Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

I can't believe it's been a whole year, and yah not a whole hell of a lot of difference.

Scot

--
Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
USCG Captain 100 GRT, Towing and Sailing
Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 26, 2017, at 12:37 PM,philbolger@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Hello All,
     well over a year later since the de facto FACEBOOK ‘ultimatum’/’division’/’schism’  
- as one reflects on the realities around PB&F’s ongoing work in Design, Fisheries-Politics out of America’s Oldest Fishing-Port – our Port ! – , along with progress in matters naval, 
- our unbroken 2-week/4-week publication record on our work across now well over 500 consecutive issues in just MAIB,
- including periodic illustrated reports on hands-on boat-construction using our design-work,
but also
- YAHOO Group traffic, i.e. YAHOO’scontinued existence,
- apparently-permanent FACEBOOK-inaccessibility for PB&F for instance, and for others,
a bunch of ‘head-scratchers’ remain as to why the various disconnects between seemingly-inseparable realities.

Here one of the more puzzling ones, a matter I’ve brought up before:  The numbers of YAHOO Group members should be reflected in MAIB subscriptions – but appears to not be.
How come ?
A year of MAIB is cheaper than a daily ‘special’ coffee for a week.

Nobody offers coffee ‘for free’. 
But some folks claim that they ‘would give anything to get the whole MAIB-canon’ - except that I suspect they’d want that for free, while happily paying for a daily cuppa at least 250-times a year...
Perhaps not surprisingly with this ‘personal view’, they take issue with PB&F and MAIB for not offering more ‘give-away’-goodies... or something irrational as that.  Loopy stuff that from those grown people.

So, what gives ?
Work here continues - and some of it most serious indeed - but you won’t know, unless you are willing to look for it, read about it, perhaps take advantage of it.


Susanne Altenburger, PB&F

Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 8:47 PM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 

My issues also. Facebook is a no go for me.

john

On 03/06/2016 9:45 AM, 'Christopher C. Wetherill'wetherillc@...[bolger] wrote:
My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK





Virus-free.www.avast.com
Hello All,
     well over a year later since the de facto FACEBOOK ‘ultimatum’/’division’/’schism’  
- as one reflects on the realities around PB&F’s ongoing work in Design, Fisheries-Politics out of America’s Oldest Fishing-Port – our Port ! – , along with progress in matters naval, 
- our unbroken 2-week/4-week publication record on our work across now well over 500 consecutive issues in just MAIB,
- including periodic illustrated reports on hands-on boat-construction using our design-work,
but also
- YAHOO Group traffic, i.e. YAHOO’scontinued existence,
- apparently-permanent FACEBOOK-inaccessibility for PB&F for instance, and for others,
a bunch of ‘head-scratchers’ remain as to why the various disconnects between seemingly-inseparable realities.

Here one of the more puzzling ones, a matter I’ve brought up before:  The numbers of YAHOO Group members should be reflected in MAIB subscriptions – but appears to not be.
How come ?
A year of MAIB is cheaper than a daily ‘special’ coffee for a week.

Nobody offers coffee ‘for free’. 
But some folks claim that they ‘would give anything to get the whole MAIB-canon’ - except that I suspect they’d want that for free, while happily paying for a daily cuppa at least 250-times a year...
Perhaps not surprisingly with this ‘personal view’, they take issue with PB&F and MAIB for not offering more ‘give-away’-goodies... or something irrational as that.  Loopy stuff that from those grown people.

So, what gives ?
Work here continues - and some of it most serious indeed - but you won’t know, unless you are willing to look for it, read about it, perhaps take advantage of it.


Susanne Altenburger, PB&F

Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 8:47 PM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 

My issues also. Facebook is a no go for me.

john

On 03/06/2016 9:45 AM, 'Christopher C. Wetherill'wetherillc@...[bolger] wrote:
My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK





Virus-free.www.avast.com

Facebook eats my limited data. YouTube commercials are also data pigs. I refuse to pay to watch a commercial.  Let THEM Pay me. I also refuse to use SELF check out.  I simply don't get paid to check myself out. People are not wise when they play into the wrong side of the market.  I know people who sign 24 month contracts with companies.  What that does for the company is locks prices in so they don't have to compete.  When companies compete we the buyer benefits.  Buyers do self harm by signing contracts.  If a YouTube video has a commercial I simply won't watch the video. If we buy phone service every 30 days and wait 1 day before we refill we hurt the company and that makes them realize phone service is over priced. The buyer has the power to change the market but if we get lazy big companies will use us up.

Blessings Chiefredelk

On Jul 12, 2016 16:46, "'John Kohnen'jhkohnen@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Why is the Bolger Facebook group set up so you HAVE TO sign in to Facebook
to see it? So far it's still possible to have publicly accessible groups
on FB, though They now obscure part of the view with an annoying
persistent message nagging you to join up. <sigh> Anyway, what's the
advantage to blocking the public from viewing the Bolger FB group?

As you might have guessed, I'm one of those who will not do Facebook.
Aside from privacy concerns it's just too d***ed annoying...

I like the Yahoo groups because I can read and reply to postings using
email, without having to bother with  Web pages. There's wonderful stuff
on the WoodenBoat forum, but I rarely visit it becaue of its Web only
format...

On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 13:00:31 -0700, Ron wrote:

> Please Susanne join Facebook and participate in the Bolger group there
> (or just read it for enjoyment).
> ...

--
John (jkohnen@...)
Nothing is really work unless you would rather be doing something else.
(Sir James Barrie)


------------------------------------

------------------------------------

Bolger rules!!!
- NO &quot;GO AWAY SPAMMER!&quot; posts!!!  Please!
- no cursing, flaming, trolling, spamming, respamming, or flogging dead horses
- stay on topic, stay on thread, punctuate, no &#39;Ed, thanks, Fred&#39; posts
- Pls add your comments at the TOP, SIGN your posts, and snip away
- Plans: Mr. Philip C. Bolger, P.O. Box 1209, Gloucester, MA, 01930, Fax:(978) 282-1349
- Unsubscribe:bolger-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
------------------------------------

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bolger/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bolger/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
bolger-digest@yahoogroups.com
bolger-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
bolger-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/

facebook does the nag screen now on most if not all their listings if you are not a facebook member. A feeble attempt for more members. Now, having said that --ENOUGH AGAIN with the facebook stuff- people either like it or have no use for it (I happen to as do many people not like it. However if this nagging  keeps going on and on the yahoo group will start losing more members- me for one. If I wanted a bunch of drama I would join facebook .
Excuse me while I go sail my light schooner. Buy a book read it and share with your friends and be happy.
Take care all.
George Scheck


On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 5:46 PM, "'John Kohnen' jhkohnen@... [bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


Why is the Bolger Facebook group set up so you HAVE TO sign in to Facebook 
to see it? So far it's still possible to have publicly accessible groups 
on FB, though They now obscure part of the view with an annoying 
persistent message nagging you to join up. <sigh> Anyway, what's the 
advantage to blocking the public from viewing the Bolger FB group?

As you might have guessed, I'm one of those who will not do Facebook. 
Aside from privacy concerns it's just too d***ed annoying...

I like the Yahoo groups because I can read and reply to postings using 
email, without having to bother with  Web pages. There's wonderful stuff 
on the WoodenBoat forum, but I rarely visit it becaue of its Web only 
format...

On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 13:00:31 -0700, Ron wrote:

> Please Susanne join Facebook and participate in the Bolger group there 
> (or just read it for enjoyment).
> ...

--
John (jkohnen@...)
Nothing is really work unless you would rather be doing something else. 
(Sir James Barrie)


------------------------------------

------------------------------------

Bolger rules!!!
- NO &quot;GO AWAY SPAMMER!&quot; posts!!!  Please!
- no cursing, flaming, trolling, spamming, respamming, or flogging dead horses
- stay on topic, stay on thread, punctuate, no 'Ed, thanks, Fred' posts
- Pls add your comments at the TOP, SIGN your posts, and snip away
- Plans: Mr. Philip C. Bolger, P.O. Box 1209, Gloucester, MA, 01930, Fax: (978) 282-1349
- Unsubscribe: bolger-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
------------------------------------

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bolger/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bolger/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
   bolger-digest@yahoogroups.com
   bolger-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
   https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/




Why is the Bolger Facebook group set up so you HAVE TO sign in to Facebook
to see it? So far it's still possible to have publicly accessible groups
on FB, though They now obscure part of the view with an annoying
persistent message nagging you to join up. <sigh> Anyway, what's the
advantage to blocking the public from viewing the Bolger FB group?

As you might have guessed, I'm one of those who will not do Facebook.
Aside from privacy concerns it's just too d***ed annoying...

I like the Yahoo groups because I can read and reply to postings using
email, without having to bother with Web pages. There's wonderful stuff
on the WoodenBoat forum, but I rarely visit it becaue of its Web only
format...

On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 13:00:31 -0700, Ron wrote:

> Please Susanne join Facebook and participate in the Bolger group there
> (or just read it for enjoyment).
> ...

--
John (jkohnen@...)
Nothing is really work unless you would rather be doing something else.
(Sir James Barrie)
Please Susanne join Facebook and participate in the Bolger group there (or just read it for enjoyment).

Join Facebook using a pseudonym if you want and keep your profile private.  Here is a recent article with some helpful steps as well -- http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/how-to/social-networks/how-make-facebook-private-secure-your-facebook-profile-3637264/

A more important question is have you contacted http://web.mit.edu/museum/collections/nautical.html or an equivalent institution (http://library.mysticseaport.org/searchre.cfm?cx=001008294681395800055%3Abhbk6o71z4q&cof=FORID%3A11&ie=UTF-8&q=bolger&sa=Online+Collections )

 

 to discuss what happens to the Bolger oeuvre in the future?!?

 

Do you have a family member that can take over plan sales, or do you intend to sell the business, or release all plans into the public domain?

Really none of my business (other than caring about the legacy of an important and creative American enterprise), but it is good to have an estate plan and business transition plan set up and ready to go.

Sincerely,
Ron Pike
Seattle, WA, USA
 
Nothing ‘Left Field’ about this.
This is indeed about rather modest cost to have full and steady access to what this office has put out via print, e.g. MAIB or BDQ and of course the books.
When I rarely see discussions of PB&F MAIB pieces in this forum – nearing 80 since Phil’s death alone – then this suggests that some folks just can’t part with the annual cost of, what (?), $28 for 24 issues and for 8-9 years now $32 for 12 thicker issues.
BDQ is affordable as well.
Both publications are produced not as grand money-making schemes but to share news, insights, fresh thinking. 


Living on RESOLUTION Phil had distinct volume constraints.
So, with a few exceptions, he often kept just his articles out of each magazine he got published in.
Today you’d readily scan the piece once a month and pass the un-mutilated issue on to the local Public Library, Senior Home etc.
On land and with adequate wall-space for a few feet of bookshelves, I have since re-established the full MAIB magazine sequence that include PCB and PB&F work.


The 502 columns remain accessible via MAIB, 978-774-0906.
Of course at some cost per article, likely on the level of having subscribed to MAIB to begin with.

Putting the PCB/PB&F canon in MAIB on a USB-stick takes a fair amount of resources.
Making it online accessible costs more.
Our point in this office has been that while providing steady output via MAIB, BDQ and a few other sources, eventually elements of that work will result in yet another book.
And after very serious disruptions here, a schedule is on track to get the first one into print.
Of course, there will be some only willing to pay for chapters 3, 12 and 35...


One more footnote.
PB&F remains excluded from even viewing the new-&-happy BOLGER-on-FACEBOOK world.
One would have to sign on to the full-scale murky and apparently quite dark business-practices of that venture – something I won’t, and sure won’t induce others to.

Question then is, without apparent willingness to invest in MAIB and BDQ, and thus without any awareness of ‘news’ out of the Bolger office, what ‘new’ stuff will folks be talking about ?


I appreciate those who read printed durable matter, and thus support the producers of those magazines.
More work to come for those willing to read about it...

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F    
 
Sent:Tuesday, July 12, 2016 1:41 AM
Subject:RE: [bolger] MAIB articles
 

Well, I for one, DO have all 500 issues and more, of MAIB -- I am slowly, laboriously, ripping out of each MAIB  issue's pages, the most important section: the Bolger/Altenburger article -- and have amassed several inches already.  Nope, no index, darn it --  except sometimes our Mr. Hallman's wonderful isometrics do give a "sort of" pictorial index which occasionally points to the MAIB issue where the cartoon or article can be found... but not always.  see: http://hallman.org/bolger/isometrics.html.  Another rough and sometimes cumbersome "index" is on MAIB's website page - try: http://www.messingaboutinboats.com/archive.html - search Bolger and you will also be given several other directions to his articles...

 

And yes, I WOULD buy a published compilation of the MAIB/SBJ articles -- in a heartbeat! (if not astronomical in pricing...)

 

Regards,

Wayne Gilham

Tacoma WA

prior owner of a Black Skimmer (genius design!)

 

From:bolger@yahoogroups.com [mailto:bolger@yahoogroups.com]
Sent:Monday, July 11, 2016 7:41 PM
To:bolger@yahoogroups.com
Subject:RE: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 

 

Somehow this discussion got way out in left field.

 

Myself, I have been very happy with ink on paper. I have bought every one of Phil's books when they were published and have kept them. However after many years, storage space has become a problem, and collecting magazine publications like MAIB, small boat journal, etc, is no longer feasible. I bought the second subscription sold by Jon Wilson WoodenBoat magazine and have kept them all. I kept many other magazines for many years, including several years of MAIB, but they all go to recycling now for 3 reasons. 1st they occupied an enormous amount of space which I no longer have. 2nd, most of what was in them I am not interested in rereading. 3rd, I could never find the articles that I was interested in rereading because there were no useful searchable indexes to tell me where to find them in that wall of magazines. The sole exception is WoodenBoat - they published an excellent index for years, and it is still available up to date on a USB stick. So WoodenBoat is the only magazine collection I made that turned out to be of any use. And if some day I have to part with them, I can get ALL the back issues by buying a USB stick.

 

The "momentum of 500 columns" definitely is "unique in design history".The problem is that they are already inaccessible at any price to the vast majority of Bolger and Friends fans.How many fans have 500 back issues of MAIB to refer to? How many of those fans have carefully compiled their own cross-index of all those designs so they can find the designs that are relevant to the concept they are currently thinking about? Bob Hicks is probably the only person alive with 500 back issues of MAIB, and I'll bet that even he does not have an index that will let him quickly find all the issues with "Bolger cat-yawl rigged sharpie hull sailboats".

 

Unless you make a move to assemble and cross-index the 500 MAIB columns into a book, preferably both paper and electronic, this wonderful body of work, much of which is already unknown to most Bolger and Friends fans, will continue to disappear into the pulpers of recycling plants.

 

I understand the pride you take in the momentum of 500 columns, but if you want to establish a legacy, it will have to be in a much more accessible format than MAIB back issues. 

 

Please note that nobody expects you to give books away free. It has to be a profitable venture for you. However small-volume publishing has become very practical now that publishers can individually print books only as they are ordered. And e-books are now a thriving business for a multitude of authors.

 

And please note that a good cross-index is essential to making the book useful as a reference book. My only criticism of Phil's published books is that the indexes were nearly useless - an index listing boat names and pages is not very helpful unless you have already memorized the name and specification of each boat in the book.

 

George King

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


To:bolger@yahoogroups.com
From:bolger@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 15:44:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 

MAIB has been on sort of ‘Blog’ since the early 90s forb Bolger and later us.

