Re: Theoretical Overload??
--- Inbolger@egroups.com, "John Ewing" <j.c.ewing@h...> wrote:
eGroup as to the Bolger List. As examples, the 'Physics' and 'Design
Question' threads repeat discussion I'm pretty certain I have seen on
the Boatdesign List. I feel the great preponderance of these
theoretical and design threads of late is making the Bolger List
unnecessarily long and demanding (and may even be resulting in a few
subscription cancellations). As interesting as they are, we can (and I
occasionally do) review these higher-level, not-directly-Bolger topics
on the Boatdesign List -- which, as I see it, is its raison d'etre
afterall.
Files.
> Hey Group, I don't want to give offence, but it seams to me thatmany recent threads would be at least as appropriate to the Boatdesign
eGroup as to the Bolger List. As examples, the 'Physics' and 'Design
Question' threads repeat discussion I'm pretty certain I have seen on
the Boatdesign List. I feel the great preponderance of these
theoretical and design threads of late is making the Bolger List
unnecessarily long and demanding (and may even be resulting in a few
subscription cancellations). As interesting as they are, we can (and I
occasionally do) review these higher-level, not-directly-Bolger topics
on the Boatdesign List -- which, as I see it, is its raison d'etre
afterall.
> I don't know but, with Bolger List files filling up, it might befound that some of the material there could be relocated to Boatdesign
Files.
> Just the thoughts of a beginning boatb
Hey Group, I don't want to give offence, but it
seams to me that many recent threads would be at least as appropriate to the
Boatdesign eGroup as to the Bolger List. As examples, the 'Physics' and 'Design
Question' threads repeat discussion I'm pretty certain I have seen on the
Boatdesign List. I feel the great preponderance of these theoretical and design
threads of late is making the Bolger List unnecessarily long and demanding (and
may even be resulting in a few subscription cancellations). As interesting as
they are, we can (and I occasionally do) review these higher-level,
not-directly-Bolger topics on the Boatdesign List -- which, as I see it, is its
raison d'etre afterall.
I don't know but, with Bolger List files filling up, it might be found that some of the material there could be relocated to Boatdesign Files.
Just the thoughts of a beginning boatbuilder. John
I don't know but, with Bolger List files filling up, it might be found that some of the material there could be relocated to Boatdesign Files.
Just the thoughts of a beginning boatbuilder. John
John:
I was just about to make this suggestion.
Needless to say, I concur.
Chuck
----- Original Message -----From:John EwingSent:Monday, November 06, 2000 2:38 PMSubject:[bolger] Theoretical Overload??Hey Group, I don't want to give offence, but it seams to me that many recent threads would be at least as appropriate to the Boatdesign eGroup as to the Bolger List. As examples, the 'Physics' and 'Design Question' threads repeat discussion I'm pretty certain I have seen on the Boatdesign List. I feel the great preponderance of these theoretical and design threads of late is making the Bolger List unnecessarily long and demanding (and may even be resulting in a few subscription cancellations). As interesting as they are, we can (and I occasionally do) review these higher-level, not-directly-Bolger topics on the Boatdesign List -- which, as I see it, is its raison d'etre afterall.
I don't know but, with Bolger List files filling up, it might be found that some of the material there could be relocated to Boatdesign Files.
Just the thoughts of a beginning boatbuilder. John