Re: MJ cabin
Hi -
Definitely go forward via the hatch. Coincidentally, I just a few
minutes ago finished building the aft hatch. The first coat of epoxy
is curing as we email....
Mike
Definitely go forward via the hatch. Coincidentally, I just a few
minutes ago finished building the aft hatch. The first coat of epoxy
is curing as we email....
Mike
--- Inbolger@egroups.com, col_mooney@g... wrote:
>
> Dear Martha Jane owners and others,
> Please excuse my impatience not having yet received the upgrades,
> (the answer may be in there;) but is there a potential problem
going
> forward past the high cabin? The MAIB sketch shows a hatch behind
> the forward bulkhead, would this me the way forward or do we
envisage
> clambering over the roof? The hatch method would need a step
> underneath it, even then you would need to be fairly nimble to
> clamber up and over. Any thoughts?
>
> Co
Dear Martha Jane owners and others,
Please excuse my impatience not having yet received the upgrades,
(the answer may be in there;) but is there a potential problem going
forward past the high cabin? The MAIB sketch shows a hatch behind
the forward bulkhead, would this me the way forward or do we envisage
clambering over the roof? The hatch method would need a step
underneath it, even then you would need to be fairly nimble to
clamber up and over. Any thoughts?
Col
Please excuse my impatience not having yet received the upgrades,
(the answer may be in there;) but is there a potential problem going
forward past the high cabin? The MAIB sketch shows a hatch behind
the forward bulkhead, would this me the way forward or do we envisage
clambering over the roof? The hatch method would need a step
underneath it, even then you would need to be fairly nimble to
clamber up and over. Any thoughts?
Col