He/we produce.
Bob Hicks publishes.

Folks read.

Then discussion can follow wherever...

But things have to be read first...
The substance of the argument should matter. 

Not whether it is in Bob’s pulpy-plain MAIB-format or Mike O’Brien’s fine archival quality acid-free organic-ink BDQ.

If with the momentum of 500 columns – unique in design-history – the ‘problem’ is the ink-on-paper format, then perhaps we should not discuss ink-on-paper plans, boat-designs, etc.

Instead we might hope for ‘the App’ that allows binary code to jump out of the phone on to the shop-floor to produce the...whatever.

 

In the meantime gravity, ink-on-paper plans, and hands-on 3-D building of boats will remain the baseline for any plausible path between boat-idea and being on the water.

And reading 2-D data-sets is unavoidably part of the deal.

Or is it indeed only about paying Bob or Mike for the copy of the mag ?
I can see some folks arguing with the free-to-them/costly-for-PB&F website aesthetics because they have ‘ideas’ about the format...

 

If you want to keep current, then there are are exceedingly affordable ways to stay connected to the past- and future output from this address.
And ink-on-paper stuff will likely come as ink-on-paper stuff...

 

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F 

 

 

 

Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 3:12 PM

Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 

 

 

Well, a blog would be a good place to talk about new designs. You publish your material and then comment follow. Blogs have been very successful for a long time as a means of publishing periodicals.

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA

Shoreline, CT

Sent from my iPhone


On Jun 3, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Joseph Stromskij.stromski@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

For better or worse, the world appears to have moved on from print.....

My blunt opinion: If you want to stir interest in new and existing designs, an online/internet presence of some sort is needed (beyond already obsolescent forums/email groups)

Best,

Joe

 

On Friday, June 3, 2016 12:57 PM, "philbolger@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

On the issue whether YAHOO’s format has slowed down the discussion, it seems that the forum-format may be less of an issue than individual interests.
And that can be a touchy issue.


I sure am not happy about the 7 years of time since Phil’s departure, still without his final manuscripts in print.
A lot of good, sad and bad reasons for that.

The 39-footer #681 SACPAS-3/”GADABOUT” got done, tested and proven.

And there is e.g. also the astonishing reality of our thinking first published in the top-level monthly of this Navy (http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2013-07/landing-craft-21st-centuryhttp://hallman.nfshost.com/bolger/LCU-F.pdf), and then its reflection in the head of the 4-Star Boss of the MARINES herehttp://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2014-06/bridging-our-surface-connector-gap  A lot of work behind this, helping on that (national defense) level of analysis, design and discussion with in-house-resources that therefore did not go towards the books or the catalogue( s). 

But back to today’s concerns.
In terms if the discussions on YAHOO (or wherever), immediate case in point is the 500th column on our work in MAIB in the June 2016 issue, incl. 75+ by me since Phil’s death.

Perhaps I am looking through the wrong YAHOO window, but in my YAHOO-generated input-triggered updates on the discussion’s progress, –topics, -digressions, there has been rather scant reflection of what we/later-I have put into MAIB and (chronologically-) subsequent YAHOO Group discussions – a rather puzzling phenomenon. 

 

I can see that e.g. the ‘Fisheries’ cluster of issues may be under-exciting to quite a few. 

But - assuming I get the right feed – the various sequences of e.g. modifications to a number of his and our buildable-scale powerboat and sailing-cruiser designs appear to have found little resonance here in this YAHOO Group. 

And pretty much the same for getting designs into BOAT DESIGN QUARTERLY, which has featured more Bolger designs than it has had issues.

Two explanations:

1.  “Not interesting enough, certainly without Phil...”

2.  MAIB costs a few bucks every month, with fewer issues of BDQ costing a pinch more... and that is the obstacle.

Well, in either case, there seems little to be done in this office here.
And if cost on such a modest level is the obstacle, then no budget will be there for a plausible stack of materials to get started on even a modest project.

So what gives ?

 

As I’ve said, ‘touchy issue’.

So, I am not sure that the ‘forum-format’ is the challenge.


 

“ Now if that does not rattle the cages...!!??”

 

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F

 

 

 

Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 10:16 AM

Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 

 

Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.


Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F

 

 


 

 




 

 

 

 

Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM

Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 

 

My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:

I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.

Thanks


On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:

 

 

Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.

 

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.

 

Hope to see you guys there!

 

Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK

 

 

 

 

Well, I for one, DO have all 500 issues and more, of MAIB -- I am slowly, laboriously, ripping out of each MAIB  issue's pages, the most important section: the Bolger/Altenburger article -- and have amassed several inches already.  Nope, no index, darn it --  except sometimes our Mr. Hallman's wonderful isometrics do give a "sort of" pictorial index which occasionally points to the MAIB issue where the cartoon or article can be found... but not always.  see: http://hallman.org/bolger/isometrics.html.  Another rough and sometimes cumbersome "index" is on MAIB's website page - try: http://www.messingaboutinboats.com/archive.html - search Bolger and you will also be given several other directions to his articles...

 

And yes, I WOULD buy a published compilation of the MAIB/SBJ articles -- in a heartbeat! (if not astronomical in pricing...)

 

Regards,

Wayne Gilham

Tacoma WA

prior owner of a Black Skimmer (genius design!)

 

From:bolger@yahoogroups.com [mailto:bolger@yahoogroups.com]
Sent:Monday, July 11, 2016 7:41 PM
To:bolger@yahoogroups.com
Subject:RE: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 

 

Somehow this discussion got way out in left field.

 

Myself, I have been very happy with ink on paper. I have bought every one of Phil's books when they were published and have kept them. However after many years, storage space has become a problem, and collecting magazine publications like MAIB, small boat journal, etc, is no longer feasible. I bought the second subscription sold by Jon Wilson WoodenBoat magazine and have kept them all. I kept many other magazines for many years, including several years of MAIB, but they all go to recycling now for 3 reasons. 1st they occupied an enormous amount of space which I no longer have. 2nd, most of what was in them I am not interested in rereading. 3rd, I could never find the articles that I was interested in rereading because there were no useful searchable indexes to tell me where to find them in that wall of magazines. The sole exception is WoodenBoat - they published an excellent index for years, and it is still available up to date on a USB stick. So WoodenBoat is the only magazine collection I made that turned out to be of any use. And if some day I have to part with them, I can get ALL the back issues by buying a USB stick.

 

The "momentum of 500 columns" definitely is "unique in design history".The problem is that they are already inaccessible at any price to the vast majority of Bolger and Friends fans.How many fans have 500 back issues of MAIB to refer to? How many of those fans have carefully compiled their own cross-index of all those designs so they can find the designs that are relevant to the concept they are currently thinking about? Bob Hicks is probably the only person alive with 500 back issues of MAIB, and I'll bet that even he does not have an index that will let him quickly find all the issues with "Bolger cat-yawl rigged sharpie hull sailboats".

 

Unless you make a move to assemble and cross-index the 500 MAIB columns into a book, preferably both paper and electronic, this wonderful body of work, much of which is already unknown to most Bolger and Friends fans, will continue to disappear into the pulpers of recycling plants.

 

I understand the pride you take in the momentum of 500 columns, but if you want to establish a legacy, it will have to be in a much more accessible format than MAIB back issues.  

 

Please note that nobody expects you to give books away free. It has to be a profitable venture for you. However small-volume publishing has become very practical now that publishers can individually print books only as they are ordered. And e-books are now a thriving business for a multitude of authors.

 

And please note that a good cross-index is essential to making the book useful as a reference book. My only criticism of Phil's published books is that the indexes were nearly useless - an index listing boat names and pages is not very helpful unless you have already memorized the name and specification of each boat in the book.

 

George King

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


To:bolger@yahoogroups.com
From:bolger@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 15:44:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 

MAIB has been on sort of ‘Blog’ since the early 90s forb Bolger and later us.

He/we produce.
Bob Hicks publishes.

Folks read.

Then discussion can follow wherever...

But things have to be read first...
The substance of the argument should matter. 

Not whether it is in Bob’s pulpy-plain MAIB-format or Mike O’Brien’s fine archival quality acid-free organic-ink BDQ.

If with the momentum of 500 columns – unique in design-history – the ‘problem’ is the ink-on-paper format, then perhaps we should not discuss ink-on-paper plans, boat-designs, etc.

Instead we might hope for ‘the App’ that allows binary code to jump out of the phone on to the shop-floor to produce the...whatever.

 

In the meantime gravity, ink-on-paper plans, and hands-on 3-D building of boats will remain the baseline for any plausible path between boat-idea and being on the water.

And reading 2-D data-sets is unavoidably part of the deal.

Or is it indeed only about paying Bob or Mike for the copy of the mag ?
I can see some folks arguing with the free-to-them/costly-for-PB&F website aesthetics because they have ‘ideas’ about the format...

 

If you want to keep current, then there are are exceedingly affordable ways to stay connected to the past- and future output from this address.
And ink-on-paper stuff will likely come as ink-on-paper stuff...

 

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F 

 

 

 

Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 3:12 PM

Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 

 

 

Well, a blog would be a good place to talk about new designs. You publish your material and then comment follow. Blogs have been very successful for a long time as a means of publishing periodicals.

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA

Shoreline, CT

Sent from my iPhone


On Jun 3, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Joseph Stromskij.stromski@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

For better or worse, the world appears to have moved on from print.....

My blunt opinion: If you want to stir interest in new and existing designs, an online/internet presence of some sort is needed (beyond already obsolescent forums/email groups)

Best,

Joe

 

On Friday, June 3, 2016 12:57 PM, "philbolger@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

On the issue whether YAHOO’s format has slowed down the discussion, it seems that the forum-format may be less of an issue than individual interests.
And that can be a touchy issue.


I sure am not happy about the 7 years of time since Phil’s departure, still without his final manuscripts in print.
A lot of good, sad and bad reasons for that.

The 39-footer #681 SACPAS-3/”GADABOUT” got done, tested and proven.

And there is e.g. also the astonishing reality of our thinking first published in the top-level monthly of this Navy (http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2013-07/landing-craft-21st-centuryhttp://hallman.nfshost.com/bolger/LCU-F.pdf), and then its reflection in the head of the 4-Star Boss of the MARINES herehttp://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2014-06/bridging-our-surface-connector-gap  A lot of work behind this, helping on that (national defense) level of analysis, design and discussion with in-house-resources that therefore did not go towards the books or the catalogue( s). 

But back to today’s concerns.
In terms if the discussions on YAHOO (or wherever), immediate case in point is the 500th column on our work in MAIB in the June 2016 issue, incl. 75+ by me since Phil’s death.

Perhaps I am looking through the wrong YAHOO window, but in my YAHOO-generated input-triggered updates on the discussion’s progress, –topics, -digressions, there has been rather scant reflection of what we/later-I have put into MAIB and (chronologically-) subsequent YAHOO Group discussions – a rather puzzling phenomenon. 

 

I can see that e.g. the ‘Fisheries’ cluster of issues may be under-exciting to quite a few. 

But - assuming I get the right feed – the various sequences of e.g. modifications to a number of his and our buildable-scale powerboat and sailing-cruiser designs appear to have found little resonance here in this YAHOO Group. 

And pretty much the same for getting designs into BOAT DESIGN QUARTERLY, which has featured more Bolger designs than it has had issues.

Two explanations:

1.  “Not interesting enough, certainly without Phil...”

2.  MAIB costs a few bucks every month, with fewer issues of BDQ costing a pinch more... and that is the obstacle.

Well, in either case, there seems little to be done in this office here.
And if cost on such a modest level is the obstacle, then no budget will be there for a plausible stack of materials to get started on even a modest project.

So what gives ?

 

As I’ve said, ‘touchy issue’.

So, I am not sure that the ‘forum-format’ is the challenge.


 

“ Now if that does not rattle the cages...!!??”

 

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F

 

 

 

Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 10:16 AM

Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 

 

Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.


Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F

 

 


 

 




 

 

 

 

Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM

Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 

 

My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:

I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.

Thanks


On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:

 

 

Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.

 

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.

 

Hope to see you guys there!

 

Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK

 

 

 

 

Somehow this discussion got way out in left field.

Myself, I have been very happy with ink on paper. I have bought every one of Phil's books when they were published and have kept them. However after many years, storage space has become a problem, and collecting magazine publications like MAIB, small boat journal, etc, is no longer feasible. I bought the second subscription sold by Jon Wilson WoodenBoat magazine and have kept them all. I kept many other magazines for many years, including several years of MAIB, but they all go to recycling now for 3 reasons. 1st they occupied an enormous amount of space which I no longer have. 2nd, most of what was in them I am not interested in rereading. 3rd, I could never find the articles that I was interested in rereading because there were no useful searchable indexes to tell me where to find them in that wall of magazines. The sole exception is WoodenBoat - they published an excellent index for years, and it is still available up to date on a USB stick. So WoodenBoat is the only magazine collection I made that turned out to be of any use. And if some day I have to part with them, I can get ALL the back issues by buying a USB stick.

The "momentum of 500 columns" definitely is "unique in design history".The problem is that they are already inaccessible at any price to the vast majority of Bolger and Friends fans.How many fans have 500 back issues of MAIB to refer to? How many of those fans have carefully compiled their own cross-index of all those designs so they can find the designs that are relevant to the concept they are currently thinking about? Bob Hicks is probably the only person alive with 500 back issues of MAIB, and I'll bet that even he does not have an index that will let him quickly find all the issues with "Bolger cat-yawl rigged sharpie hull sailboats".

Unless you make a move to assemble and cross-index the 500 MAIB columns into a book, preferably both paper and electronic, this wonderful body of work, much of which is already unknown to most Bolger and Friends fans, will continue to disappear into the pulpers of recycling plants.

I understand the pride you take in the momentum of 500 columns, but if you want to establish a legacy, it will have to be in a much more accessible format than MAIB back issues.  

Please note that nobody expects you to give books away free. It has to be a profitable venture for you. However small-volume publishing has become very practical now that publishers can individually print books only as they are ordered. And e-books are now a thriving business for a multitude of authors.

And please note that a good cross-index is essential to making the book useful as a reference book. My only criticism of Phil's published books is that the indexes were nearly useless - an index listing boat names and pages is not very helpful unless you have already memorized the name and specification of each boat in the book.

George King









To: bolger@yahoogroups.com
From: bolger@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 15:44:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 
MAIB has been on sort of ‘Blog’ since the early 90s forb Bolger and later us.
He/we produce.
Bob Hicks publishes.
Folks read.
Then discussion can follow wherever...

But things have to be read first...
The substance of the argument should matter. 
Not whether it is in Bob’s pulpy-plain MAIB-format or Mike O’Brien’s fine archival quality acid-free organic-ink BDQ.

If with the momentum of 500 columns – unique in design-history – the ‘problem’ is the ink-on-paper format, then perhaps we should not discuss ink-on-paper plans, boat-designs, etc.
Instead we might hope for ‘the App’ that allows binary code to jump out of the phone on to the shop-floor to produce the...whatever.
 
In the meantime gravity, ink-on-paper plans, and hands-on 3-D building of boats will remain the baseline for any plausible path between boat-idea and being on the water.
And reading 2-D data-sets is unavoidably part of the deal.

Or is it indeed only about paying Bob or Mike for the copy of the mag ?
I can see some folks arguing with the free-to-them/costly-for-PB&F website aesthetics because they have ‘ideas’ about the format...
 
If you want to keep current, then there are are exceedingly affordable ways to stay connected to the past- and future output from this address.
And ink-on-paper stuff will likely come as ink-on-paper stuff...
 
