 

 

Weston Farmer - I think - did a great article years ago on model powerboat hulls, including using wax (paraffin) as a standin for fuel.

 

=== craig o'donnell

Box 66 Still Pond Md 21667

 



 

Weston Farmer - I think - did a great article years ago on model powerboat hulls, including using wax (paraffin) as a standin for fuel.



=== craig o'donnell
Box 66 Still Pond Md 21667




The basic sneakeasy hardly needs a hulls program to modify. You just expand the lines in proportion. The displacement will vary in direct proportion to increases in beam, depth, or length, to the second power for any two, to the third power for all three.

If you wanted to double the displacement and modify all three in direct proportion, you would multiply the dimensions by the cube route of 2. Etc...

For any of those modifications your CB will remain in the same place. Where it gets tricky is if you double the displacement but use only 50% of the new displacement, then the CB will be different.

I have used plyboats a lot, and there is a new version coming out. I think it is a good thing, as long as you already know how to get there without the program... Making a model is a very sensible idea, you can make a model out of card or aircraft ply, in probably an hour. I use .6 aircraft ply and 1/8" for the bulkheads. You can then do real world test, and you will often see stuff you didn't anticipate from an on-screen model. That said, a sneakeasy is pretty simple.



--- Inbolger@yahoogroups.com, "f_swygert" <farna@...> wrote:
>
> I've been reading some about this program (http://www.carlsondesign.com/#Fun_Shareware,scroll down to find link). So it should give me center of bouyancy among other things. If I modified a Sneakeasy to take an inboard similar to the photo in my album, would the "Hulls" program tell me where the new CB would be? I'm thinking I would need to put a stock Sneakeasy hull in, then drop the motor where I would want it. Using the stock CB, the hull would then need to be modified to retain that CB, or get close to it. The CX500 motorcycle engine I have (water cooled) supposedly weighs ~220 lbs with radiator, carbs, exhaust, and air box. A Chevy Chevette 2.0L weighs ~302 lbs (cast iron block), a little Geo three cylinder ~150 lbs (both without cooling systems, 50-100 lbs more), Ford 2.3L ~300 lbs, and a Honda B18B 326 lbs. Add another 75 lbs for a small manual automotive transmission (for reverse). I find it hard to believe that the Metro (same as Chevy Sprint) engine is about the same weight as the MC engine, but the MC weight does include everything needed to run (subtract 100 lbs for everything but MC engine and it's down to 120 lbs).
>
> Keeping the weight around 400 lbs. just means two full grown adults. Moving the engine slightly forward of the front seating position and the front seating position slightly back should balance the hull back out without further modification. It would reduce the cockpit size, but should still be room for four adults.
>
> Someone mentioned looking at some Michalak designs for a shallow V bottom "Sneakeasier". I'll be doing that! I've had a similar idea -- make the box keel Sneakeasy but slant the bottom on each side of the 2" keel, and maybe reducing the keel max width to 18".
>
I've been reading some about this program (http://www.carlsondesign.com/#Fun_Shareware,scroll down to find link). So it should give me center of bouyancy among other things. If I modified a Sneakeasy to take an inboard similar to the photo in my album, would the "Hulls" program tell me where the new CB would be? I'm thinking I would need to put a stock Sneakeasy hull in, then drop the motor where I would want it. Using the stock CB, the hull would then need to be modified to retain that CB, or get close to it. The CX500 motorcycle engine I have (water cooled) supposedly weighs ~220 lbs with radiator, carbs, exhaust, and air box. A Chevy Chevette 2.0L weighs ~302 lbs (cast iron block), a little Geo three cylinder ~150 lbs (both without cooling systems, 50-100 lbs more), Ford 2.3L ~300 lbs, and a Honda B18B 326 lbs. Add another 75 lbs for a small manual automotive transmission (for reverse). I find it hard to believe that the Metro (same as Chevy Sprint) engine is about the same weight as the MC engine, but the MC weight does include everything needed to run (subtract 100 lbs for everything but MC engine and it's down to 120 lbs).

Keeping the weight around 400 lbs. just means two full grown adults. Moving the engine slightly forward of the front seating position and the front seating position slightly back should balance the hull back out without further modification. It would reduce the cockpit size, but should still be room for four adults.

Someone mentioned looking at some Michalak designs for a shallow V bottom "Sneakeasier". I'll be doing that! I've had a similar idea -- make the box keel Sneakeasy but slant the bottom on each side of the 2" keel, and maybe reducing the keel max width to 18".