Susanne Altenburger, PB&F 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 3:12 PM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 

Well, a blog would be a good place to talk about new designs. You publish your material and then comment follow. Blogs have been very successful for a long time as a means of publishing periodicals.

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Joseph Stromskij.stromski@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

For better or worse, the world appears to have moved on from print.....
My blunt opinion: If you want to stir interest in new and existing designs, an online/internet presence of some sort is needed (beyond already obsolescent forums/email groups)
Best,
Joe


On Friday, June 3, 2016 12:57 PM, "philbolger@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
On the issue whether YAHOO’s format has slowed down the discussion, it seems that the forum-format may be less of an issue than individual interests.
And that can be a touchy issue.

I sure am not happy about the 7 years of time since Phil’s departure, still without his final manuscripts in print.
A lot of good, sad and bad reasons for that.
The 39-footer #681 SACPAS-3/”GADABOUT” got done, tested and proven.
And there is e.g. also the astonishing reality of our thinking first published in the top-level monthly of this Navy (http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2013-07/landing-craft-21st-centuryhttp://hallman.nfshost.com/bolger/LCU-F.pdf), and then its reflection in the head of the 4-Star Boss of the MARINES herehttp://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2014-06/bridging-our-surface-connector-gap  A lot of work behind this, helping on that (national defense) level of analysis, design and discussion with in-house-resources that therefore did not go towards the books or the catalogue( s). 

But back to today’s concerns.
In terms if the discussions on YAHOO (or wherever), immediate case in point is the 500th column on our work in MAIB in the June 2016 issue, incl. 75+ by me since Phil’s death.
Perhaps I am looking through the wrong YAHOO window, but in my YAHOO-generated input-triggered updates on the discussion’s progress, –topics, -digressions, there has been rather scant reflection of what we/later-I have put into MAIB and (chronologically-) subsequent YAHOO Group discussions – a rather puzzling phenomenon. 
 
I can see that e.g. the ‘Fisheries’ cluster of issues may be under-exciting to quite a few. 
But - assuming I get the right feed – the various sequences of e.g. modifications to a number of his and our buildable-scale powerboat and sailing-cruiser designs appear to have found little resonance here in this YAHOO Group. 
And pretty much the same for getting designs into BOAT DESIGN QUARTERLY, which has featured more Bolger designs than it has had issues.

Two explanations:
1.  “Not interesting enough, certainly without Phil...”
2.  MAIB costs a few bucks every month, with fewer issues of BDQ costing a pinch more... and that is the obstacle.

Well, in either case, there seems little to be done in this office here.
And if cost on such a modest level is the obstacle, then no budget will be there for a plausible stack of materials to get started on even a modest project.
So what gives ?
 
As I’ve said, ‘touchy issue’.

So, I am not sure that the ‘forum-format’ is the challenge.

 
“ Now if that does not rattle the cages...!!??”
 
Susanne Altenburger, PB&F

 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 10:16 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.

Hope to see you guys there!

Thanks,
Gregg Carlson
Tulsa, OK





Susanne, glad you enjoyed the interruption with the pic of my boat. Be glad to help in any way just let me know. I am not a professional builder, just an old retired guy who wanted to sail, wanted a boat  and felt sorry for an  old hull laying in someones back yard. I have kept photos and a log of my progress when redoing her. This will be her 3rd season on the area lakes around here, with a handful of books and hrs on the lake she keeps giving me sailing lessons and enjoyment. That's what is important. Cant get that on facebook.  Take care
George scheck
nothexed@...



On Monday, June 6, 2016 4:44 PM, "philbolger@... [bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Hello there, George.
 
Good visual - and fine distraction from the current temporary ‘atmospherics’.
Boating season underway here as well, although frost was lurking well into May.

Would you be willing to share shots with me at PB&F ?
And it sounds like a good story for the Group, if not MAIB.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
Sent:Monday, June 06, 2016 3:27 PM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook [1 Attachment]
 
 
Greetings from traverse city michigan
Many people don't care for facebook, I have no use for it, yahoo is not dead   and I really don't think badgering back and  forth is really that productive. Must have been almost a dozen emails back and forth in less than 1 day. Just saying.
What is important is the boats ,plans, books and ideas. I have enclosed a picture of my light schooner that I rebuilt from a bare hull that was originally built in the late 70s by a bob wainwright in Leelanau co mi. (same wainwright noted on the plan body in dynamites book) canvas sails, wood pulleys and 3 strand rope. took a year and a half. This is what you get with a quality design. Carry on
George scheck



On Monday, June 6, 2016 8:28 AM, "philbolger@... [bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Good points all.

Furthermore, YAHOO is not ‘dead’ yet.
- One can of course damage its prospects by doing the ...- leaving the ‘sinking’ ship’ before any sinking is actually assured.
- And in terms of having a long-standing group-discussion, it is certainly not a productive idea to arbitrarily split this well-established discussion-forum membership into pieces because of the ever-tempting ‘Dancing Teddy-Bears’ function at FB, which however comes at a distinct cost superimposed upon the GROUP members without any prior discussion.

- Never mind the idea that all this is suddenly dictated without any communications with Phil Bolger & Friends.

- Good thing about that is though, that whatever the FB-incentives may be to see transferred yet another discussion-forum (presumably) ‘turn-key’ into its ‘universe’, PB&F is certainly not in that loop.

- Finally, as reflected in the 75+ MAIB columns since Phil’s death, the post-Phil publicity around our military work, or the ongoing efforts towards a 21st-century fishing-fleet, I can keep working and push PR on our work. 
  But it should not be PB&F’s function to ‘moderate’ this Group to discuss whatever has just hit print or the web. 

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F


 
 
Sent:Monday, June 06, 2016 12:16 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
By the way, of the total 4314 members posted on the front page some 1135 are listed as bouncing emails...


---In bolger@yahoogroups.com, <c.ruzer@...> wrote :

Yahoo mail now is better than it was...

> > It's as simple as that. A discussion of
platforms...




Hello there, George.
 
Good visual - and fine distraction from the current temporary ‘atmospherics’.
Boating season underway here as well, although frost was lurking well into May.

Would you be willing to share shots with me at PB&F ?
And it sounds like a good story for the Group, if not MAIB.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
Sent:Monday, June 06, 2016 3:27 PM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook [1 Attachment]
 
 

Greetings from traverse city michigan
Many people don't care for facebook, I have no use for it, yahoo is not dead   and I really don't think badgering back and  forth is really that productive. Must have been almost a dozen emails back and forth in less than 1 day. Just saying.
What is important is the boats ,plans, books and ideas. I have enclosed a picture of my light schooner that I rebuilt from a bare hull that was originally built in the late 70s by a bob wainwright in Leelanau co mi. (same wainwright noted on the plan body in dynamites book) canvas sails, wood pulleys and 3 strand rope. took a year and a half. This is what you get with a quality design. Carry on
George scheck



On Monday, June 6, 2016 8:28 AM, "philbolger@... [bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Good points all.

Furthermore, YAHOO is not ‘dead’ yet.
- One can of course damage its prospects by doing the ...- leaving the ‘sinking’ ship’ before any sinking is actually assured.
- And in terms of having a long-standing group-discussion, it is certainly not a productive idea to arbitrarily split this well-established discussion-forum membership into pieces because of the ever-tempting ‘Dancing Teddy-Bears’ function at FB, which however comes at a distinct cost superimposed upon the GROUP members without any prior discussion.

- Never mind the idea that all this is suddenly dictated without any communications with Phil Bolger & Friends.

- Good thing about that is though, that whatever the FB-incentives may be to see transferred yet another discussion-forum (presumably) ‘turn-key’ into its ‘universe’, PB&F is certainly not in that loop.

- Finally, as reflected in the 75+ MAIB columns since Phil’s death, the post-Phil publicity around our military work, or the ongoing efforts towards a 21st-century fishing-fleet, I can keep working and push PR on our work. 
  But it should not be PB&F’s function to ‘moderate’ this Group to discuss whatever has just hit print or the web. 

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F


 
 
Sent:Monday, June 06, 2016 12:16 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
By the way, of the total 4314 members posted on the front page some 1135 are listed as bouncing emails...


---In bolger@yahoogroups.com, <c.ruzer@...> wrote :

Yahoo mail now is better than it was...

> > It's as simple as that. A discussion of
platforms...


Right on George. I had a Light Schooner (back then it was named Scooner). They are really fast on a reach. Tender too. Four or five people on the rail will hold it down. Great fun.

 

JohnT

 


From:bolger@yahoogroups.com [mailto:bolger@yahoogroups.com]
Sent:Monday, June 06, 2016 3:28 PM
To:bolger@yahoogroups.com
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook [1 Attachment]

 

 

Greetings from traverse city michigan

Many people don't care for facebook, I have no use for it, yahoo is not dead   and I really don't think badgering back and  forth is really that productive. Must have been almost a dozen emails back and forth in less than 1 day. Just saying.

What is important is the boats ,plans, books and ideas. I have enclosed a picture of my light schooner that I rebuilt from a bare hull that was originally built in the late 70s by a bob wainwright in Leelanau co mi. (same wainwright noted on the plan body in dynamites book) canvas sails, wood pulleys and 3 strand rope. took a year and a half. This is what you get with a quality design. Carry on

George scheck

 

 

On Monday, June 6, 2016 8:28 AM, "philbolger@... [bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

Good points all.


Furthermore, YAHOO is not ‘dead’ yet.
- One can of course damage its prospects by doing the ...- leaving the ‘sinking’ ship’ before any sinking is actually assured.

- And in terms of having a long-standing group-discussion, it is certainly not a productive idea to arbitrarily split this well-established discussion-forum membership into pieces because of the ever-tempting ‘Dancing Teddy-Bears’ function at FB, which however comes at a distinct cost superimposed upon the GROUP members without any prior discussion.

- Never mind the idea that all this is suddenly dictated without any communications with Phil Bolger & Friends.

- Good thing about that is though, that whatever the FB-incentives may be to see transferred yet another discussion-forum (presumably) ‘turn-key’ into its ‘universe’, PB&F is certainly not in that loop.

- Finally, as reflected in the 75+ MAIB columns since Phil’s death, the post-Phil publicity around our military work, or the ongoing efforts towards a 21st-century fishing-fleet, I can keep working and push PR on our work. 
  But it should not be PB&F’s function to ‘moderate’ this Group to discuss whatever has just hit print or the web. 

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F


 

 

Sent:Monday, June 06, 2016 12:16 AM

Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 

 

By the way, of the total 4314 members posted on the front page some 1135 are listed as bouncing emails...



---In bolger@yahoogroups.com, <c.ruzer@...> wrote :

Yahoo mail now is better than it was...


> > It's as simple as that. A discussion of platforms...

 

Greetings from traverse city michigan
Many people don't care for facebook, I have no use for it, yahoo is not dead   and I really don't think badgering back and  forth is really that productive. Must have been almost a dozen emails back and forth in less than 1 day. Just saying.
What is important is the boats ,plans, books and ideas. I have enclosed a picture of my light schooner that I rebuilt from a bare hull that was originally built in the late 70s by a bob wainwright in Leelanau co mi. (same wainwright noted on the plan body in dynamites book) canvas sails, wood pulleys and 3 strand rope. took a year and a half. This is what you get with a quality design. Carry on
George scheck



On Monday, June 6, 2016 8:28 AM, "philbolger@... [bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Good points all.

Furthermore, YAHOO is not ‘dead’ yet.
- One can of course damage its prospects by doing the ...- leaving the ‘sinking’ ship’ before any sinking is actually assured.
- And in terms of having a long-standing group-discussion, it is certainly not a productive idea to arbitrarily split this well-established discussion-forum membership into pieces because of the ever-tempting ‘Dancing Teddy-Bears’ function at FB, which however comes at a distinct cost superimposed upon the GROUP members without any prior discussion.

- Never mind the idea that all this is suddenly dictated without any communications with Phil Bolger & Friends.

- Good thing about that is though, that whatever the FB-incentives may be to see transferred yet another discussion-forum (presumably) ‘turn-key’ into its ‘universe’, PB&F is certainly not in that loop.

- Finally, as reflected in the 75+ MAIB columns since Phil’s death, the post-Phil publicity around our military work, or the ongoing efforts towards a 21st-century fishing-fleet, I can keep working and push PR on our work. 
  But it should not be PB&F’s function to ‘moderate’ this Group to discuss whatever has just hit print or the web. 

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F


 
 
Sent:Monday, June 06, 2016 12:16 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
By the way, of the total 4314 members posted on the front page some 1135 are listed as bouncing emails...


---In bolger@yahoogroups.com, <c.ruzer@...> wrote :

Yahoo mail now is better than it was...

> > It's as simple as that. A discussion of
platforms...


Good points all.

Furthermore, YAHOO is not ‘dead’ yet.
- One can of course damage its prospects by doing the ...- leaving the ‘sinking’ ship’ before any sinking is actually assured.
- And in terms of having a long-standing group-discussion, it is certainly not a productive idea to arbitrarily split this well-established discussion-forum membership into pieces because of the ever-tempting ‘Dancing Teddy-Bears’ function at FB, which however comes at a distinct cost superimposed upon the GROUP members without any prior discussion.

- Never mind the idea that all this is suddenly dictated without any communications with Phil Bolger & Friends.

- Good thing about that is though, that whatever the FB-incentives may be to see transferred yet another discussion-forum (presumably) ‘turn-key’ into its ‘universe’, PB&F is certainly not in that loop.

- Finally, as reflected in the 75+ MAIB columns since Phil’s death, the post-Phil publicity around our military work, or the ongoing efforts towards a 21st-century fishing-fleet, I can keep working and push PR on our work. 
  But it should not be PB&F’s function to ‘moderate’ this Group to discuss whatever has just hit print or the web. 

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F


 
 
Sent:Monday, June 06, 2016 12:16 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 

By the way, of the total 4314 members posted on the front page some 1135 are listed as bouncing emails...



---In bolger@yahoogroups.com, <c.ruzer@...> wrote :

Yahoo mail now is better than it was...


> > It's as simple as that. A discussion of
platforms...

 By the way, of the total 4314 members posted on the front page some 1135 are listed as bouncing emails...



---In bolger@yahoogroups.com, <c.ruzer@...> wrote :

Yahoo mail now is better than it was...


> > It's as simple as that. A discussion of platforms...

Yahoo mail now is better than it was. I use it muchly. I've used it and Yahoo Groups for some 18 years continuously with the same account, except for this additional one begun about seven years ago... ahem...  Yahoo has never been exposed as grossly breaching my trust, privacy, or rights in any way approaching the way FB has.


Yes, I preferred the Yahoo Groups before this "upgrade" version. That said, this clunky(?) version has been stable for some years now and has kept pretty much all of the facilities of the original...


That said I offer as an exampleanother somewhat comparable boat community's web platformthat doesn't cost all that much annually to run. That annual amount is covered, or largely offset, by an annual fund raising drive for donations from members. It started as a response to clunky(?) poorly maintained discussion pages on the JWD site. JWD post there occasionally. It is said the smaller membership there atWharram Builders and Friends can more than cover the website expenses if each member donates as little as $5...  Money? Not a lot. Yes, the website there is in the hands of an owner, but so too this yahoo group.. Both seem to have worked well don't you think?



---In bolger@yahoogroups.com, <scot.mcpherson@...> wrote :

Ok guys enough of the FUD and Anti-FUD. It's ridiculous...

The question is what is a good platform to rely on for our continued discussions and sharing of and about PB&F and similar works...

It's as simple as that. A discussion of platforms...

I notice lately here that even local businesses' FB pages are becoming more obscured from view - say half or more of the screen blocked by an overlay invitation to join FB that cannot be adequately removed. Such a pain! In sync with that I also notice that, say, businesses such as the butcher's daily specials are running over more than one day now, which I suspect is because they don't clear the discounted product due to prospective shoppers not interested in FB not being attracted to the shop by the almost illegible FB posted ad... Commerce, freedom, and information sharing and disemination is being risked by FB's fanatical global drive to control -  don't let it happen in the bolgerverse!

---In bolger@yahoogroups.com, <scot.mcpherson@...> wrote :

Anything and everything that is posted or uploaded to Facebook becomes the property of Facebook. You sure you want that?

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

 

Evidence please. And why is the FB page not set for public viewing?

---In bolger@yahoogroups.com, <dave.irland@...> wrote :

Funny thing, while the debate about privacy, paranoia, access, and giving stuff away for free (nobody's suggesting that, by the way) rages here on Yahoo for its audience of about five, the FB page has 123 new members and over 30 posts/comments, not counting the dozens of "thumbs up"s, and several pics, not least of which is a lovely picture of a Slicer

Personally I'd rather stick to yahoo since I'm used to it.I will probably have to investigate going on facebook for other reasons but at the moment I'd rather stay put.
cheers
Andy Airey
Hello All:

At age 77 I consider myself a semi-Luddite.

I just joined the Phil Bolger and Friends Group on Facebook.

It ain’t that hard.

Regards to all,

Bill Howard
Nellysford VA

“I have built a boat, and will die a happy man.”

On Jun 4, 2016, at 7:38 PM, Scotscot.mcpherson@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Ok guys enough of the FUD and Anti-FUD. It's ridiculous.

There are facts and let's talk about them if you wish, but let's keep terms like "the great Saran" and "big brother" and all that rut out it.

The question is what is a good platform to rely on for our continued discussions and sharing of and about PB&F and similar works. Susanne has a business to run, so no one is trying to instantly grant public domain rights to those works, but it would be nice to have an archive of our discussions for reference, and perhaps a way that's easier for Susanne to store, share and sell PB&F copyrighted materials if she chose to do that.

It's as simple as that. A discussion of platforms.

Thank you,
Scot

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone
> 


Hear, hear. Define requirements, list need to haves and nice to haves, consider public, private, open source, and paid options, and then pick one and move forward.

I agree Yahoo groups it's moribund and a dying platform. I don't care one way or the other about Facebook. If future development of e-commerce options is desired, though, some CMS with extensibility would be better.

--Gabriel

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 4, 2016, at 6:38 PM, Scotscot.mcpherson@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Ok guys enough of the FUD and Anti-FUD. It's ridiculous.

There are facts and let's talk about them if you wish, but let's keep terms like "the great Saran" and "big brother" and all that rut out it.

The question is what is a good platform to rely on for our continued discussions and sharing of and about PB&F and similar works. Susanne has a business to run, so no one is trying to instantly grant public domain rights to those works, but it would be nice to have an archive of our discussions for reference, and perhaps a way that's easier for Susanne to store, share and sell PB&F copyrighted materials if she chose to do that.

It's as simple as that. A discussion of platforms.

Thank you,
Scot

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone
>

Ok guys enough of the FUD and Anti-FUD. It's ridiculous.

There are facts and let's talk about them if you wish, but let's keep terms like "the great Saran" and "big brother" and all that rut out it.

The question is what is a good platform to rely on for our continued discussions and sharing of and about PB&F and similar works. Susanne has a business to run, so no one is trying to instantly grant public domain rights to those works, but it would be nice to have an archive of our discussions for reference, and perhaps a way that's easier for Susanne to store, share and sell PB&F copyrighted materials if she chose to do that.

It's as simple as that. A discussion of platforms.

Thank you,
Scot



Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone
>
Anything and everything on facebook is owned by facebook!!???? wake up please. for ease of use you are selling to the wrong entity. yes its questionable. but who has the power to win?.
send me my e-mails when books are published I will read them gladly at home and you wil not see my face on facebook again. oh and I said that 60% of what can be found of me came from facebook, I made an error I turned the number upside down .It is 90%.
 
talking about books . has anyone at MAIB  thought about making books out of past isseu,s . just a thought.
.
 
about being caught in a spiderweb, the last two months here in the Netherlands television, during the news broadcast they tell you half of the story, if you want to know more you only have to app or go via the internet to read more. is it not to bore people with something they do not want to know? or is it that those who are interrested can then be tracked to a topic??!big brother is nearer then you might guess.
  
 
 
 
 
greetings from the Netherlands. Hilbert
The package – to the extent that it can be known – of FB-practices appears to be amongst the darker such on the web; hence e.g. the recent frenetics about ‘new’ privacy-‘settings’...
Ergo PB&F’s statement yesterday that PB&F won’t support any affiliation with FB, including the ‘herding’ of YAHOO-Group members based on one individual’s arbitrary unilateral uncoordinated decision in favor of ‘greener pastures’ somewhere, whatever the cost to the group or to PB&F.
This YAHOO Group has become a public forum on matters of work by Phil Bolger and Phil Bolger & Friends, based on Phil’s-, our-, and since 2009 my work, and of course the interests of several thousand members who through their own personal input, their boat-projects and cruising-stories have determined the extent and relative liveliness of this forum.
Its future depends on PB&F’s proceedings, each member’s interests to engage, and YAHOO’s viability such as through this Group.

As to the ‘value’ of 2 Billion FB members, for PB&F this is more of a threat of unmanageable expose than any sort of promise.
To propose this as a net advance ‘for the cause’ is based on too many assumptions to list.
PB&F has pursued its current and future course of action based on its understanding of this particular business since 1952 and thus in-house metrics guiding related decisions. 

In term of ‘rage against the machine’, naive-to-adventurous speculations notwithstanding from a ‘drive-by’ casual perspective, PB&F has been driven for a very long time by principles of sobriety Phil pursued for decades earlier in regards to ‘fads’, ‘group-think’ and fashionable but dubious temptations.
The broad range of successful work confirms the utility of this approach. 
All the giddiest sales-pitches would have never had e.g. the US Navy knock on our door, or could address the worsening crisis of the US commercial fishing industry and its science - or just allow clear-cut focus on the essentials for design-work.

In keeping with this approach, PB&F will neither follow this migration to FB, nor implicitly nor explicitly suggest others to enter that particular system of decided unknowns and already known losses/costs.
The old Lemmings story does not lose its relevance.

Protecting as much privacy as possible is neither easy nor at all times ‘convenient’ but remains a doable objective, in fact an ethical imperative.
Not doing so has already resulted in all sorts of breaches of conventional assumptions and confidences, with ugly and tragic consequences, unnecessarily adding to uncertainties and incivilities from such breaches.
And that before legal matters kick in hard.

In the meantime, I’d suggest absorbing past, current, and future work in print with MAIB, BDQ, the books, and all the older SMALL BOAT JOURNAL, YACHTING etc. articles covering Phil’s thinking all the way back into the early 1950s.
There is a lot to feast on, without mega-corporate fine-print standing on the way of your studies.

In comparison with this rich ink-on-paper record across 60+ years accessible to all who care, FB is offering exactly what of any substance ?!
O.k there is that perky ‘Dancing Teddy-Bears”-function you can dial in... or was that ‘Square-Dancing Cats‘... 
That ‘excitement’ though may at best appeal to those who can’t bring themselves to subscribe to a few modest periodicals put out by stalwart friends of Phil Bolger indeed...


Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
      




  

 
 
Sent:Saturday, June 04, 2016 4:32 PM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 

Anything and everything that is posted or uploaded to Facebook becomes the property of Facebook. You sure you want that?

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 4, 2016, at 9:40 AM, 'Connor, Patrick'pconnor@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

All for a Bolger Facebook page. Three reasons:

1. Facebook is easy to use and intuitive. Making posts and uploading photos is easy and instantaneous. The Yahoo groups functionality is unreliable, archaic and candidly, a pain in the ass to use. I have never been able master the damn thing. It is certainly a factor in the decline of the forum.
 
2. You can control privacy on FB. In any case every one of us had to compromise  our "privacy" -such as it exists in the digital world- when we were required to set up our Yahoo account to use this forum. If folks aren't interested in using Facebook, only join this group and don't "Friend". Set your privacy settings to max.
 
3. Use of FB or other digital tools is not mutually exclusive to using bound books. I have a library in my home and read in both formats every day. We don't dirty ourselves by going digital.
 
A lot of this discussion seems to me to be centered around other issues totally unrelated to Phil's boats- rage against the machine, fear of the unknown, and maybe resentment of the fact that someone came up with an idea that lots of people liked and made a bunch of money from it. Good for him. And who cares anyway? It's a great tool and a great way to share information about lots of stuff, including great boats. There are discussion groups for other boats and boat types on Facebook.  I don't think the quality of the content or discussion was degraded one whit because it was on Facebook.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 4, 2016, at 8:31 AM,dave.irland@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Funny thing, while the debate about privacy, paranoia, access, and giving stuff away for free (nobody's suggesting that, by the way) rages here on Yahoo for its audience of about five, the FB page has 123 new members and over 30 posts/comments, not counting the dozens of "thumbs up"s, and several pics, not least of which is a lovely picture of a Slicer

For "serious" discussion, you can hang onto Yahoo. Or some other "serious" venue. For fun, advancement of PB&F, and a lively, engaged and user friendly platform, FB is already off and running, and has more posts in the last few days than this Yahoo page has had in about four months.

Your choice. (And, as Scott pointed out, you control what you put on FB. As for "snooping" and "privacy" and Zuckerberg's supposedly nefarious world domination, I hope people realize that their information has been harvested a long, long time ago by entities ranging from that little Goodreads account to that epoxy you ordered on Amazon.)

None whatsoever. The pictures I post on FB are retained in other versions of digital media. They're mine. I'm sure in their multi hundred page license agreements the other product providers lay claim to them too. I already made a decision to publicly put my musings out there in the public when I make a post on Facebook or post a picture. I'm not looking to monetize those things. The fact is, anything put out on the Internet is out there in the public domain  and can be used (or misused) by anyone else. If one doesn't want someone to see something they have, better not put it on a computer at all, or at least keep that box unplugged from the ether. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 4, 2016, at 4:31 PM, Scotscot.mcpherson@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Anything and everything that is posted or uploaded to Facebook becomes the property of Facebook. You sure you want that?

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 4, 2016, at 9:40 AM, 'Connor, Patrick'pconnor@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

All for a Bolger Facebook page. Three reasons:

1. Facebook is easy to use and intuitive. Making posts and uploading photos is easy and instantaneous. The Yahoo groups functionality is unreliable, archaic and candidly, a pain in the ass to use. I have never been able master the damn thing. It is certainly a factor in the decline of the forum. 

2. You can control privacy on FB. In any case every one of us had to compromise  our "privacy" -such as it exists in the digital world- when we were required to set up our Yahoo account to use this forum. If folks aren't interested in using Facebook, only join this group and don't "Friend". Set your privacy settings to max. 

3. Use of FB or other digital tools is not mutually exclusive to using bound books. I have a library in my home and read in both formats every day. We don't dirty ourselves by going digital.

A lot of this discussion seems to me to be centered around other issues totally unrelated to Phil's boats- rage against the machine, fear of the unknown, and maybe resentment of the fact that someone came up with an idea that lots of people liked and made a bunch of money from it. Good for him. And who cares anyway? It's a great tool and a great way to share information about lots of stuff, including great boats. There are discussion groups for other boats and boat types on Facebook.  I don't think the quality of the content or discussion was degraded one whit because it was on Facebook. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 4, 2016, at 8:31 AM,dave.irland@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Funny thing, while the debate about privacy, paranoia, access, and giving stuff away for free (nobody's suggesting that, by the way) rages here on Yahoo for its audience of about five, the FB page has 123 new members and over 30 posts/comments, not counting the dozens of "thumbs up"s, and several pics, not least of which is a lovely picture of a Slicer

For "serious" discussion, you can hang onto Yahoo. Or some other "serious" venue. For fun, advancement of PB&F, and a lively, engaged and user friendly platform, FB is already off and running, and has more posts in the last few days than this Yahoo page has had in about four months.

Your choice. (And, as Scott pointed out, you control what you put on FB. As for "snooping" and "privacy" and Zuckerberg's supposedly nefarious world domination, I hope people realize that their information has been harvested a long, long time ago by entities ranging from that little Goodreads account to that epoxy you ordered on Amazon.)

Anything that is posted ANYWHERE on the Internet becomes , de facto, public property. 
Relax FB isn't the great Satan. There are plenty of informed and thoughtful discussions on FB and offenders are easily and quickly removed from a group. 

Leigh Ross

484-464-1575 (C)



On Jun 4, 2016, at 4:32 PM, Scotscot.mcpherson@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Anything and everything that is posted or uploaded to Facebook becomes the property of Facebook. You sure you want that?

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 4, 2016, at 9:40 AM, 'Connor, Patrick'pconnor@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

All for a Bolger Facebook page. Three reasons:

1. Facebook is easy to use and intuitive. Making posts and uploading photos is easy and instantaneous. The Yahoo groups functionality is unreliable, archaic and candidly, a pain in the ass to use. I have never been able master the damn thing. It is certainly a factor in the decline of the forum. 

2. You can control privacy on FB. In any case every one of us had to compromise  our "privacy" -such as it exists in the digital world- when we were required to set up our Yahoo account to use this forum. If folks aren't interested in using Facebook, only join this group and don't "Friend". Set your privacy settings to max. 

3. Use of FB or other digital tools is not mutually exclusive to using bound books. I have a library in my home and read in both formats every day. We don't dirty ourselves by going digital.

A lot of this discussion seems to me to be centered around other issues totally unrelated to Phil's boats- rage against the machine, fear of the unknown, and maybe resentment of the fact that someone came up with an idea that lots of people liked and made a bunch of money from it. Good for him. And who cares anyway? It's a great tool and a great way to share information about lots of stuff, including great boats. There are discussion groups for other boats and boat types on Facebook.  I don't think the quality of the content or discussion was degraded one whit because it was on Facebook. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 4, 2016, at 8:31 AM,dave.irland@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Funny thing, while the debate about privacy, paranoia, access, and giving stuff away for free (nobody's suggesting that, by the way) rages here on Yahoo for its audience of about five, the FB page has 123 new members and over 30 posts/comments, not counting the dozens of "thumbs up"s, and several pics, not least of which is a lovely picture of a Slicer

For "serious" discussion, you can hang onto Yahoo. Or some other "serious" venue. For fun, advancement of PB&F, and a lively, engaged and user friendly platform, FB is already off and running, and has more posts in the last few days than this Yahoo page has had in about four months.

Your choice. (And, as Scott pointed out, you control what you put on FB. As for "snooping" and "privacy" and Zuckerberg's supposedly nefarious world domination, I hope people realize that their information has been harvested a long, long time ago by entities ranging from that little Goodreads account to that epoxy you ordered on Amazon.)

Anything and everything that is posted or uploaded to Facebook becomes the property of Facebook. You sure you want that?

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 4, 2016, at 9:40 AM, 'Connor, Patrick'pconnor@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

All for a Bolger Facebook page. Three reasons:

1. Facebook is easy to use and intuitive. Making posts and uploading photos is easy and instantaneous. The Yahoo groups functionality is unreliable, archaic and candidly, a pain in the ass to use. I have never been able master the damn thing. It is certainly a factor in the decline of the forum. 

2. You can control privacy on FB. In any case every one of us had to compromise  our "privacy" -such as it exists in the digital world- when we were required to set up our Yahoo account to use this forum. If folks aren't interested in using Facebook, only join this group and don't "Friend". Set your privacy settings to max. 

3. Use of FB or other digital tools is not mutually exclusive to using bound books. I have a library in my home and read in both formats every day. We don't dirty ourselves by going digital.

A lot of this discussion seems to me to be centered around other issues totally unrelated to Phil's boats- rage against the machine, fear of the unknown, and maybe resentment of the fact that someone came up with an idea that lots of people liked and made a bunch of money from it. Good for him. And who cares anyway? It's a great tool and a great way to share information about lots of stuff, including great boats. There are discussion groups for other boats and boat types on Facebook.  I don't think the quality of the content or discussion was degraded one whit because it was on Facebook. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 4, 2016, at 8:31 AM,dave.irland@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Funny thing, while the debate about privacy, paranoia, access, and giving stuff away for free (nobody's suggesting that, by the way) rages here on Yahoo for its audience of about five, the FB page has 123 new members and over 30 posts/comments, not counting the dozens of "thumbs up"s, and several pics, not least of which is a lovely picture of a Slicer

For "serious" discussion, you can hang onto Yahoo. Or some other "serious" venue. For fun, advancement of PB&F, and a lively, engaged and user friendly platform, FB is already off and running, and has more posts in the last few days than this Yahoo page has had in about four months.

Your choice. (And, as Scott pointed out, you control what you put on FB. As for "snooping" and "privacy" and Zuckerberg's supposedly nefarious world domination, I hope people realize that their information has been harvested a long, long time ago by entities ranging from that little Goodreads account to that epoxy you ordered on Amazon.)

All for a Bolger Facebook page. Three reasons:

1. Facebook is easy to use and intuitive. Making posts and uploading photos is easy and instantaneous. The Yahoo groups functionality is unreliable, archaic and candidly, a pain in the ass to use. I have never been able master the damn thing. It is certainly a factor in the decline of the forum. 

2. You can control privacy on FB. In any case every one of us had to compromise  our "privacy" -such as it exists in the digital world- when we were required to set up our Yahoo account to use this forum. If folks aren't interested in using Facebook, only join this group and don't "Friend". Set your privacy settings to max. 

3. Use of FB or other digital tools is not mutually exclusive to using bound books. I have a library in my home and read in both formats every day. We don't dirty ourselves by going digital.

A lot of this discussion seems to me to be centered around other issues totally unrelated to Phil's boats- rage against the machine, fear of the unknown, and maybe resentment of the fact that someone came up with an idea that lots of people liked and made a bunch of money from it. Good for him. And who cares anyway? It's a great tool and a great way to share information about lots of stuff, including great boats. There are discussion groups for other boats and boat types on Facebook.  I don't think the quality of the content or discussion was degraded one whit because it was on Facebook. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 4, 2016, at 8:31 AM,dave.irland@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Funny thing, while the debate about privacy, paranoia, access, and giving stuff away for free (nobody's suggesting that, by the way) rages here on Yahoo for its audience of about five, the FB page has 123 new members and over 30 posts/comments, not counting the dozens of "thumbs up"s, and several pics, not least of which is a lovely picture of a Slicer

For "serious" discussion, you can hang onto Yahoo. Or some other "serious" venue. For fun, advancement of PB&F, and a lively, engaged and user friendly platform, FB is already off and running, and has more posts in the last few days than this Yahoo page has had in about four months.

Your choice. (And, as Scott pointed out, you control what you put on FB. As for "snooping" and "privacy" and Zuckerberg's supposedly nefarious world domination, I hope people realize that their information has been harvested a long, long time ago by entities ranging from that little Goodreads account to that epoxy you ordered on Amazon.)

And, what is so good about Yahoo Groups, anyway? It always has problems, one way or another, for all or single members. FB, or a real private forum is my vote. And FB has the advantage of already being here, and has vast acceptance of being a necessary evil by 90% of people. And it's not that evil anyway. You can be as private as you like with a little research. Yahoo groups was only ever a stepping stone to facebook, or whatever comes after. Because Yahoo Groups will fail soon, I vote we ALL move to FB. Much more interesting and lively anway. 



From:"dave.irland@... [bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com>
To:bolger@yahoogroups.com
Sent:Saturday, 4 June 2016, 22:47
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 
And for the record, I despise the individual Facebook profiles, including my own. "My life is more photogenic and full of excitement than yours" contests are not all that happens there, by a long shot--and you don't have to participate in that. The interest groups have no equal. Check the Woodenboat forum(s), they are popping with life and interest and take you strange and unexpected places. Yahoo, no offense .... well Suzanne mentions "clay tablets"....


And for the record, I despise the individual Facebook profiles, including my own. "My life is more photogenic and full of excitement than yours" contests are not all that happens there, by a long shot--and you don't have to participate in that. The interest groups have no equal. Check the Woodenboat forum(s), they are popping with life and interest and take you strange and unexpected places. Yahoo, no offense .... well Suzanne mentions "clay tablets"....
Funny thing, while the debate about privacy, paranoia, access, and giving stuff away for free (nobody's suggesting that, by the way) rages here on Yahoo for its audience of about five, the FB page has 123 new members and over 30 posts/comments, not counting the dozens of "thumbs up"s, and several pics, not least of which is a lovely picture of a Slicer

For "serious" discussion, you can hang onto Yahoo. Or some other "serious" venue. For fun, advancement of PB&F, and a lively, engaged and user friendly platform, FB is already off and running, and has more posts in the last few days than this Yahoo page has had in about four months.

Your choice. (And, as Scott pointed out, you control what you put on FB. As for "snooping" and "privacy" and Zuckerberg's supposedly nefarious world domination, I hope people realize that their information has been harvested a long, long time ago by entities ranging from that little Goodreads account to that epoxy you ordered on Amazon.)
I don't understand how either of those have anything to do with the proposal. I am talking about an archive of stuff such as this list, correspondences and discussions. I never meant to imply that you give up your livelihood by giving everything away for free.

You can control who those trustees are that hold the keys.

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2016, at 3:52 PM,philbolger@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Boy do I know about this.
But....
Where to begin to explain the obvious ?
1. This is a business...
2. Its business is not IT, successive generations of code-management, or keeping ‘online-interconnected’ with...
3. Without a plausible economic base to generate designs, we’d discuss what ?
4. Folks interested in the work may have to actually read about it...
Etc.

If the expectation is that the entire Archive would ever be fully online ‘for the convenience’ versus in a sequence of books, articles etc. I would not hold my breath because of item #1, based on #3 etc.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 3:23 PM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 

Susanne,
I agree with you. I like paper. I have several copies of the books I really want to keep for archiving and for availability to share now and again.
 
However as far as eCopies being ephemeral, there are ways around this, unless of course the whole world crashed. That possibility not withstanding, the open source world has created methods of information sharing, collaboration and duplication (meaning backups).
 
If a primary system were stood up to archive electronic versions of plans, books, articles, correspondence, and discussions, anyone who wished to become another archive could just join the project and all info would flow to the new member system, and updates and new additions would flow incrementally.
 
There are lots of platforms available to do this, and it's used for thousands of projects, mostly software, but it's just as valid for any sort of documentation for information distribution and archiving.
 
 

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2016, at 3:09 PM,philbolger@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Yeah, I’ve been advised on this for quite a long time now.

But, books, articles and PLANS (!) can not disappear under malware-impact, hostage-ware, or just personal technical incompetence while migrating from one OS to the next. etc.

And how could you read a MARCH 1932 issue of THE RUDDER in any e-format ? 
Someone has to have a physical copy,
- scan it at whatever expense,
- post it at whatever expense,
and
- then upgrade the file-format forever-more ??

Not sustainable. 
Not even for GOOGLE. 
And who knows where they’ll be in 10 years ? 

Under odd lingo of ‘convenience’ folks have giddily proposed electronic plans-formats... ??!!

‘Temporary’ libraries such as via ‘KINDLE’ etc are spooky ideas to spend any resources on.
For ‘Harlequin Novels’, sure. 
But what else ?
Even the local paper needs physical copies for any archival ambitions.
Short-term/E-term ‘memory’ seems a dicey model to manage basic knowledge, including designs for boats.

So, if e-format were the preferred modality, then we might go e-format all the way and strap on those boating-simulation goggles and let that CPU-chip do all the work for you...

Freebie-mentality remains equally unsustainable, since folks pay lots for ISP-services but then expect stuff for possibly free from then on ?
Meaning lots of Dollars to the uncreative ‘conduit’-folks, but little to none for the content-generators who actually do the work on which the system depends to begin with ?
Not sustainable.

Luddite mentality ?
No.  But selectively discriminating in the balance of cost vs. benefit.
As is my responsibility under principles of sustainability, here towards Phil’s and our Archive.
I can’t have file-format issues or ISP-proceedings seriously impact this work.

Those who won’t read stuff generated here at PB&F don’t matter.
It’s always been about self-selection.
And if you are interested, the most ‘durable‘ format’ should be the most agreeable since most lasting, most reliable, forever offering stimulus or just fond memories – irrespective of some OS.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
  
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 2:27 PM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
For better or worse, the world appears to have moved on from print.....
My blunt opinion: If you want to stir interest in new and existing designs, an online/internet presence of some sort is needed (beyond already obsolescent forums/email groups)
Best,
Joe


On Friday, June 3, 2016 12:57 PM, "philbolger@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
On the issue whether YAHOO’s format has slowed down the discussion, it seems that the forum-format may be less of an issue than individual interests.
And that can be a touchy issue.

I sure am not happy about the 7 years of time since Phil’s departure, still without his final manuscripts in print.
A lot of good, sad and bad reasons for that.
The 39-footer #681 SACPAS-3/”GADABOUT” got done, tested and proven.
And there is e.g. also the astonishing reality of our thinking first published in the top-level monthly of this Navy (http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2013-07/landing-craft-21st-centuryhttp://hallman.nfshost.com/bolger/LCU-F.pdf), and then its reflection in the head of the 4-Star Boss of the MARINES herehttp://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2014-06/bridging-our-surface-connector-gap  A lot of work behind this, helping on that (national defense) level of analysis, design and discussion with in-house-resources that therefore did not go towards the books or the catalogue( s). 

But back to today’s concerns.
In terms if the discussions on YAHOO (or wherever), immediate case in point is the 500th column on our work in MAIB in the June 2016 issue, incl. 75+ by me since Phil’s death.
Perhaps I am looking through the wrong YAHOO window, but in my YAHOO-generated input-triggered updates on the discussion’s progress, –topics, -digressions, there has been rather scant reflection of what we/later-I have put into MAIB and (chronologically-) subsequent YAHOO Group discussions – a rather puzzling phenomenon. 
 
I can see that e.g. the ‘Fisheries’ cluster of issues may be under-exciting to quite a few. 
But - assuming I get the right feed – the various sequences of e.g. modifications to a number of his and our buildable-scale powerboat and sailing-cruiser designs appear to have found little resonance here in this YAHOO Group. 
And pretty much the same for getting designs into BOAT DESIGN QUARTERLY, which has featured more Bolger designs than it has had issues.

Two explanations:
1.  “Not interesting enough, certainly without Phil...”
2.  MAIB costs a few bucks every month, with fewer issues of BDQ costing a pinch more... and that is the obstacle.

Well, in either case, there seems little to be done in this office here.
And if cost on such a modest level is the obstacle, then no budget will be there for a plausible stack of materials to get started on even a modest project.
So what gives ?
 
As I’ve said, ‘touchy issue’.

So, I am not sure that the ‘forum-format’ is the challenge.

 
“ Now if that does not rattle the cages...!!??”
 
Susanne Altenburger, PB&F

 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 10:16 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.

Hope to see you guys there!

Thanks,
Gregg Carlson
Tulsa, OK




My issues also. Facebook is a no go for me.

john

On 03/06/2016 9:45 AM, 'Christopher C. Wetherill'wetherillc@...[bolger] wrote:
My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK





Virus-free.www.avast.com
Greg Kay,if “the importance is in the information, not the format’, then the information will be offered via ink on paper, whether discussing the design or the design itself.
The format should not matter then.
So why not subscribe to MAIB and BDQ ?

FB-centric technophilia is just as ‘backwards’ since arbitrarily myopic to its many-layered costs, as insisting on clay-tablets when books are available.

And since it apparently needs spelling out just a tad, for a rich range of legal reasons alone, PB&F would not support any FB-platform-based ‘conveniences’... !
PB&F needs not to get into that morass...


Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 3:57 PM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 

I like books too, but things are what they are; the importance is in the information, not the format. I'm sure this same argument was put forth during the switch from scrolls to books, or during the invention of scrolls themselves; someone must have poo-pooed the idea, saying, "Now a clay tablet; that's permanence."

Good day . I have used facebook and everything you do there can be tracked by others. since I quiet 60 percent of of what I could be traced on is gone. so no I don,t like facebook. butI will mis this group and if there are books to come I would like to know. and no I am not signing to facebook again.
 greetings Hilbert.
I like books too, but things are what they are; the importance is in the information, not the format. I'm sure this same argument was put forth during the switch from scrolls to books, or during the invention of scrolls themselves; someone must have poo-pooed the idea, saying, "Now a clay tablet; that's permanence." 

Boy do I know about this.
But....
Where to begin to explain the obvious ?
1. This is a business...
2. Its business is not IT, successive generations of code-management, or keeping ‘online-interconnected’ with...
3. Without a plausible economic base to generate designs, we’d discuss what ?
4. Folks interested in the work may have to actually read about it...
Etc.

If the expectation is that the entire Archive would ever be fully online ‘for the convenience’ versus in a sequence of books, articles etc. I would not hold my breath because of item #1, based on #3 etc.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 3:23 PM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 

Susanne,
I agree with you. I like paper. I have several copies of the books I really want to keep for archiving and for availability to share now and again.
 
However as far as eCopies being ephemeral, there are ways around this, unless of course the whole world crashed. That possibility not withstanding, the open source world has created methods of information sharing, collaboration and duplication (meaning backups).
 
If a primary system were stood up to archive electronic versions of plans, books, articles, correspondence, and discussions, anyone who wished to become another archive could just join the project and all info would flow to the new member system, and updates and new additions would flow incrementally.
 
There are lots of platforms available to do this, and it's used for thousands of projects, mostly software, but it's just as valid for any sort of documentation for information distribution and archiving.
 
 

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2016, at 3:09 PM,philbolger@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Yeah, I’ve been advised on this for quite a long time now.

But, books, articles and PLANS (!) can not disappear under malware-impact, hostage-ware, or just personal technical incompetence while migrating from one OS to the next. etc.

And how could you read a MARCH 1932 issue of THE RUDDER in any e-format ? 
Someone has to have a physical copy,
- scan it at whatever expense,
- post it at whatever expense,
and
- then upgrade the file-format forever-more ??

Not sustainable. 
Not even for GOOGLE. 
And who knows where they’ll be in 10 years ? 

Under odd lingo of ‘convenience’ folks have giddily proposed electronic plans-formats... ??!!

‘Temporary’ libraries such as via ‘KINDLE’ etc are spooky ideas to spend any resources on.
For ‘Harlequin Novels’, sure. 
But what else ?
Even the local paper needs physical copies for any archival ambitions.
Short-term/E-term ‘memory’ seems a dicey model to manage basic knowledge, including designs for boats.

So, if e-format were the preferred modality, then we might go e-format all the way and strap on those boating-simulation goggles and let that CPU-chip do all the work for you...

Freebie-mentality remains equally unsustainable, since folks pay lots for ISP-services but then expect stuff for possibly free from then on ?
Meaning lots of Dollars to the uncreative ‘conduit’-folks, but little to none for the content-generators who actually do the work on which the system depends to begin with ?
Not sustainable.

Luddite mentality ?
No.  But selectively discriminating in the balance of cost vs. benefit.
As is my responsibility under principles of sustainability, here towards Phil’s and our Archive.
I can’t have file-format issues or ISP-proceedings seriously impact this work.

Those who won’t read stuff generated here at PB&F don’t matter.
It’s always been about self-selection.
And if you are interested, the most ‘durable‘ format’ should be the most agreeable since most lasting, most reliable, forever offering stimulus or just fond memories – irrespective of some OS.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
  
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 2:27 PM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
For better or worse, the world appears to have moved on from print.....
My blunt opinion: If you want to stir interest in new and existing designs, an online/internet presence of some sort is needed (beyond already obsolescent forums/email groups)
Best,
Joe


On Friday, June 3, 2016 12:57 PM, "philbolger@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
On the issue whether YAHOO’s format has slowed down the discussion, it seems that the forum-format may be less of an issue than individual interests.
And that can be a touchy issue.

I sure am not happy about the 7 years of time since Phil’s departure, still without his final manuscripts in print.
A lot of good, sad and bad reasons for that.
The 39-footer #681 SACPAS-3/”GADABOUT” got done, tested and proven.
And there is e.g. also the astonishing reality of our thinking first published in the top-level monthly of this Navy (http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2013-07/landing-craft-21st-centuryhttp://hallman.nfshost.com/bolger/LCU-F.pdf), and then its reflection in the head of the 4-Star Boss of the MARINES herehttp://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2014-06/bridging-our-surface-connector-gap  A lot of work behind this, helping on that (national defense) level of analysis, design and discussion with in-house-resources that therefore did not go towards the books or the catalogue( s). 

But back to today’s concerns.
In terms if the discussions on YAHOO (or wherever), immediate case in point is the 500th column on our work in MAIB in the June 2016 issue, incl. 75+ by me since Phil’s death.
Perhaps I am looking through the wrong YAHOO window, but in my YAHOO-generated input-triggered updates on the discussion’s progress, –topics, -digressions, there has been rather scant reflection of what we/later-I have put into MAIB and (chronologically-) subsequent YAHOO Group discussions – a rather puzzling phenomenon. 
 
I can see that e.g. the ‘Fisheries’ cluster of issues may be under-exciting to quite a few. 
But - assuming I get the right feed – the various sequences of e.g. modifications to a number of his and our buildable-scale powerboat and sailing-cruiser designs appear to have found little resonance here in this YAHOO Group. 
And pretty much the same for getting designs into BOAT DESIGN QUARTERLY, which has featured more Bolger designs than it has had issues.

Two explanations:
1.  “Not interesting enough, certainly without Phil...”
2.  MAIB costs a few bucks every month, with fewer issues of BDQ costing a pinch more... and that is the obstacle.

Well, in either case, there seems little to be done in this office here.
And if cost on such a modest level is the obstacle, then no budget will be there for a plausible stack of materials to get started on even a modest project.
So what gives ?
 
As I’ve said, ‘touchy issue’.

So, I am not sure that the ‘forum-format’ is the challenge.

 
“ Now if that does not rattle the cages...!!??”
 
Susanne Altenburger, PB&F

 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 10:16 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.

Hope to see you guys there!

Thanks,
Gregg Carlson
Tulsa, OK




MAIB has been on sort of ‘Blog’ since the early 90s forb Bolger and later us.
He/we produce.
Bob Hicks publishes.
Folks read.
Then discussion can follow wherever...

But things have to be read first...
The substance of the argument should matter. 
Not whether it is in Bob’s pulpy-plain MAIB-format or Mike O’Brien’s fine archival quality acid-free organic-ink BDQ.

If with the momentum of 500 columns – unique in design-history – the ‘problem’ is the ink-on-paper format, then perhaps we should not discuss ink-on-paper plans, boat-designs, etc.
Instead we might hope for ‘the App’ that allows binary code to jump out of the phone on to the shop-floor to produce the...whatever.
 
In the meantime gravity, ink-on-paper plans, and hands-on 3-D building of boats will remain the baseline for any plausible path between boat-idea and being on the water.
And reading 2-D data-sets is unavoidably part of the deal.

Or is it indeed only about paying Bob or Mike for the copy of the mag ?
I can see some folks arguing with the free-to-them/costly-for-PB&F website aesthetics because they have ‘ideas’ about the format...
 
If you want to keep current, then there are are exceedingly affordable ways to stay connected to the past- and future output from this address.
And ink-on-paper stuff will likely come as ink-on-paper stuff...
 
Susanne Altenburger, PB&F 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 3:12 PM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 

Well, a blog would be a good place to talk about new designs. You publish your material and then comment follow. Blogs have been very successful for a long time as a means of publishing periodicals.

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Joseph Stromskij.stromski@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

For better or worse, the world appears to have moved on from print.....
My blunt opinion: If you want to stir interest in new and existing designs, an online/internet presence of some sort is needed (beyond already obsolescent forums/email groups)
Best,
Joe


On Friday, June 3, 2016 12:57 PM, "philbolger@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
On the issue whether YAHOO’s format has slowed down the discussion, it seems that the forum-format may be less of an issue than individual interests.
And that can be a touchy issue.

I sure am not happy about the 7 years of time since Phil’s departure, still without his final manuscripts in print.
A lot of good, sad and bad reasons for that.
The 39-footer #681 SACPAS-3/”GADABOUT” got done, tested and proven.
And there is e.g. also the astonishing reality of our thinking first published in the top-level monthly of this Navy (http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2013-07/landing-craft-21st-centuryhttp://hallman.nfshost.com/bolger/LCU-F.pdf), and then its reflection in the head of the 4-Star Boss of the MARINES herehttp://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2014-06/bridging-our-surface-connector-gap  A lot of work behind this, helping on that (national defense) level of analysis, design and discussion with in-house-resources that therefore did not go towards the books or the catalogue( s). 

But back to today’s concerns.
In terms if the discussions on YAHOO (or wherever), immediate case in point is the 500th column on our work in MAIB in the June 2016 issue, incl. 75+ by me since Phil’s death.
Perhaps I am looking through the wrong YAHOO window, but in my YAHOO-generated input-triggered updates on the discussion’s progress, –topics, -digressions, there has been rather scant reflection of what we/later-I have put into MAIB and (chronologically-) subsequent YAHOO Group discussions – a rather puzzling phenomenon. 
 
I can see that e.g. the ‘Fisheries’ cluster of issues may be under-exciting to quite a few. 
But - assuming I get the right feed – the various sequences of e.g. modifications to a number of his and our buildable-scale powerboat and sailing-cruiser designs appear to have found little resonance here in this YAHOO Group. 
And pretty much the same for getting designs into BOAT DESIGN QUARTERLY, which has featured more Bolger designs than it has had issues.

Two explanations:
1.  “Not interesting enough, certainly without Phil...”
2.  MAIB costs a few bucks every month, with fewer issues of BDQ costing a pinch more... and that is the obstacle.

Well, in either case, there seems little to be done in this office here.
And if cost on such a modest level is the obstacle, then no budget will be there for a plausible stack of materials to get started on even a modest project.
So what gives ?
 
As I’ve said, ‘touchy issue’.

So, I am not sure that the ‘forum-format’ is the challenge.

 
“ Now if that does not rattle the cages...!!??”
 
Susanne Altenburger, PB&F

 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 10:16 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.

Hope to see you guys there!

Thanks,
Gregg Carlson
Tulsa, OK




Susanne,
I agree with you. I like paper. I have several copies of the books I really want to keep for archiving and for availability to share now and again.

However as far as eCopies being ephemeral, there are ways around this, unless of course the whole world crashed. That possibility not withstanding, the open source world has created methods of information sharing, collaboration and duplication (meaning backups).

If a primary system were stood up to archive electronic versions of plans, books, articles, correspondence, and discussions, anyone who wished to become another archive could just join the project and all info would flow to the new member system, and updates and new additions would flow incrementally.

There are lots of platforms available to do this, and it's used for thousands of projects, mostly software, but it's just as valid for any sort of documentation for information distribution and archiving.



Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2016, at 3:09 PM,philbolger@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Yeah, I’ve been advised on this for quite a long time now.

But, books, articles and PLANS (!) can not disappear under malware-impact, hostage-ware, or just personal technical incompetence while migrating from one OS to the next. etc.

And how could you read a MARCH 1932 issue of THE RUDDER in any e-format ? 
Someone has to have a physical copy,
- scan it at whatever expense,
- post it at whatever expense,
and
- then upgrade the file-format forever-more ??

Not sustainable. 
Not even for GOOGLE. 
And who knows where they’ll be in 10 years ? 

Under odd lingo of ‘convenience’ folks have giddily proposed electronic plans-formats... ??!!

‘Temporary’ libraries such as via ‘KINDLE’ etc are spooky ideas to spend any resources on.
For ‘Harlequin Novels’, sure. 
But what else ?
Even the local paper needs physical copies for any archival ambitions.
Short-term/E-term ‘memory’ seems a dicey model to manage basic knowledge, including designs for boats.

So, if e-format were the preferred modality, then we might go e-format all the way and strap on those boating-simulation goggles and let that CPU-chip do all the work for you...

Freebie-mentality remains equally unsustainable, since folks pay lots for ISP-services but then expect stuff for possibly free from then on ?
Meaning lots of Dollars to the uncreative ‘conduit’-folks, but little to none for the content-generators who actually do the work on which the system depends to begin with ?
Not sustainable.

Luddite mentality ?
No.  But selectively discriminating in the balance of cost vs. benefit.
As is my responsibility under principles of sustainability, here towards Phil’s and our Archive.
I can’t have file-format issues or ISP-proceedings seriously impact this work.

Those who won’t read stuff generated here at PB&F don’t matter.
It’s always been about self-selection.
And if you are interested, the most ‘durable‘ format’ should be the most agreeable since most lasting, most reliable, forever offering stimulus or just fond memories – irrespective of some OS.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
  
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 2:27 PM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 

For better or worse, the world appears to have moved on from print.....
My blunt opinion: If you want to stir interest in new and existing designs, an online/internet presence of some sort is needed (beyond already obsolescent forums/email groups)
Best,
Joe


On Friday, June 3, 2016 12:57 PM, "philbolger@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
On the issue whether YAHOO’s format has slowed down the discussion, it seems that the forum-format may be less of an issue than individual interests.
And that can be a touchy issue.

I sure am not happy about the 7 years of time since Phil’s departure, still without his final manuscripts in print.
A lot of good, sad and bad reasons for that.
The 39-footer #681 SACPAS-3/”GADABOUT” got done, tested and proven.
And there is e.g. also the astonishing reality of our thinking first published in the top-level monthly of this Navy (http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2013-07/landing-craft-21st-centuryhttp://hallman.nfshost.com/bolger/LCU-F.pdf), and then its reflection in the head of the 4-Star Boss of the MARINES herehttp://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2014-06/bridging-our-surface-connector-gap  A lot of work behind this, helping on that (national defense) level of analysis, design and discussion with in-house-resources that therefore did not go towards the books or the catalogue( s). 

But back to today’s concerns.
In terms if the discussions on YAHOO (or wherever), immediate case in point is the 500th column on our work in MAIB in the June 2016 issue, incl. 75+ by me since Phil’s death.
Perhaps I am looking through the wrong YAHOO window, but in my YAHOO-generated input-triggered updates on the discussion’s progress, –topics, -digressions, there has been rather scant reflection of what we/later-I have put into MAIB and (chronologically-) subsequent YAHOO Group discussions – a rather puzzling phenomenon. 
 
I can see that e.g. the ‘Fisheries’ cluster of issues may be under-exciting to quite a few. 
But - assuming I get the right feed – the various sequences of e.g. modifications to a number of his and our buildable-scale powerboat and sailing-cruiser designs appear to have found little resonance here in this YAHOO Group. 
And pretty much the same for getting designs into BOAT DESIGN QUARTERLY, which has featured more Bolger designs than it has had issues.

Two explanations:
1.  “Not interesting enough, certainly without Phil...”
2.  MAIB costs a few bucks every month, with fewer issues of BDQ costing a pinch more... and that is the obstacle.

Well, in either case, there seems little to be done in this office here.
And if cost on such a modest level is the obstacle, then no budget will be there for a plausible stack of materials to get started on even a modest project.
So what gives ?
 
As I’ve said, ‘touchy issue’.

So, I am not sure that the ‘forum-format’ is the challenge.

 
“ Now if that does not rattle the cages...!!??”
 
Susanne Altenburger, PB&F

 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 10:16 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.

Hope to see you guys there!

Thanks,
Gregg Carlson
Tulsa, OK




Well, a blog would be a good place to talk about new designs. You publish your material and then comment follow. Blogs have been very successful for a long time as a means of publishing periodicals.

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Joseph Stromskij.stromski@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

For better or worse, the world appears to have moved on from print.....
My blunt opinion: If you want to stir interest in new and existing designs, an online/internet presence of some sort is needed (beyond already obsolescent forums/email groups)
Best,
Joe


On Friday, June 3, 2016 12:57 PM, "philbolger@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
On the issue whether YAHOO’s format has slowed down the discussion, it seems that the forum-format may be less of an issue than individual interests.
And that can be a touchy issue.

I sure am not happy about the 7 years of time since Phil’s departure, still without his final manuscripts in print.
A lot of good, sad and bad reasons for that.
The 39-footer #681 SACPAS-3/”GADABOUT” got done, tested and proven.
And there is e.g. also the astonishing reality of our thinking first published in the top-level monthly of this Navy (http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2013-07/landing-craft-21st-centuryhttp://hallman.nfshost.com/bolger/LCU-F.pdf), and then its reflection in the head of the 4-Star Boss of the MARINES herehttp://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2014-06/bridging-our-surface-connector-gap  A lot of work behind this, helping on that (national defense) level of analysis, design and discussion with in-house-resources that therefore did not go towards the books or the catalogue( s). 

But back to today’s concerns.
In terms if the discussions on YAHOO (or wherever), immediate case in point is the 500th column on our work in MAIB in the June 2016 issue, incl. 75+ by me since Phil’s death.
Perhaps I am looking through the wrong YAHOO window, but in my YAHOO-generated input-triggered updates on the discussion’s progress, –topics, -digressions, there has been rather scant reflection of what we/later-I have put into MAIB and (chronologically-) subsequent YAHOO Group discussions – a rather puzzling phenomenon. 
 
I can see that e.g. the ‘Fisheries’ cluster of issues may be under-exciting to quite a few. 
But - assuming I get the right feed – the various sequences of e.g. modifications to a number of his and our buildable-scale powerboat and sailing-cruiser designs appear to have found little resonance here in this YAHOO Group. 
And pretty much the same for getting designs into BOAT DESIGN QUARTERLY, which has featured more Bolger designs than it has had issues.

Two explanations:
1.  “Not interesting enough, certainly without Phil...”
2.  MAIB costs a few bucks every month, with fewer issues of BDQ costing a pinch more... and that is the obstacle.

Well, in either case, there seems little to be done in this office here.
And if cost on such a modest level is the obstacle, then no budget will be there for a plausible stack of materials to get started on even a modest project.
So what gives ?
 
As I’ve said, ‘touchy issue’.

So, I am not sure that the ‘forum-format’ is the challenge.

 
“ Now if that does not rattle the cages...!!??”
 
Susanne Altenburger, PB&F

 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 10:16 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.

Hope to see you guys there!

Thanks,
Gregg Carlson
Tulsa, OK




Yeah, I’ve been advised on this for quite a long time now.

But, books, articles and PLANS (!) can not disappear under malware-impact, hostage-ware, or just personal technical incompetence while migrating from one OS to the next. etc.

And how could you read a MARCH 1932 issue of THE RUDDER in any e-format ? 
Someone has to have a physical copy,
- scan it at whatever expense,
- post it at whatever expense,
and
- then upgrade the file-format forever-more ??

Not sustainable. 
Not even for GOOGLE. 
And who knows where they’ll be in 10 years ? 

Under odd lingo of ‘convenience’ folks have giddily proposed electronic plans-formats... ??!!

‘Temporary’ libraries such as via ‘KINDLE’ etc are spooky ideas to spend any resources on.
For ‘Harlequin Novels’, sure. 
But what else ?
Even the local paper needs physical copies for any archival ambitions.
Short-term/E-term ‘memory’ seems a dicey model to manage basic knowledge, including designs for boats.

So, if e-format were the preferred modality, then we might go e-format all the way and strap on those boating-simulation goggles and let that CPU-chip do all the work for you...

Freebie-mentality remains equally unsustainable, since folks pay lots for ISP-services but then expect stuff for possibly free from then on ?
Meaning lots of Dollars to the uncreative ‘conduit’-folks, but little to none for the content-generators who actually do the work on which the system depends to begin with ?
Not sustainable.

Luddite mentality ?
No.  But selectively discriminating in the balance of cost vs. benefit.
As is my responsibility under principles of sustainability, here towards Phil’s and our Archive.
I can’t have file-format issues or ISP-proceedings seriously impact this work.

Those who won’t read stuff generated here at PB&F don’t matter.
It’s always been about self-selection.
And if you are interested, the most ‘durable‘ format’ should be the most agreeable since most lasting, most reliable, forever offering stimulus or just fond memories – irrespective of some OS.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
  
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 2:27 PM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 

For better or worse, the world appears to have moved on from print.....
My blunt opinion: If you want to stir interest in new and existing designs, an online/internet presence of some sort is needed (beyond already obsolescent forums/email groups)
Best,
Joe


On Friday, June 3, 2016 12:57 PM, "philbolger@... [bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
On the issue whether YAHOO’s format has slowed down the discussion, it seems that the forum-format may be less of an issue than individual interests.
And that can be a touchy issue.

I sure am not happy about the 7 years of time since Phil’s departure, still without his final manuscripts in print.
A lot of good, sad and bad reasons for that.
The 39-footer #681 SACPAS-3/”GADABOUT” got done, tested and proven.
And there is e.g. also the astonishing reality of our thinking first published in the top-level monthly of this Navy (http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2013-07/landing-craft-21st-centuryhttp://hallman.nfshost.com/bolger/LCU-F.pdf), and then its reflection in the head of the 4-Star Boss of the MARINES herehttp://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2014-06/bridging-our-surface-connector-gap  A lot of work behind this, helping on that (national defense) level of analysis, design and discussion with in-house-resources that therefore did not go towards the books or the catalogue( s). 

But back to today’s concerns.
In terms if the discussions on YAHOO (or wherever), immediate case in point is the 500th column on our work in MAIB in the June 2016 issue, incl. 75+ by me since Phil’s death.
Perhaps I am looking through the wrong YAHOO window, but in my YAHOO-generated input-triggered updates on the discussion’s progress, –topics, -digressions, there has been rather scant reflection of what we/later-I have put into MAIB and (chronologically-) subsequent YAHOO Group discussions – a rather puzzling phenomenon. 
 
I can see that e.g. the ‘Fisheries’ cluster of issues may be under-exciting to quite a few. 
But - assuming I get the right feed – the various sequences of e.g. modifications to a number of his and our buildable-scale powerboat and sailing-cruiser designs appear to have found little resonance here in this YAHOO Group. 
And pretty much the same for getting designs into BOAT DESIGN QUARTERLY, which has featured more Bolger designs than it has had issues.

Two explanations:
1.  “Not interesting enough, certainly without Phil...”
2.  MAIB costs a few bucks every month, with fewer issues of BDQ costing a pinch more... and that is the obstacle.

Well, in either case, there seems little to be done in this office here.
And if cost on such a modest level is the obstacle, then no budget will be there for a plausible stack of materials to get started on even a modest project.
So what gives ?
 
As I’ve said, ‘touchy issue’.

So, I am not sure that the ‘forum-format’ is the challenge.

 
“ Now if that does not rattle the cages...!!??”
 
Susanne Altenburger, PB&F

 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 10:16 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.

Hope to see you guys there!

Thanks,
Gregg Carlson
Tulsa, OK




For better or worse, the world appears to have moved on from print.....
My blunt opinion: If you want to stir interest in new and existing designs, an online/internet presence of some sort is needed (beyond already obsolescent forums/email groups)
Best,
Joe


On Friday, June 3, 2016 12:57 PM, "philbolger@... [bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
On the issue whether YAHOO’s format has slowed down the discussion, it seems that the forum-format may be less of an issue than individual interests.
And that can be a touchy issue.

I sure am not happy about the 7 years of time since Phil’s departure, still without his final manuscripts in print.
A lot of good, sad and bad reasons for that.
The 39-footer #681 SACPAS-3/”GADABOUT” got done, tested and proven.
And there is e.g. also the astonishing reality of our thinking first published in the top-level monthly of this Navy (http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2013-07/landing-craft-21st-centuryhttp://hallman.nfshost.com/bolger/LCU-F.pdf), and then its reflection in the head of the 4-Star Boss of the MARINES herehttp://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2014-06/bridging-our-surface-connector-gap  A lot of work behind this, helping on that (national defense) level of analysis, design and discussion with in-house-resources that therefore did not go towards the books or the catalogue( s). 

But back to today’s concerns.
In terms if the discussions on YAHOO (or wherever), immediate case in point is the 500th column on our work in MAIB in the June 2016 issue, incl. 75+ by me since Phil’s death.
Perhaps I am looking through the wrong YAHOO window, but in my YAHOO-generated input-triggered updates on the discussion’s progress, –topics, -digressions, there has been rather scant reflection of what we/later-I have put into MAIB and (chronologically-) subsequent YAHOO Group discussions – a rather puzzling phenomenon. 
 
I can see that e.g. the ‘Fisheries’ cluster of issues may be under-exciting to quite a few. 
But - assuming I get the right feed – the various sequences of e.g. modifications to a number of his and our buildable-scale powerboat and sailing-cruiser designs appear to have found little resonance here in this YAHOO Group. 
And pretty much the same for getting designs into BOAT DESIGN QUARTERLY, which has featured more Bolger designs than it has had issues.

Two explanations:
1.  “Not interesting enough, certainly without Phil...”
2.  MAIB costs a few bucks every month, with fewer issues of BDQ costing a pinch more... and that is the obstacle.

Well, in either case, there seems little to be done in this office here.
And if cost on such a modest level is the obstacle, then no budget will be there for a plausible stack of materials to get started on even a modest project.
So what gives ?
 
As I’ve said, ‘touchy issue’.

So, I am not sure that the ‘forum-format’ is the challenge.

 
“ Now if that does not rattle the cages...!!??”
 
Susanne Altenburger, PB&F

 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 10:16 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.

Hope to see you guys there!

Thanks,
Gregg Carlson
Tulsa, OK




I've already jointed the Facebook group, BUT if a large number of members prefer not to use Facebook (and, as a long-time user, I  can see why) you might consider to moving it to seen.is, a non-intrusive Facebook alternative that doesn't collect your information, doesn't require real IDs, and doesn't save records for the US government to snoop through.
On the issue whether YAHOO’s format has slowed down the discussion, it seems that the forum-format may be less of an issue than individual interests.
And that can be a touchy issue.

I sure am not happy about the 7 years of time since Phil’s departure, still without his final manuscripts in print.
A lot of good, sad and bad reasons for that.
The 39-footer #681 SACPAS-3/”GADABOUT” got done, tested and proven.
And there is e.g. also the astonishing reality of our thinking first published in the top-level monthly of this Navy (http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2013-07/landing-craft-21st-centuryhttp://hallman.nfshost.com/bolger/LCU-F.pdf), and then its reflection in the head of the 4-Star Boss of the MARINES herehttp://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2014-06/bridging-our-surface-connector-gap  A lot of work behind this, helping on that (national defense) level of analysis, design and discussion with in-house-resources that therefore did not go towards the books or the catalogue( s). 

But back to today’s concerns.
In terms if the discussions on YAHOO (or wherever), immediate case in point is the 500th column on our work in MAIB in the June 2016 issue, incl. 75+ by me since Phil’s death.
Perhaps I am looking through the wrong YAHOO window, but in my YAHOO-generated input-triggered updates on the discussion’s progress, –topics, -digressions, there has been rather scant reflection of what we/later-I have put into MAIB and (chronologically-) subsequent YAHOO Group discussions – a rather puzzling phenomenon. 
 
I can see that e.g. the ‘Fisheries’ cluster of issues may be under-exciting to quite a few. 
But - assuming I get the right feed – the various sequences of e.g. modifications to a number of his and our buildable-scale powerboat and sailing-cruiser designs appear to have found little resonance here in this YAHOO Group. 
And pretty much the same for getting designs into BOAT DESIGN QUARTERLY, which has featured more Bolger designs than it has had issues.

Two explanations:
1.  “Not interesting enough, certainly without Phil...”
2.  MAIB costs a few bucks every month, with fewer issues of BDQ costing a pinch more... and that is the obstacle.

Well, in either case, there seems little to be done in this office here.
And if cost on such a modest level is the obstacle, then no budget will be there for a plausible stack of materials to get started on even a modest project.
So what gives ?
 
As I’ve said, ‘touchy issue’.

So, I am not sure that the ‘forum-format’ is the challenge.

 
“ Now if that does not rattle the cages...!!??”
 
Susanne Altenburger, PB&F

 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 10:16 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 

Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 

My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK


Greetings to all and thanks for this wonderful group -- I hope it will stay the way it is on Yahoo if possible -- I'm one of those who avoid Facebook quite by choice and don't want to lose access to the group.
I agree. No to Facebook.

If Yahoo is to be abandoned, I'd prefer a stand-along bulletin board.


---In bolger@yahoogroups.com, <mpcosg@...> wrote :

I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can. 
Thanks 




Yahoo has retained message numbering. For instance, your message, below, is

71098


---In bolger@yahoogroups.com, <ray_4all@...> wrote :

---HELLO GREG, THANKS FOR YOUR EFFORT AAND SUPPORT OF US BOLGERITES. YAHOO DESERVES TO GO BROKE. THEY MADE A MAJOR MISTAKE WHEN THEY REMOVED THE NUMBERING OF MESSAGES. I HARDLY BOTHER TO USE GROUPS NOW AND I USED TO CHECK WEEKLY. PLEASE KEEP ME POSTED IF YOU MOVE. SOME GROUPS ALREADY HAVE. CHEERS-----------------------------------------
 
If a Forum is what everyone wants, Then I could set one up. I would be helpful if somebody had a registered domain...



From:"Joseph Stromski j.stromski@... [bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com>
To:"bolger@yahoogroups.com" <bolger@yahoogroups.com>
Sent:Saturday, 4 June 2016, 1:46
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 
A conversation of Facebook can be as in depth as the users desire it to be.
Best,
Joe


On Friday, June 3, 2016 9:53 AM, "Scot scot.mcpherson@... [bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Has anyone thought of putting up a bulletin board or similar presence? I have a website that could in theory be used for this, I know Gregg does too. One of us could spin off an instance of the website to support a forums site. I am just thinking that Facebook isn't really setup for in depth discussion, it's really more for a keeping in touch with your friends type of a platform.

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2016, at 10:16 AM,philbolger@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.

Hope to see you guys there!

Thanks,
Gregg Carlson
Tulsa, OK







Facebook has both pros and cons to be considered. I suspect that the resistance to FB is mostly from a lack of knowledge and actual experience with it. I also suspect that most of the members of this group are older folks (me too) who don't use FB and see it as a forum for kids, but that's only partially true. Facebook has many features beyond simply posting photos and can even host live video discussions at no cost. All I am suggesting is not to reject the use of FB if you have no experience with it because it can be a powerful tool. That's the pro side. On the negative side, they certainly do collect all sorts of user data, but so does Yahoo and every other site owner. As a user of FB, you don't have to create a complete profile, it can be pretty bare and still allow you to participate by reading posts or commenting. Something to think about.
 
Richard



From:"Joseph Stromski j.stromski@... [bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com>
To:"bolger@yahoogroups.com" <bolger@yahoogroups.com>
Sent:Friday, June 3, 2016 11:46 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 
A conversation of Facebook can be as in depth as the users desire it to be.
Best,
Joe


On Friday, June 3, 2016 9:53 AM, "Scot scot.mcpherson@... [bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Has anyone thought of putting up a bulletin board or similar presence? I have a website that could in theory be used for this, I know Gregg does too. One of us could spin off an instance of the website to support a forums site. I am just thinking that Facebook isn't really setup for in depth discussion, it's really more for a keeping in touch with your friends type of a platform.

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2016, at 10:16 AM,philbolger@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.

Hope to see you guys there!

Thanks,
Gregg Carlson
Tulsa, OK







Same here. Cumbersome at best. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Ed Koetsierekoetsier@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Here, Here. Not withstanding Susannes comments, I have also had massive problems with the Yahoo group. I have NEVER been able to access all area's. While I'm complaining, I've sent several emails over the years to Susanne for plans, and she has never responded, so I gave up ever building a Bolger boat.



From:"Ben Townerben.towner@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com>
To:bolger@yahoogroups.com
Sent:Saturday, 4 June 2016, 1:20
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 
You'll never get anyone younger to join in on the boat building fun with a Forum or Yahoo Groups. Take it from a "young'un". I've looked at, liked, and commented more in the last day than I have in the years being part of this group. The list serve had its time, but requires too many hoops to jump through for pictures, search, etc. For those of you who think the separated groups for finding plans/images is organized hasn't seen a modern web gallery!

I think a Facebook/Forum approach is the right way to go but someone has to host, moderate, and pay for the web. FB is a good start. Bring people in with FB and then direct to the Forum for archival info. 

Ben Towner

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Scotscot.mcpherson@...[bolger]<bolger@yahoogroups.com>wrote:
 
Has anyone thought of putting up a bulletin board or similar presence? I have a website that could in theory be used for this, I know Gregg does too. One of us could spin off an instance of the website to support a forums site. I am just thinking that Facebook isn't really setup for in depth discussion, it's really more for a keeping in touch with your friends type of a platform.

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2016, at 10:16 AM,philbolger@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.

Hope to see you guys there!

Thanks,
Gregg Carlson
Tulsa, OK






What about the message archive?There'sa lot of good information in there.

V/R
Chris


On 06/02/2016 04:07 PM,gregg.carlson@...[bolger] wrote:
Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK



A conversation of Facebook can be as in depth as the users desire it to be.
Best,
Joe


On Friday, June 3, 2016 9:53 AM, "Scot scot.mcpherson@... [bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Has anyone thought of putting up a bulletin board or similar presence? I have a website that could in theory be used for this, I know Gregg does too. One of us could spin off an instance of the website to support a forums site. I am just thinking that Facebook isn't really setup for in depth discussion, it's really more for a keeping in touch with your friends type of a platform.

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2016, at 10:16 AM,philbolger@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.

Hope to see you guys there!

Thanks,
Gregg Carlson
Tulsa, OK





You have the wrong Greg. I am Gregg Galyean and just joined.

On Friday, June 3, 2016,philbolger@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F




Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK



Here, Here. Not withstanding Susannes comments, I have also had massive problems with the Yahoo group. I have NEVER been able to access all area's. While I'm complaining, I've sent several emails over the years to Susanne for plans, and she has never responded, so I gave up ever building a Bolger boat.



From:"Ben Towner ben.towner@... [bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com>
To:bolger@yahoogroups.com
Sent:Saturday, 4 June 2016, 1:20
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 
You'll never get anyone younger to join in on the boat building fun with a Forum or Yahoo Groups. Take it from a "young'un". I've looked at, liked, and commented more in the last day than I have in the years being part of this group. The list serve had its time, but requires too many hoops to jump through for pictures, search, etc. For those of you who think the separated groups for finding plans/images is organized hasn't seen a modern web gallery!

I think a Facebook/Forum approach is the right way to go but someone has to host, moderate, and pay for the web. FB is a good start. Bring people in with FB and then direct to the Forum for archival info. 

Ben Towner

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Scotscot.mcpherson@...[bolger]<bolger@yahoogroups.com>wrote:
 
Has anyone thought of putting up a bulletin board or similar presence? I have a website that could in theory be used for this, I know Gregg does too. One of us could spin off an instance of the website to support a forums site. I am just thinking that Facebook isn't really setup for in depth discussion, it's really more for a keeping in touch with your friends type of a platform.

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2016, at 10:16 AM,philbolger@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 
My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.

Hope to see you guys there!

Thanks,
Gregg Carlson
Tulsa, OK






They can both work hand in hand, like texting and twitter (apples and oranges, I know). At 68, I wasn't interested in texting until I found out how helpful it is when trying to sell something on Craigslist. I still have no interest in twitter. I think Facebook and the Yahoo list can work well and complement each other.

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Ben Townerben.towner@...[bolger]<bolger@yahoogroups.com>wrote:

You'll never get anyone younger to join in on the boat building fun with a Forum or Yahoo Groups. Take it from a "young'un". I've looked at, liked, and commented more in the last day than I have in the years being part of this group. The list serve had its time, but requires too many hoops to jump through for pictures, search, etc. For those of you who think the separated groups for finding plans/images is organized hasn't seen a modern web gallery!

I think a Facebook/Forum approach is the right way to go but someone has to host, moderate, and pay for the web. FB is a good start. Bring people in with FB and then direct to the Forum for archival info.

Ben Towner

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Scotscot.mcpherson@...[bolger]<bolger@yahoogroups.com>wrote:

Has anyone thought of putting up a bulletin board or similar presence? I have a website that could in theory be used for this, I know Gregg does too. One of us could spin off an instance of the website to support a forums site. I am just thinking that Facebook isn't really setup for in depth discussion, it's really more for a keeping in touch with your friends type of a platform.

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2016, at 10:16 AM,philbolger@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F




Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK






You'll never get anyone younger to join in on the boat building fun with a Forum or Yahoo Groups. Take it from a "young'un". I've looked at, liked, and commented more in the last day than I have in the years being part of this group. The list serve had its time, but requires too many hoops to jump through for pictures, search, etc. For those of you who think the separated groups for finding plans/images is organized hasn't seen a modern web gallery!

I think a Facebook/Forum approach is the right way to go but someone has to host, moderate, and pay for the web. FB is a good start. Bring people in with FB and then direct to the Forum for archival info.

Ben Towner

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Scotscot.mcpherson@...[bolger]<bolger@yahoogroups.com>wrote:

Has anyone thought of putting up a bulletin board or similar presence? I have a website that could in theory be used for this, I know Gregg does too. One of us could spin off an instance of the website to support a forums site. I am just thinking that Facebook isn't really setup for in depth discussion, it's really more for a keeping in touch with your friends type of a platform.

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2016, at 10:16 AM,philbolger@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F




Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook

My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK





Thanks Susanne,

I am happy to play my small part to keep your and Phil's work alive - it deserves it.

We will of course keep the Yahoogroup alive. If Yahoo threatens to pull the plug, I will try to move it. One problem is whether to drag people by email into other venues - it doesn't seem right. There are undoubtedly people not paying close attention that might appreciate it, and others who would object. Having said that, I am not even sure I can extract the list members by email if I wanted to. We will cross that bridge later.

Some mention Googlegroups - which I did (I think?) but never caught on. I don't happen to like it myself.

Those with concerns about Facebook - I get it and share them. You could join and accept one friend only - the Bolger group. Those members, I do not believe, become your "friends" so I don't think you will get a lot of detritus about their other-than-Bolger lives. You also can choose when to go and look. I could be wrong and we have to acknowledge the extent of the Facebook tentacles is unknown.

BTW, Facebook does not allow aliases, but my understanding is that is only brought to their attention via a complaint. People could try a fake name, but I expect the internet knows all.

Anyway, I have clicked 116 members in as of this morning, and some neat pictures are beginning to appear. It is here again for those brave enough - or dumb enough - to join Facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/

 

Here is the message log for all 18 years (yikes!). I do not see a tally, but that and other measurements might exist.

Interesting to note the message count has peaked and waned, but membership (4200) has not. That suggests to me the interest in PCB&F is strong but perhaps the mode of conversation is a problem.

For me, I do like the pictures of boats - and by the group rules - having talked off topic, I know should say something about "boats: ;-)  As always, contact me off list for questions, comments, etc.

Regards, Gregg Carlson, Tulsa, OK



Has anyone thought of putting up a bulletin board or similar presence? I have a website that could in theory be used for this, I know Gregg does too. One of us could spin off an instance of the website to support a forums site. I am just thinking that Facebook isn't really setup for in depth discussion, it's really more for a keeping in touch with your friends type of a platform.

Scot McPherson, PMP CISSP MCSA
Shoreline, CT
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2016, at 10:16 AM,philbolger@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 

My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK




Thank you for tending to all this, Greg.
It takes editors and moderators to produce the environment for discussion.
In the context of the 500th piece in MAIB this month, would you have a total count on the exchanges here ?
If YAHOO won’t post the count. perhaps an every-100-submissions update would offer a track-record for all members.

Possibly under- or mis-educated about the relative intrusiveness by FB and L-I (e.g. aggressively tracking every member’s internet-move outside of FB and L-I ? ), PB&F does not do FACEBOOK nor LINKED-IN, long with quite a few other such ventures.
So, perhaps until the actual demise of YAHOO, we could stick with this set-up here.
’Eventually’ as the first of the new books finally hit print, and thus elements of the archive can be featured online, we might find other means to discuss matters, possibly directly linked to a PB&F online-presence to keep a running discussion between whatever is happening here now all the way back 60+ years on what Phil started then.

Susanne Altenburger, PB&F
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 
Sent:Friday, June 03, 2016 9:45 AM
Subject:Re: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
 
 

My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK


My Sentiments also.

Chris W

On 06/02/2016 04:10 PM, Mpcosgmpcosg@...[bolger] wrote:
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can.
Thanks

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK



---HELLO GREG, THANKS FOR YOUR EFFORT AAND SUPPORT OF US BOLGERITES. YAHOO DESERVES TO GO BROKE. THEY MADE A MAJOR MISTAKE WHEN THEY REMOVED THE NUMBERING OF MESSAGES. I HARDLY BOTHER TO USE GROUPS NOW AND I USED TO CHECK WEEKLY. PLEASE KEEP ME POSTED IF YOU MOVE. SOME GROUPS ALREADY HAVE. CHEERS-----------------------------------------
On Fri, 6/3/16,gregg.carlson@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Subject: [bolger] Moderator: Facebook
To:bolger@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, June 3, 2016, 3:07 AM












Hi Group,

I am the
moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another
boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver
run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil
Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as
active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little
outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news
lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo
groups.

I have set up a
Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This
link should lead you there:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/

Hopefully, we can
keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe
more active also.
If you have any
questions or comments, please contact me off list.

Hope to see you guys
there!
Thanks,Gregg
CarlsonTulsa, OK











#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252 --
#yiv8386433252ygrp-mkp {
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px
0;padding:0 10px;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-mkp hr {
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-mkp #yiv8386433252hd {
color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px
0;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-mkp #yiv8386433252ads {
margin-bottom:10px;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-mkp .yiv8386433252ad {
padding:0 0;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-mkp .yiv8386433252ad p {
margin:0;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-mkp .yiv8386433252ad a {
color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}
#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-sponsor
#yiv8386433252ygrp-lc {
font-family:Arial;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-sponsor
#yiv8386433252ygrp-lc #yiv8386433252hd {
margin:10px
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-sponsor
#yiv8386433252ygrp-lc .yiv8386433252ad {
margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252actions {
font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252activity {
background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252activity span {
font-weight:700;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252activity span:first-child {
text-transform:uppercase;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252activity span a {
color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252activity span span {
color:#ff7900;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252activity span
.yiv8386433252underline {
text-decoration:underline;}

#yiv8386433252 .yiv8386433252attach {
clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px
0;width:400px;}

#yiv8386433252 .yiv8386433252attach div a {
text-decoration:none;}

#yiv8386433252 .yiv8386433252attach img {
border:none;padding-right:5px;}

#yiv8386433252 .yiv8386433252attach label {
display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}

#yiv8386433252 .yiv8386433252attach label a {
text-decoration:none;}

#yiv8386433252 blockquote {
margin:0 0 0 4px;}

#yiv8386433252 .yiv8386433252bold {
font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}

#yiv8386433252 .yiv8386433252bold a {
text-decoration:none;}

#yiv8386433252 dd.yiv8386433252last p a {
font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}

#yiv8386433252 dd.yiv8386433252last p span {
margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}

#yiv8386433252 dd.yiv8386433252last p
span.yiv8386433252yshortcuts {
margin-right:0;}

#yiv8386433252 div.yiv8386433252attach-table div div a {
text-decoration:none;}

#yiv8386433252 div.yiv8386433252attach-table {
width:400px;}

#yiv8386433252 div.yiv8386433252file-title a, #yiv8386433252
div.yiv8386433252file-title a:active, #yiv8386433252
div.yiv8386433252file-title a:hover, #yiv8386433252
div.yiv8386433252file-title a:visited {
text-decoration:none;}

#yiv8386433252 div.yiv8386433252photo-title a,
#yiv8386433252 div.yiv8386433252photo-title a:active,
#yiv8386433252 div.yiv8386433252photo-title a:hover,
#yiv8386433252 div.yiv8386433252photo-title a:visited {
text-decoration:none;}

#yiv8386433252 div#yiv8386433252ygrp-mlmsg
#yiv8386433252ygrp-msg p a span.yiv8386433252yshortcuts {
font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}

#yiv8386433252 .yiv8386433252green {
color:#628c2a;}

#yiv8386433252 .yiv8386433252MsoNormal {
margin:0 0 0 0;}

#yiv8386433252 o {
font-size:0;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252photos div {
float:left;width:72px;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252photos div div {
border:1px solid
#666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252photos div label {
color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252reco-category {
font-size:77%;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252reco-desc {
font-size:77%;}

#yiv8386433252 .yiv8386433252replbq {
margin:4px;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {
margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-mlmsg {
font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean,
sans-serif;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-mlmsg table {
font-size:inherit;font:100%;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-mlmsg select,
#yiv8386433252 input, #yiv8386433252 textarea {
font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv8386433252
code {
font:115% monospace;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-mlmsg * {
line-height:1.22em;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-mlmsg #yiv8386433252logo {
padding-bottom:10px;}


#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-msg p a {
font-family:Verdana;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-msg
p#yiv8386433252attach-count span {
color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-reco
#yiv8386433252reco-head {
color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-reco {
margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-sponsor #yiv8386433252ov
li a {
font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-sponsor #yiv8386433252ov
li {
font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-sponsor #yiv8386433252ov
ul {
margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-text {
font-family:Georgia;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-text p {
margin:0 0 1em 0;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-text tt {
font-size:120%;}

#yiv8386433252 #yiv8386433252ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {
border-right:none !important;
}
#yiv8386433252
Thank you for the invitation.

Application made

Don Schultz
Sent from my mobile.


"gregg.carlson@... [bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK


Gregg - thanks, I got my "acceptance" email from FB.  I guess because my wife joined FB some time ago, and because we share an email, the Bolger FB group now thinks I'm "Kathryn". Oh well, no harm.
-Bill Kreamer


From:bolger@yahoogroups.com [mailto:bolger@yahoogroups.com]
Sent:Thursday, June 02, 2016 4:07 PM
To:bolger@yahoogroups.com
Subject:[bolger] Moderator: Facebook

 

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK


I'm on a few boat-related groups on FB. I enjoy it, but it has its issues. Thanks for putting that together!



tapped, not typed

On Jun 2, 2016, at 17:01, 'wordzenpix .'wordzenpix@...[bolger] <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Excellent. Thanks.

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:07 PM,gregg.carlson@...[bolger]<bolger@yahoogroups.com>wrote:
 

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK




Excellent. Thanks.

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:07 PM,gregg.carlson@...[bolger]<bolger@yahoogroups.com>wrote:

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK



Hi Greg,

I much prefer email over Facebook for this kind of group. FB is fine
for casual chit-chat, but email is better for more serious discussions,
where people write long posts and include links to other documents.

If Yahoo doesn't seem like a good host, why not set it up at Google
Groups? They work about the same as Yahoo.

Thanks -- Kent



On 6/2/2016 3:07 PM,gregg.carlson@...[bolger] wrote:
>
>
> Hi Group,
>
> I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder
> like you guys. For the really
> old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think
> there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
> fans and builders back then.
>
> The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little
> outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
> bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.
>
> I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join.
> This link should lead you there:
>
>
>https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/
>
>
> Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together
> maybe more active also.
>
>
> If you have any questions or comments, p lease contact me off list.
>
>
> Hope to see you guys there!
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gregg Carlson
>
> Tulsa, OK
>
>


--
Kent Multer |\ /|
Magic Metal Productionshttp://TheMagicM.com/| \/ |
KOBUSHI world percussionhttp://kobushi.com/| |
I don't/won't do Facebook, but ill enjoy it on yahoo while I can. 
Thanks 

On Jun 2, 2016, at 4:07 PM, "gregg.carlson@...[bolger]" <bolger@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK


Hi Group,

I am the moderator/owner of this Yahoo group - just another boatbuilder like you guys. For the really
old timers, this all started as a listserver run by Chris Noto. I think there were 50 or so of us Phil Bolger
fans and builders back then.

The Yahoo group isn't as active as it used to be - perhaps it's a little outmoded. Yahoo itself has had some
bad news lately, so I don't know what will happen to Yahoo groups.

I have set up a Facebook club that I would encourage everyone to join. This link should lead you there:


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1629186337408650/


Hopefully, we can keep the core of the 4200 members somewhat together maybe more active also.


If you have any questions or comments, please contact me off list.


Hope to see you guys there!


Thanks,

Gregg Carlson

Tulsa, OK